Compositions of ethylene/α-olefin multi-block interpolymer for elastic films and laminates

ABSTRACT

This invention relates to polyolefin compositions. In particular, the invention pertains to elastic polymer compositions that can be more easily processed on cast film lines, extrusion lamination or coating lines. The compositions of the present invention preferably comprise an elastomeric polyolefin resin and a high pressure low density type resin.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/376,956, filed Mar. 15, 2006 and U.S. application Ser. No. 11/377,333, filed Mar. 15, 2006 and now U.S. Pat. No. 7,355,089. This application also claims priority under 35 USC §120 from U.S. application Ser. No. 11/376,835 and now abandoned, filed Mar. 15, 2006. For purposes of United States patent practice, the contents of the above referenced applications are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to blends of ethylene/α-olefin multi-block interpolymer compositions and styrenic block copolymers having suitability for elastic compositions with improved processability. In one aspect, this invention relates to films made from blends of ethylene/α-olefin multi-block interpolymer compositions and styrenic block copolymers. In another aspect, this invention relates to filaments and fibers made from blends of ethylene/α-olefin multi-block interpolymer compositions and styrenic block copolymers. In yet another aspect, this invention relates to laminates comprising filaments, fibers, films, or combinations thereof made from blends of ethylene/α-olefin multi-block interpolymer compositions and styrenic block copolymers. In still yet another aspect, this invention relates to articles fabricated using films, fibers, filaments, laminates, or combinations thereof made using blends of ethylene/α-olefin multi-block interpolymer compositions and styrenic block copolymers. The compositions have elastic performance, improved heat resistance, and other desirable characteristics.

BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Styrenic block copolymers, such as SEBS (polystyrene-saturated polybutadiene-polystyrene), SBS (polystyrene-polybutadiene-polystyrene), SEPS (polystyrene-saturated polyisoprene-polystyrene), SIS (polystyrene-polyisoprene-polystyrene), and SEPSEP are known in the art. They exhibit excellent physical properties, such as elasticity and flexibility. However, they often cannot be readily processed on typical polyolefin processing equipment, without the need for flow enhancers and other processing aids. Upon formulation with such materials, end-use properties such as tensile strength and heat resistance can suffer. Furthermore, they can suffer from thermal instability such as cross-linking (i.e. SBS) and scission (i.e. SIS).

Ethylene/α-olefin multi-block interpolymer compositions are readily processible using typical polyolefin processing equipment. They exhibit desirable end-use properties such as high heat resistance and high tensile strength. However, ethylene/α-olefin multi-block interpolymer compositions are typically are not as flexible and elastic as the most elastic styrenic block copolymers when used at high strains (i.e. >100%).

It would be desirable to have a thermoplastic elastomer composition which exhibits excellent physical properties, such as elasticity and flexibility, while at the same time being readily processible using typical polyolefin processing equipment.

Elastomeric compositions have found particular use in elastic films and fibers. They can be used by themselves, but are more commonly used in laminated structure wherein the substrate is a nonwoven fabric. The elastic film or fiber imparts elasticity to the nonwoven laminates. Such elastic nonwoven laminate materials have found use in the hygiene and medical market particularly in such applications as elastic diaper tabs, side panels of training pants, leg gathers, feminine hygiene articles, swim pants, incontinent wear, veterinary products, protective clothing, bandages, items of health care such as surgeon's gowns, surgical drapes, sterilization wrap, wipes, and the like. These materials may also find use in other nonwoven applications including but are not limited to filters (gas and liquid), automotive and marine protective covers, home furnishing such as bedding, carpet underpaddings, wall coverings, floor coverings, window shades, scrims etc.

Elastomeric films can be made in a number of ways known to those of ordinary skill in the art. Single or multi-layer elastic films are possible. Such processes can include bubble extrusion and biaxial orientation processes, as well as tenter frame techniques. In order to facilitate elasticity, the elastic film is usually employed singly or as a layer, in the case of multi-layer films. As many elastic compositions tend to be sticky and hence difficult to process or poor in hand feel, at least one non-sticky/non-tacky material may be used to comprise at least a portion of the film surface to mitigate this effect. Alternatively, various additives and modifiers such (i.e. slip agents, anti-block etc.) may also be employed.

Elastomeric fibers or filaments can be made in a number of ways known to those of ordinary skill in the art. Monofilament, bicomponent, multicomponent, islands-in-the-sea, crescent, side-by-side and other configurations known to those of ordinary skill in the art are suitable for use with the inventive composition. Like films, elastic fibers also tend to be sticky and hence difficult to process or poor in hand feel. At least one non-sticky/non-tacky material may be used to comprise at least a portion of the film or fiber surface to mitigate this effect. Alternatively, various additives and modifiers such (i.e. slip agents, anti-block etc.) mentioned above may also be employed.

Elastomeric compositions are often used for their retractive force. They are commonly used in various forms including fibers, film, laminates and fabric. When used in an article, the retractive force of the elastomer provides the “holding force” of the structure. For example, in health and hygiene articles such as infant diapers, training pants, and adult incontinence articles, the elastomers are commonly used in laminate structures. These laminate structures help to maintain fit of the article to the body. Body heat can result in the decrease of the holding force of the elastomer over time (measured as stress-relaxation) which can translate to loosening and eventual sagging of the article resulting in a decrease in fit. Styrenic block copolymers and their formulations used in these structures can suffer from excessive stress-relaxation and consequently articles fabricated using these materials can sag unacceptably in end-use. Accordingly, it is a goal to reduce the amount of stress-relaxation (increase in heat resistance) of the elastomer. This phenomenon is a known problem and has been described previously in the art. Such art includes but is not limited to WO9829248A1, WO0058541A1, US20020052585A1, US20040127128A1, U.S. Pat. No. 6,916,750B2, U.S. Pat. No. 6,547,915B2, U.S. Pat. No. 6,323,389B1, U.S. Pat. No. 6,207,237B1, U.S. Pat. No. 6,187,425B1, U.S. Pat. No. 5,332,613A, U.S. Pat. No. 5,288,791A, U.S. Pat. No. 5,260,126A, U.S. Pat. No. 5,169,706A, GB2335427A, and WO2004037141A1.

The compositions suitable for use in elastic films and laminates comprise a polymer blend comprising at least one ethylene/α-olefin interpolymer, wherein the ethylene/α-olefin interpolymer:

(a) has a Mw/Mn (Mw denotes weight averaged molecular weight; Mn denotes number averaged molecular weight) from about 1.7 to about 3.5, at least one melting point, Tm, in degrees Celsius, and a density, d, in grams/cubic centimeter, wherein the numerical values of Tm and d correspond to the relationship: Tm>−2002.9+4538.5(d)−2422.2(d)²; or

(b) has a Mw/Mn from about 1.7 to about 3.5, and is characterized by a heat of fusion, ΔH in J/g, and a delta quantity, ΔT, in degrees Celsius defined as the temperature difference between the tallest DSC peak and the tallest CRYSTAF peak, wherein the numerical values of ΔT and ΔH have the following relationships: ΔT>−0.1299(ΔH)+62.81 for ΔH greater than zero and up to 130 J/g, ΔT≧48° C. for ΔH greater than 130 J/g, wherein the CRYSTAF peak is determined using at least 5 percent of the cumulative polymer, and if less than 5 percent of the polymer has an identifiable CRYSTAF peak, then the CRYSTAF temperature is 30° C.; or

(c) is characterized by an elastic recovery, Re, in percent at 300 percent strain and 1 cycle measured with a compression-molded film of the ethylene/α-olefin interpolymer, and has a density, d, in grams/cubic centimeter, wherein the numerical values of Re and d satisfy the following relationship when ethylene/α-olefin interpolymer is substantially free of a cross-linked phase: Re>1481-1629(d); or

(d) has a molecular fraction which elutes between 40° C. and 130° C. when fractionated using TREF, characterized in that the fraction has a molar comonomer content of at least 5 percent higher than that of a comparable random ethylene interpolymer fraction eluting between the same temperatures, wherein said comparable random ethylene interpolymer has the same comonomer(s) and has a melt index, density, and molar comonomer content (based on the whole polymer) within 10 percent of that of the ethylene/α-olefin interpolymer; or

(e) has a storage modulus at 25° C., G′(25° C.), and a storage modulus at 100° C., G′(100° C.), wherein the ratio of G′(25° C.) to G′(100° C.) is in the range of about 1:1 to about 9:1.

and, at least one styrenic block copolymer;

wherein the ethylene/α-olefin interpolymer has a density of from about 0.855 to about 0.878 g/cc and a melt index (I₂) of from about 0.5 g/10 min. to about 20 g/10 min.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows the melting point/density relationship for the inventive polymers (represented by diamonds) as compared to traditional random copolymers (represented by circles) and Ziegler-Natta copolymers (represented by triangles).

FIG. 2 shows plots of delta DSC-CRYSTAF as a function of DSC Melt Enthalpy for various polymers. The diamonds represent random ethylene/octene copolymers; the squares represent polymer examples 1-4; the triangles represent polymer examples 5-9; and the circles represent polymer Examples 10-19. The “X” symbols represent polymer Comparative Examples A*-F*.

FIG. 3 shows the effect of density on elastic recovery for unoriented films made from inventive interpolymers (represented by the squares and circles) and traditional copolymers (represented by the triangles which are various AFFINITY® polymers). The squares represent inventive ethylene/butene copolymers; and the circles represent inventive ethylene/octene copolymers.

FIG. 4 is a plot of octene content of TREF fractionated ethylene/1-octene copolymer fractions versus TREF elution temperature of the fraction for the polymer of Example 5 (represented by the circles) and comparative polymer Comparative Examples E* and F* (represented by the “X” symbols). The diamonds represent traditional random ethylene/octene copolymers.

FIG. 5 is a plot of octene content of TREF fractionated ethylene/1-octene copolymer fractions versus TREF elution temperature of the fraction for the polymer of Example 5 (curve 1) and for polymer Comparative Examples F* (curve 2). The squares represent polymer Comparative Examples F*; and the triangles represent Example 5.

FIG. 6 is a graph of the log of storage modulus as a function of temperature for comparative ethylene/1-octene copolymer (curve 2) and propylene/ethylene copolymer (curve 3) and for two ethylene/1-octene block copolymers of the invention made with differing quantities of chain shuttling agent (curves 1).

FIG. 7 shows a plot of TMA (1 mm) versus flex modulus for some inventive polymers (represented by the diamonds), as compared to some known polymers. The triangles represent various VERSIFY® polymers; the circles represent various random ethylene/styrene copolymers; and the squares represent various AFFINITY® polymers.

FIG. 8 is plot of natural log ethylene mole fraction for random ethylene/α-olefin copolymers as a function of the inverse of DSC peak melting temperature or ATREF peak temperature. The filled squares represent data points obtained from random homogeneously branched ethylene/α-olefin copolymers in ATREF; and the open squares represent data points obtained from random homogeneously branched ethylene/α-olefin copolymers in DSC. “P” is the ethylene mole fraction; “T” is the temperature in Kelvin.

FIG. 9 is a plot constructed on the basis of the Flory equation for random ethylene/α-olefin copolymers to illustrate the definition of “block index.” “A” represents the whole, perfect random copolymer; “B” represents a pure “hard segment”; and “C” represents the whole, perfect block copolymer having the same comonomer content as “A”. A, B, and C define a triangular area within which most TREF fractions would fall.

FIG. 10 is a representation of a normal DSC profile for an inventive polymer.

FIG. 11 is a weighted DSC profile obtained by converting FIG. 14.

FIG. 12 is a ¹³C NMR spectrum of Polymer 19A.

FIG. 13 shows tensile recovery of two-component blends containing Component A (i.e., KRATON® G1652, a SEBS) and Component B (i.e., AFFINITY® EG8100 or inventive Polymer 19a, 19b or 19i). The cycles represent blends containing KRATON® G1652 and AFFINITY® EG8100 (i.e., Comparative Examples Y1-Y5 having respectively 0%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% of AFFINITY® EG8100). The diamonds represent blends containing KRATON® G1652 and inventive Polymer 19a (i.e., Examples 34-37 having respectively 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% of Polymer 19a). The triangles represent the blends containing KRATON® G1652 and inventive Polymer 19b (i.e., Examples 38-41 having respectively 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% of Polymer 19b). The squares represent blends containing KRATON® G1652 and inventive Polymer 19i (i.e., Examples 42-45 having respectively 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% of Polymer 19i).

FIG. 14 shows heat resistance properties (i.e., TMA temperatures) of two-component blends containing Component A (i.e., KRATON® G1652, a SEBS) and Component B (i.e., AFFINITY® EG8100 or inventive Polymer 19a, 19b or 19i). The cycles represent blends containing KRATON® G1652 and AFFINITY® EG8100 (i.e., Comparative Examples Y1-Y5 having respectively 0%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% of AFFINITY® EG8100). The diamonds represent blends containing KRATON® G1652 and inventive Polymer 19a (i.e., Examples 34-37 having respectively 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% of Polymer 19a). The triangles represent the blends containing KRATON® G1652 and inventive Polymer 19b (i.e., Examples 38-41 having respectively 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% of Polymer 19b). The squares represent blends containing KRATON® G1652 and inventive Polymer 19i (i.e., Examples 42-45 having respectively 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% of Polymer 19i).

FIG. 15 shows the effect of composition on permanent set after 300% deformation using the 300% hysteresis test.

FIG. 16 shows the effect of composition on permanent set after 300% deformation using the 300% hysteresis test.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

General Definitions

The following terms shall have the given meaning for the purposes of this invention:

By “neck-in” is meant the reduction in a film web width as it is extruded from a die and which will be caused by a combination of swelling and surface tension effects as the material leaves the die. Neck-in is measured as the distance between the extrudate web as it emerges from the die minus the width of the extrudate web as it is taken up.

“Polymer” means a polymeric compound prepared by polymerizing monomers, whether of the same or a different type. The generic term “polymer” embraces the terms “homopolymer,” “copolymer,” “terpolymer” as well as “interpolymer.”

“Interpolymer” means a polymer prepared by the polymerization of at least two different types of monomers. The generic term “interpolymer” includes the term “copolymer” (which is usually employed to refer to a polymer prepared from two different monomers) as well as the term “terpolymer” (which is usually employed to refer to a polymer prepared from three different types of monomers). It also encompasses polymers made by polymerizing four or more types of monomers.

The term “ethylene/α-olefin interpolymer” generally refers to polymers comprising ethylene and an α-olefin having 3 or more carbon atoms. Preferably, ethylene comprises the majority mole fraction of the whole polymer, i.e., ethylene comprises at least about 50 mole percent of the whole polymer. More preferably ethylene comprises at least about 60 mole percent, at least about 70 mole percent, or at least about 80 mole percent, with the substantial remainder of the whole polymer comprising at least one other comonomer that is preferably an α-olefin having 3 or more carbon atoms. For many ethylene/octene copolymers, the preferred composition comprises an ethylene content greater than about 80 mole percent of the whole polymer and an octene content of from about 10 to about 15, preferably from about 15 to about 20 mole percent of the whole polymer. In some embodiments, the ethylene/α-olefin interpolymers do not include those produced in low yields or in a minor amount or as a by-product of a chemical process. While the ethylene/α-olefin interpolymers can be blended with one or more polymers, the as produced ethylene/α-olefin interpolymers are substantially pure and often comprise a major component of the reaction product of a polymerization process.

The ethylene/α-olefin interpolymers comprise ethylene and one or more copolymerizable α-olefin comonomers in polymerized form, characterized by multiple blocks or segments of two or more polymerized monomer units differing in chemical or physical properties. That is, the ethylene/α-olefin interpolymers are block interpolymers, or “olefin block copolymers”, preferably multi-block interpolymers or copolymers. The terms “interpolymer” and copolymer” are used interchangeably herein. In some embodiments, the multi-block copolymer can be represented by the following formula: (AB)_(n) where n is at least 1, preferably an integer greater than 1, such as 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, or higher, “A” represents a hard block or segment and “B” represents a soft block or segment. Preferably, As and Bs are linked in a substantially linear fashion, as opposed to a substantially branched or substantially star-shaped fashion. In other embodiments, A blocks and B blocks are randomly distributed along the polymer chain. In other words, the block copolymers usually do not have a structure as follows. AAA-AA−BBB-BB

In still other embodiments, the block copolymers do not usually have a third type of block, which comprises different comonomer(s). In yet other embodiments, each of block A and block B has monomers or comonomers substantially randomly distributed within the block. In other words, neither block A nor block B comprises two or more sub-segments (or sub-blocks) of distinct composition, such as a tip segment, which has a substantially different composition than the rest of the block.

The multi-block polymers typically comprise various amounts of “hard” and “soft” segments. “Hard” segments refer to blocks of polymerized units in which ethylene is present in an amount greater than about 95 weight percent, and preferably greater than about 98 weight percent based on the weight of the polymer. In other words, the comonomer content (content of monomers other than ethylene) in the hard segments is less than about 5 weight percent, and preferably less than about 2 weight percent based on the weight of the polymer. In some embodiments, the hard segments comprise all or substantially all ethylene. “Soft” segments, on the other hand, refer to blocks of polymerized units in which the comonomer content (content of monomers other than ethylene) is greater than about 5 weight percent, preferably greater than about 8 weight percent, greater than about 10 weight percent, or greater than about 15 weight percent based on the weight of the polymer. In some embodiments, the comonomer content in the soft segments can be greater than about 20 weight percent, greater than about 25 weight percent, greater than about 30 weight percent, greater than about 35 weight percent, greater than about 40 weight percent, greater than about 45 weight percent, greater than about 50 weight percent, or greater than about 60 weight percent.

The soft segments can often be present in a block interpolymer from about 1 weight percent to about 99 weight percent of the total weight of the block interpolymer, preferably from about 5 weight percent to about 95 weight percent, from about 10 weight percent to about 90 weight percent, from about 15 weight percent to about 85 weight percent, from about 20 weight percent to about 80 weight percent, from about 25 weight percent to about 75 weight percent, from about 30 weight percent to about 70 weight percent, from about 35 weight percent to about 65 weight percent, from about 40 weight percent to about 60 weight percent, or from about 45 weight percent to about 55 weight percent of the total weight of the block interpolymer. Conversely, the hard segments can be present in similar ranges. The soft segment weight percentage and the hard segment weight percentage can be calculated based on data obtained from DSC or NMR. Such methods and calculations are disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2006-0199930A1, entitled “Ethylene/α-Olefin Block Interpolymers”, filed on Mar. 15, 2006, in the name of Colin L. P. Shan, Lonnie Hazlitt, et. al. and assigned to Dow Global Technologies Inc., the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.

The term “crystalline” if employed, refers to a polymer that possesses a first order transition or crystalline melting point (Tm) as determined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) or equivalent technique. The term may be used interchangeably with the term “semicrystalline”. The term “amorphous” refers to a polymer lacking a crystalline melting point as determined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) or equivalent technique.

“Elastomeric” means that the material will substantially resume its original shape after being stretched. To qualify a material as elastomeric and thus suitable for the first component, a 1-cycle hysteresis test to 80% strain was used. For this test, the specimens (6 inches long by 1 inch wide) were then loaded lengthwise into a Sintech type mechanical testing device fitted with pneumatically activated line-contact grips with an initial separation of 4 inches. Then the sample was stretched to 80% strain at 500 mm/min, and returned to 0% strain at the same speed. The strain at 10 g load upon retraction was taken as the set. Upon immediate and subsequent extension, the onset of positive tensile force was taken as the set strain. The hysteresis loss is defined as the energy difference between the extension and retraction cycle. The load down was the retractive force at 50% strain. In all cases, the samples were measured green or unaged. Strain is defined as the percent change in sample length divided by the original sample length (22.25 mm) equal to the original grip separation. Stress is defined as the force divided by the initial cross sectional area.

The term “multi-block copolymer” or “segmented copolymer” refers to a polymer comprising two or more chemically distinct regions or segments (referred to as “blocks”) preferably joined in a linear manner, that is, a polymer comprising chemically differentiated units which are joined end-to-end with respect to polymerized ethylenic functionality, rather than in pendent or grafted fashion. In a preferred embodiment, the blocks differ in the amount or type of comonomer incorporated therein, the density, the amount of crystallinity, the crystallite size attributable to a polymer of such composition, the type or degree of tacticity (isotactic or syndiotactic), regio-regularity or regio-irregularity, the amount of branching, including long chain branching or hyper-branching, the homogeneity, or any other chemical or physical property. The multi-block copolymers are characterized by unique distributions of both polydispersity index (PDI or Mw/Mn), block length distribution, and/or block number distribution due to the unique process making of the copolymers. More specifically, when produced in a continuous process, the polymers desirably possess PDI from 1.7 to 2.9, preferably from 1.8 to 2.5, more preferably from 1.8 to 2.2, and most preferably from 1.8 to 2.1. When produced in a batch or semi-batch process, the polymers possess PDI from 1.0 to 2.9, preferably from 1.3 to 2.5, more preferably from 1.4 to 2.0, and most preferably from 1.4 to 1.8.

In the following description, all numbers disclosed herein are approximate values, regardless whether the word “about” or “approximate” is used in connection therewith. Depending upon the context in which such values are described herein, and unless specifically stated otherwise, such values may vary by 1 percent, 2 percent, 5 percent, or, sometimes, 10 to 20 percent. Whenever a numerical range with a lower limit, RL and an upper limit, RU, is disclosed, any number falling within the range is specifically disclosed. In particular, the following numbers within the range are specifically disclosed: R=RL+k*(RU−RL), wherein k is a variable ranging from 1 percent to 100 percent with a 1 percent increment, i.e., k is 1 percent, 2 percent, 3 percent, 4 percent, 5 percent, . . . , 50 percent, 51 percent, 52 percent, . . . , 95 percent, 96 percent, 97 percent, 98 percent, 99 percent, or 100 percent. Moreover, any numerical range defined by two R numbers as defined in the above is also specifically disclosed.

For purposes of this invention, a film is generally considered to be “elastic” if it has a permanent set of less than 40% as determined according to the following procedure: a 1 inch wide by 6 inch long sample is loaded lengthwise into a Sintech mechanical testing device fitted with pneumatically activated line-contact grips with an initial separation of 4 inches. Then, the sample is stretched to 80% strain at 500 mm/min and returned to 0% strain at the same speed. The strain at 0.05 MPa (megapascals) upon retraction is taken as the permanent set.

“Density” is tested in accordance with ASTM D792.

“Melt Index (12)” is determined according to ASTM D1238 using a weight of 2.16 kg at 190° C. for polymers comprising ethylene as the major component in the polymer.

“Melt Flow Rate (MFR)” is determined according to ASTM D1238 using a weight of 2.16 kg at 230° C. for polymers comprising propylene as the major component in the polymer.

“Molecular weight distribution” or MWD is measured by conventional GPC per the procedure described by Williams, T.; Ward, I. M. Journal of Polymer Science, Polymer Letters Edition (1968), 6(9), 621-624. Coefficient B is 1. Coefficient A is 0.4316.

The term high pressure low density type resin is defined to mean that the polymer is partly or entirely homopolymerized or copolymerized in autoclave or tubular reactors at pressures above 14,500 psi (100 MPa) with the use of free-radical initiators, such as peroxides (see for example U.S. Pat. No. 4,599,392, herein incorporated by reference) and includes “LDPE” which may also be referred to as “high pressure ethylene polymer” or “highly branched polyethylene”. The cumulative detector fraction (CDF) of these materials is greater than about 0.02 for molecular weight greater than 1000000 g/mol as measured using light scattering. CDF may be determined as described in WO2005/023912 A2, which is herein incorporated by reference for its teachings regarding CDF.

The term “high pressure low density type resin” also includes branched polypropylene materials (both homopolymer and copolymer). For the purposes of the present invention, “branched polypropylene materials” means the type of branched polypropylene materials disclosed in WO2003/082971, hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

Ethylene/α-Olefin Interpolymers

The ethylene/α-olefin interpolymers used in embodiments of the invention (also referred to as “inventive interpolymer”, “inventive polymer” or “olefin block copolymer”) comprise ethylene and one or more copolymerizable α-olefin comonomers in polymerized form, characterized by multiple blocks or segments of two or more polymerized monomer units differing in chemical or physical properties (block interpolymer), preferably a multi-block copolymer. The ethylene/α-olefin interpolymers are characterized by one or more of the aspects described as follows.

In one aspect, the ethylene/α-olefin interpolymers used in embodiments of the invention have a Mw/Mn from about 1.7 to about 3.5 and at least one melting point, Tm, in degrees Celsius and density, d, in grams/cubic centimeter, wherein the numerical values of the variables correspond to the relationship: T _(m)>−2002.9+4538.5(d)−2422.2(d)², and preferably T _(m)≧−6288.1+13141(d)−6720.3(d)², and more preferably T _(m)≧2858.91−1825.3(d)+1112.8(d)².

Such melting point/density relationship is illustrated in FIG. 1. Unlike the traditional random copolymers of ethylene/α-olefins whose melting points decrease with decreasing densities, the inventive interpolymers (represented by diamonds) exhibit melting points substantially independent of the density, particularly when density is between about 0.87 g/cc to about 0.95 g/cc. For example, the melting point of such polymers are in the range of about 110° C. to about 130° C. when density ranges from 0.875 g/cc to about 0.945 g/cc. In some embodiments, the melting point of such polymers are in the range of about 115° C. to about 125° C. when density ranges from 0.875 g/cc to about 0.945 g/cc.

In another aspect, the ethylene/α-olefin interpolymers comprise, in polymerized form, ethylene and one or more α-olefins and are characterized by a ΔT, in degrees Celsius, defined as the temperature for the tallest Differential Scanning Calorimetry (“DSC”) peak minus the temperature for the tallest Crystallization Analysis Fractionation (“CRYSTAF”) peak and a heat of fusion in J/g, ΔH, and ΔT and ΔH satisfy the following relationships: ΔT>−0.1299(ΔH)+62.81, and preferably ΔT≧−0.1299(ΔH)+64.38, and more preferably ΔT≧−0.1299(ΔH)+65.95, for ΔH up to 130 J/g. Moreover, ΔT is equal to or greater than 48° C. for ΔH greater than 130 J/g. The CRYSTAF peak is determined using at least 5 percent of the cumulative polymer (that is, the peak must represent at least 5 percent of the cumulative polymer), and if less than 5 percent of the polymer has an identifiable CRYSTAF peak, then the CRYSTAF temperature is 30° C., and ΔH is the numerical value of the heat of fusion in J/g. More preferably, the highest CRYSTAF peak contains at least 10 percent of the cumulative polymer. FIG. 2 shows plotted data for inventive polymers as well as comparative examples. Integrated peak areas and peak temperatures are calculated by the computerized drawing program supplied by the instrument maker. The diagonal line shown for the random ethylene octene comparative polymers corresponds to the equation ΔT=−0.1299 (ΔH)+62.81.

In yet another aspect, the ethylene/α-olefin interpolymers have a molecular fraction which elutes between 40° C. and 130° C. when fractionated using Temperature Rising Elution Fractionation (“TREF”), characterized in that said fraction has a molar comonomer content higher, preferably at least 5 percent higher, more preferably at least 10 percent higher, than that of a comparable random ethylene interpolymer fraction eluting between the same temperatures, wherein the comparable random ethylene interpolymer contains the same comonomer(s), and has a melt index, density, and molar comonomer content (based on the whole polymer) within 10 percent of that of the block interpolymer. Preferably, the Mw/Mn of the comparable interpolymer is also within 10 percent of that of the block interpolymer and/or the comparable interpolymer has a total comonomer content within 10 weight percent of that of the block interpolymer.

In still another aspect, the ethylene/α-olefin interpolymers are characterized by an elastic recovery, Re, in percent at 300 percent strain and 1 cycle measured on a compression-molded film of an ethylene/α-olefin interpolymer, and has a density, d, in grams/cubic centimeter, wherein the numerical values of Re and d satisfy the following relationship when ethylene/α-olefin interpolymer is substantially free of a cross-linked phase: Re>1481−1629(d); and preferably Re≧1491−1629(d); and more preferably Re≧1501−1629(d); and even more preferably Re≧1511−1629(d).

FIG. 3 shows the effect of density on elastic recovery for unoriented films made from certain inventive interpolymers and traditional random copolymers. For the same density, the inventive interpolymers have substantially higher elastic recoveries.

In some embodiments, the ethylene/α-olefin interpolymers have a tensile strength above 1 MPa, preferably a tensile strength≧2 MPa, more preferably a tensile strength≧3 MPa and/or an elongation at break of at least 100 percent, more preferably at least 250 percent, highly preferably at least 500 percent, and most highly preferably at least 750 percent at a crosshead separation rate of 11 cm/minute using microtensile ASTM-1708 geometry.

In still other embodiments, the ethylene/α-olefin interpolymers have a 70° C. compression set (ASTM D-3574) of less than 98 percent, preferably less than 95 percent, and more preferably less than 93 percent.

In some embodiments, the ethylene/α-olefin interpolymers have a heat of fusion of less than 85 J/g and/or a pellet blocking strength of equal to or less than 100 pounds/foot (4800 Pa), preferably equal to or less than 50 lbs/ft² (2400 Pa), especially equal to or less than 5 lbs/ft² (240 Pa), and as low as 0 lbs/ft² (0 Pa).

In other embodiments, the ethylene/α-olefin interpolymers comprise, in polymerized form, at least 50 mole percent ethylene and have a 70° C. compression set of less than 80 percent, preferably less than 70 percent or less than 60 percent, most preferably less than 40 to 50 percent and down to close to zero percent.

In some embodiments, the multi-block copolymers possess a PDI fitting a Schultz-Flory distribution rather than a Poisson distribution. The copolymers are further characterized as having both a polydisperse block distribution and a polydisperse distribution of block sizes and possessing a most probable distribution of block lengths. Preferred multi-block copolymers are those containing 4 or more blocks or segments including terminal blocks. More preferably, the copolymers include at least 5, 10 or 20 blocks or segments including terminal blocks.

Comonomer content may be measured using any suitable technique, with techniques based on nuclear magnetic resonance (“NMR”) spectroscopy preferred. Moreover, for polymers or blends of polymers having relatively broad TREF curves, the polymer desirably is first fractionated using TREF into fractions each having an eluted temperature range of 10° C. or less. That is, each eluted fraction has a collection temperature window of 10° C. or less. Using this technique, said block interpolymers have at least one such fraction having a higher molar comonomer content than a corresponding fraction of the comparable interpolymer.

In another aspect, the inventive polymer is an olefin interpolymer, preferably comprising ethylene and one or more copolymerizable comonomers in polymerized form, characterized by multiple blocks (i.e., at least two blocks) or segments of two or more polymerized monomer units differing in chemical or physical properties (blocked interpolymer), most preferably a multi-block copolymer, said block interpolymer having a peak (but not just a molecular fraction) which elutes between 40° C. and 130° C. (but without collecting and/or isolating individual fractions), characterized in that said peak, has a comonomer content estimated by infra-red spectroscopy when expanded using a full width/half maximum (FWHM) area calculation, has an average molar comonomer content higher, preferably at least 5 percent higher, more preferably at least 10 percent higher, than that of a comparable random ethylene interpolymer peak at the same elution temperature and expanded using a full width/half maximum (FWHM) area calculation, wherein said comparable random ethylene interpolymer has the same comonomer(s) and has a melt index, density, and molar comonomer content (based on the whole polymer) within 10 percent of that of the blocked interpolymer. Preferably, the Mw/Mn of the comparable interpolymer is also within 10 percent of that of the blocked interpolymer and/or the comparable interpolymer has a total comonomer content within 10 weight percent of that of the blocked interpolymer. The full width/half maximum (FWHM) calculation is based on the ratio of methyl to methylene response area [CH₃/CH₂] from the ATREF infra-red detector, wherein the tallest (highest) peak is identified from the base line, and then the FWHM area is determined. For a distribution measured using an ATREF peak, the FWHM area is defined as the area under the curve between T₁ and T₂, where T₁ and T₂ are points determined, to the left and right of the ATREF peak, by dividing the peak height by two, and then drawing a line horizontal to the base line, that intersects the left and right portions of the ATREF curve. A calibration curve for comonomer content is made using random ethylene/α-olefin copolymers, plotting comonomer content from NMR versus FWHM area ratio of the TREF peak. For this infra-red method, the calibration curve is generated for the same comonomer type of interest. The comonomer content of TREF peak of the inventive polymer can be determined by referencing this calibration curve using its FWHM methyl:methylene area ratio [CH₃/CH₂] of the TREF peak.

Comonomer content may be measured using any suitable technique, with techniques based on nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy preferred. Using this technique, said blocked interpolymers have a higher molar comonomer content than a corresponding comparable interpolymer.

Preferably, for interpolymers of ethylene and 1-octene, the block interpolymer has a comonomer content of the TREF fraction eluting between 40 and 130° C. greater than or equal to the quantity (−0.2013)T+20.07, more preferably greater than or equal to the quantity (−0.2013)T+21.07, where T is the numerical value of the peak elution temperature of the TREF fraction being compared, measured in ° C.

FIG. 4 graphically depicts an embodiment of the block interpolymers of ethylene and 1-octene where a plot of the comonomer content versus TREF elution temperature for several comparable ethylene/1-octene interpolymers (random copolymers) are fit to a line representing (−0.2013)T+20.07 (solid line). The line for the equation (−0.2013)T+21.07 is depicted by a dotted line. Also depicted are the comonomer contents for fractions of several block ethylene/1-octene interpolymers of the invention (multi-block copolymers). All of the block interpolymer fractions have significantly higher 1-octene content than either line at equivalent elution temperatures. This result is characteristic of the inventive interpolymer and is believed to be due to the presence of differentiated blocks within the polymer chains, having both crystalline and amorphous nature.

FIG. 5 graphically displays the TREF curve and comonomer contents of polymer fractions for Example 5 and comparative F to be discussed below. The peak eluting from 40 to 130° C., preferably from 60° C. to 95° C. for both polymers is fractionated into three parts, each part eluting over a temperature range of less than 10° C. Actual data for Example 5 is represented by triangles. The skilled artisan can appreciate that an appropriate calibration curve may be constructed for interpolymers containing different comonomers and a line used as a comparison fitted to the TREF values obtained from comparative interpolymers of the same monomers, preferably random copolymers made using a metallocene or other homogeneous catalyst composition. Inventive interpolymers are characterized by a molar comonomer content greater than the value determined from the calibration curve at the same TREF elution temperature, preferably at least 5 percent greater, more preferably at least 10 percent greater.

In addition to the above aspects and properties described herein, the inventive polymers can be characterized by one or more additional characteristics. In one aspect, the inventive polymer is an olefin interpolymer, preferably comprising ethylene and one or more copolymerizable comonomers in polymerized form, characterized by multiple blocks or segments of two or more polymerized monomer units differing in chemical or physical properties (blocked interpolymer), most preferably a multi-block copolymer, said block interpolymer having a molecular fraction which elutes between 40° C. and 130° C., when fractionated using TREF increments, characterized in that said fraction has a molar comonomer content higher, preferably at least 5 percent higher, more preferably at least 10, 15, 20 or 25 percent higher, than that of a comparable random ethylene interpolymer fraction eluting between the same temperatures, wherein said comparable random ethylene interpolymer comprises the same comonomer(s), preferably it is the same comonomer(s), and a melt index, density, and molar comonomer content (based on the whole polymer) within 10 percent of that of the blocked interpolymer. Preferably, the Mw/Mn of the comparable interpolymer is also within 10 percent of that of the blocked interpolymer and/or the comparable interpolymer has a total comonomer content within 10 weight percent of that of the blocked interpolymer.

Preferably, the above interpolymers are interpolymers of ethylene and at least one α-olefin, especially those interpolymers having a whole polymer density from about 0.855 to about 0.935 g/cm³, and more especially for polymers having more than about 1 mole percent comonomer, the blocked interpolymer has a comonomer content of the TREF fraction eluting between 40 and 130° C. greater than or equal to the quantity (−0.1356)T+13.89, more preferably greater than or equal to the quantity (−0.1356)T+14.93, and most preferably greater than or equal to the quantity (−0.2013)T+21.07, where T is the numerical value of the peak ATREF elution temperature of the TREF fraction being compared, measured in ° C.

Preferably, for the above interpolymers of ethylene and at least one alpha-olefin, especially those interpolymers having a whole polymer density from about 0.855 to about 0.935 g/cm³, and more especially for polymers having more than about 1 mole percent comonomer, the blocked interpolymer has a comonomer content of the TREF fraction eluting between 40 and 130° C. greater than or equal to the quantity (−0.2013)T+20.07, more preferably greater than or equal to the quantity (−0.2013)T+21.07, where T is the numerical value of the peak elution temperature of the TREF fraction being compared, measured in ° C.

In still another aspect, the inventive polymer is an olefin interpolymer, preferably comprising ethylene and one or more copolymerizable comonomers in polymerized form, characterized by multiple blocks or segments of two or more polymerized monomer units differing in chemical or physical properties (blocked interpolymer), most preferably a multi-block copolymer, said block interpolymer having a molecular fraction which elutes between 40° C. and 130° C., when fractionated using TREF increments, characterized in that every fraction having a comonomer content of at least about 6 mole percent, has a melting point greater than about 100° C. For those fractions having a comonomer content from about 3 mole percent to about 6 mole percent, every fraction has a DSC melting point of about 110° C. or higher. More preferably, said polymer fractions, having at least 1 mol percent comonomer, has a DSC melting point that corresponds to the equation: Tm≧(−5.5926)(mol percent comonomer in the fraction)+135.90.

In yet another aspect, the inventive polymer is an olefin interpolymer, preferably comprising ethylene and one or more copolymerizable comonomers in polymerized form, characterized by multiple blocks or segments of two or more polymerized monomer units differing in chemical or physical properties (blocked interpolymer), most preferably a multi-block copolymer, said block interpolymer having a molecular fraction which elutes between 40° C. and 130° C., when fractionated using TREF increments, characterized in that every fraction that has an ATREF elution temperature greater than or equal to about 76° C., has a melt enthalpy (heat of fusion) as measured by DSC, corresponding to the equation: Heat of fusion(J/gm)≦(3.1718)(ATREF elution temperature in Celsius)−136.58.

The inventive block interpolymers have a molecular fraction which elutes between 40° C. and 130° C., when fractionated using TREF increments, characterized in that every fraction that has an ATREF elution temperature between 40° C. and less than about 76° C., has a melt enthalpy (heat of fusion) as measured by DSC, corresponding to the equation: Heat of fusion(J/gm)≦(1.1312)(ATREF elution temperature in Celsius)+22.97. ATREF Peak Comonomer Composition Measurement by Infra-Red Detector

The comonomer composition of the TREF peak can be measured using an IR4 infra-red detector available from Polymer Char, Valencia, Spain (http://www.polymerchar.com/).

The “composition mode” of the detector is equipped with a measurement sensor (CH₂) and composition sensor (CH₃) that are fixed narrow band infra-red filters in the region of 2800-3000 cm⁻¹. The measurement sensor detects the methylene (CH₂) carbons on the polymer (which directly relates to the polymer concentration in solution) while the composition sensor detects the methyl (CH₃) groups of the polymer. The mathematical ratio of the composition signal (CH₃) divided by the measurement signal (CH₂) is sensitive to the comonomer content of the measured polymer in solution and its response is calibrated with known ethylene alpha-olefin copolymer standards.

The detector when used with an ATREF instrument provides both a concentration (CH₂) and composition (CH₃) signal response of the eluted polymer during the TREF process. A polymer specific calibration can be created by measuring the area ratio of the CH₃ to CH₂ for polymers with known comonomer content (preferably measured by NMR). The comonomer content of an ATREF peak of a polymer can be estimated by applying the reference calibration of the ratio of the areas for the individual CH₃ and CH₂ response (i.e. area ratio CH₃/CH₂ versus comonomer content).

The area of the peaks can be calculated using a full width/half maximum (FWHM) calculation after applying the appropriate baselines to integrate the individual signal responses from the TREF chromatogram. The full width/half maximum calculation is based on the ratio of methyl to methylene response area [CH₃/CH₂] from the ATREF infra-red detector, wherein the tallest (highest) peak is identified from the base line, and then the FWHM area is determined. For a distribution measured using an ATREF peak, the FWHM area is defined as the area under the curve between T1 and T2, where T1 and T2 are points determined, to the left and right of the ATREF peak, by dividing the peak height by two, and then drawing a line horizontal to the base line, that intersects the left and right portions of the ATREF curve.

The application of infra-red spectroscopy to measure the comonomer content of polymers in this ATREF-infra-red method is, in principle, similar to that of GPC/FTIR systems as described in the following references: Markovich, Ronald P.; Hazlitt, Lonnie G.; Smith, Linley; “Development of gel-permeation chromatography-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy for characterization of ethylene-based polyolefin copolymers”, Polymeric Materials Science and Engineering (1991), 65, 98-100; and Deslauriers, P. J.; Rohlfing, D. C.; Shieh, E. T.; “Quantifying short chain branching microstructures in ethylene-1-olefin copolymers using size exclusion chromatography and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (SEC-FTIR)”, Polymer (2002), 43, 59-170, both of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.

The ethylene/α-olefin interpolymers may also be characterized by an average block index, ABI, which is greater than zero and up to about 1.0 and a molecular weight distribution, M_(w)/M_(n), greater than about 1.3. The average block index, ABI, is the weight average of the block index (“BI”) for each of the polymer fractions obtained in preparative TREF (i.e., fractionation of a polymer by Temperature Rising Elution Fractionation) from 20° C. and 110° C., with an increment of 5° C. (although other temperature increments, such as 1° C., 2° C., 10° C., also can be used): ABI=Σ(w _(i)BI_(i))

where BI_(i) is the block index for the ith fraction of the inventive ethylene/α-olefin interpolymer obtained in preparative TREF, and w_(i) is the weight percentage of the ith fraction. Similarly, the square root of the second moment about the mean, hereinafter referred to as the second moment weight average block index, can be defined as follows.

${2^{nd}\mspace{14mu}{moment}\mspace{14mu}{weight}\mspace{14mu}{average}\mspace{14mu}{BI}} = \sqrt{\frac{\sum\left( {w_{i}\left( {{BI}_{i} - {ABI}} \right)}^{2} \right)}{\frac{\left( {N - 1} \right){\sum w_{i}}}{N}}}$

where N is defined as the number of fractions with BI_(i) greater than zero. Referring to FIG. 9, for each polymer fraction, BI is defined by one of the two following equations (both of which give the same BI value):

${BI} = {{\frac{{1/T_{X}} - {1/T_{XO}}}{{1/T_{A}} - {1/T_{AB}}}\mspace{14mu}{or}\mspace{14mu}{BI}} = {- \;\frac{{{Ln}\; P_{X}} - {{Ln}\; P_{XO}}}{{{Ln}\; P_{A}} - {{Ln}\; P_{AB}}}}}$ where T_(x) is the ATREF (i.e., analytical TREF) elution temperature for the ith fraction (preferably expressed in Kelvin), P_(x) is the ethylene mole fraction for the ith fraction, which can be measured by NMR or IR as described below. P_(AB) is the ethylene mole fraction of the whole ethylene/α-olefin interpolymer (before fractionation), which also can be measured by NMR or IR. T_(A) and P_(A) are the ATREF elution temperature and the ethylene mole fraction for pure “hard segments” (which refer to the crystalline segments of the interpolymer). As an approximation or for polymers where the “hard segment” composition is unknown, the T_(A) and P_(A) values are set to those for high density polyethylene homopolymer. For calculations performed herein, T_(A) is 372 K, P_(A) is 1.

TAB is the ATREF elution temperature for a random copolymer of the same composition (having an ethylene mole fraction of P_(AB)) and molecular weight as the inventive copolymer. TAB can be calculated from the mole fraction of ethylene (measured by NMR) using the following equation: Ln P _(AB) =α/T _(AB)+β where α and β are two constants which can be determined by a calibration using a number of well characterized preparative TREF fractions of a broad composition random copolymer and/or well characterized random ethylene copolymers with narrow composition. It should be noted that α and β may vary from instrument to instrument. Moreover, one would need to create an appropriate calibration curve with the polymer composition of interest, using appropriate molecular weight ranges and comonomer type for the preparative TREF fractions and/or random copolymers used to create the calibration. There is a slight molecular weight effect. If the calibration curve is obtained from similar molecular weight ranges, such effect would be essentially negligible. In some embodiments as illustrated in FIG. 8, random ethylene copolymers and/or preparative TREF fractions of random copolymers satisfy the following relationship: Ln P=−237.83/T _(ATREF)+0.639

The above calibration equation relates the mole fraction of ethylene, P, to the analytical TREF elution temperature, T_(ATREF), for narrow composition random copolymers and/or preparative TREF fractions of broad composition random copolymers. T_(XO) is the ATREF temperature for a random copolymer of the same composition (i.e., the same comonomer type and content) and the same molecular weight and having an ethylene mole fraction of P_(x). T_(XO) can be calculated from LnP_(x)=α/T_(XO)+β from a measured P_(X) mole fraction. Conversely, P_(XO) is the ethylene mole fraction for a random copolymer of the same composition (i.e., the same comonomer type and content) and the same molecular weight and having an ATREF temperature of T_(X), which can be calculated from Ln P_(XO)=α/T_(X)+β using a measured value of T_(X).

Once the block index (BI) for each preparative TREF fraction is obtained, the weight average block index, ABI, for the whole polymer can be calculated. In some embodiments, ABI is greater than zero but less than about 0.4 or from about 0.1 to about 0.3. In other embodiments, ABI is greater than about 0.4 and up to about 1.0. Preferably, ABI should be in the range of from about 0.4 to about 0.7, from about 0.5 to about 0.7, or from about 0.6 to about 0.9. In some embodiments, ABI is in the range of from about 0.3 to about 0.9, from about 0.3 to about 0.8, or from about 0.3 to about 0.7, from about 0.3 to about 0.6, from about 0.3 to about 0.5, or from about 0.3 to about 0.4. In other embodiments, ABI is in the range of from about 0.4 to about 1.0, from about 0.5 to about 1.0, or from about 0.6 to about 1.0, from about 0.7 to about 1.0, from about 0.8 to about 1.0, or from about 0.9 to about 1.0.

Another characteristic of the inventive ethylene/α-olefin interpolymer is that the inventive ethylene/α-olefin interpolymer comprises at least one polymer fraction which can be obtained by preparative TREF, wherein the fraction has a block index greater than about 0.1 and up to about 1.0 and the polymer having a molecular weight distribution, M_(w)/M_(n), greater than about 1.3. In some embodiments, the polymer fraction has a block index greater than about 0.6 and up to about 1.0, greater than about 0.7 and up to about 1.0, greater than about 0.8 and up to about 1.0, or greater than about 0.9 and up to about 1.0. In other embodiments, the polymer fraction has a block index greater than about 0.1 and up to about 1.0, greater than about 0.2 and up to about 1.0, greater than about 0.3 and up to about 1.0, greater than about 0.4 and up to about 1.0, or greater than about 0.4 and up to about 1.0. In still other embodiments, the polymer fraction has a block index greater than about 0.1 and up to about 0.5, greater than about 0.2 and up to about 0.5, greater than about 0.3 and up to about 0.5, or greater than about 0.4 and up to about 0.5. In yet other embodiments, the polymer fraction has a block index greater than about 0.2 and up to about 0.9, greater than about 0.3 and up to about 0.8, greater than about 0.4 and up to about 0.7, or greater than about 0.5 and up to about 0.6.

In addition to an average block index and individual fraction block indices, the ethylene/α-olefin interpolymers are characterized by one or more of the properties described as follows.

For copolymers of ethylene and an α-olefin, the inventive polymers preferably possess (1) a PDI of at least 1.3, more preferably at least 1.5, at least 1.7, or at least 2.0, and most preferably at least 2.6, up to a maximum value of 5.0, more preferably up to a maximum of 3.5, and especially up to a maximum of 2.7; (2) a heat of fusion of 80 J/g or less; (3) an ethylene content of at least 50 weight percent; (4) a glass transition temperature, T_(g), of less than −25° C., more preferably less than −30° C., and/or (5) one and only one T_(m).

Further, the inventive polymers can have, alone or in combination with any other properties disclosed herein, a storage modulus, G′, such that log (G′) is greater than or equal to 400 kPa, preferably greater than or equal to 1.0 MPa, at a temperature of 100° C. Moreover, the inventive polymers possess a relatively flat storage modulus as a function of temperature in the range from 0 to 100° C. (illustrated in FIG. 6) that is characteristic of block copolymers, and heretofore unknown for an olefin copolymer, especially a copolymer of ethylene and one or more C₃₋₈ aliphatic α-olefins. (By the term “relatively flat” in this context is meant that log G′ (in Pascals) decreases by less than one order of magnitude between 50 and 100° C., preferably between 0 and 100° C.).

The inventive interpolymers may be further characterized by a thermomechanical analysis (TMA) penetration depth of 1 mm at a temperature of at least 90° C. as well as a flexural modulus (ASTM D790A) of from 3 kpsi (20 MPa) to 13 kpsi (90 MPa). Alternatively, the inventive interpolymers can have a thermomechanical analysis penetration depth of 1 mm at a temperature of at least 104° C. as well as a flexural modulus of at least 3 kpsi (20 MPa). They may be characterized as having an abrasion resistance (or volume loss) of less than 90 mm³. FIG. 7 shows the TMA (1 mm) versus flex modulus for the inventive polymers, as compared to other known polymers. The inventive polymers have significantly better flexibility-heat resistance balance than the other polymers.

Additionally, the ethylene/α-olefin interpolymers can have a melt index, I₂, from 0.01 to 2000 g/10 minutes, preferably from 0.01 to 1000 g/10 minutes, more preferably from 0.01 to 500 g/10 minutes, and especially from 0.01 to 100 g/10 minutes. In certain embodiments, the ethylene/α-olefin interpolymers have a melt index, I₂, from 0.01 to 10 g/10 minutes, from 0.5 to 50 g/10 minutes, from 1 to 30 g/10 minutes, from 6 g/10 minutes or from 0.3 to 10 g/10 minutes. In certain embodiments, the melt index for the ethylene/α-olefin polymers is 1 g/10 minutes, 5 g/10 minutes 10 g/10, 15 g/10 minutes, 20 g/10 min or 24 g/10 min.

The polymers can have molecular weights, M_(w), from 1,000 g/mole to 5,000,000 g/mole, preferably from 1000 g/mole to 1,000,000, more preferably from 10,000 g/mole to 500,000 g/mole, and especially from 10,000 g/mole to 300,000 g/mole. The density of the inventive polymers can be from 0.80 to 0.99 g/cm³ and preferably for ethylene containing polymers from 0.85 g/cm³ to 0.97 g/cm³. In certain embodiments, the density of the ethylene/α-olefin polymers ranges from 0.860 to 0.925 g/cm³ or 0.867 to 0.910 g/cm³. In certain embodiments, the density of the ethylene/α-olefin polymers is from about 0.860 to 0.900 g/cm³, preferably from about 0.860 to 0.885 g/cm³, more preferably from about 0.860 to 0.883 g/cm³, and most preferably from about 0.863 to 0.880 g/cm³.

The process of making the polymers has been disclosed in the following patent applications: U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/553,906, filed Mar. 17, 2004; U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/662,937, filed Mar. 17, 2005; U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/662,939, filed Mar. 17, 2005; U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/5662938, filed Mar. 17, 2005; PCT Application No. PCT/US2005/008916, filed Mar. 17, 2005; PCT Application No. PCT/US2005/008915, filed Mar. 17, 2005; and PCT Application No. PCT/US2005/008917, filed Mar. 17, 2005, all of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety. For example, one such method comprises contacting ethylene and optionally one or more addition polymerizable monomers other than ethylene under addition polymerization conditions with a catalyst composition comprising:

the admixture or reaction product resulting from combining:

(A) a first olefin polymerization catalyst having a high comonomer incorporation index,

(B) a second olefin polymerization catalyst having a comonomer incorporation index less than 90 percent, preferably less than 50 percent, most preferably less than 5 percent of the comonomer incorporation index of catalyst (A), and

(C) a chain shuttling agent.

Representative catalysts and chain shuttling agent are as follows.

Catalyst (A1) is [N-(2,6-di(1-methylethyl)phenyl)amido)(2-isopropylphenyl)(α-naphthalen-2-diyl(6-pyridin-2-diyl)methane)]hafnium dimethyl, prepared according to the teachings of WO 03/40195, 2003US0204017, U.S. Ser. No. 10/429,024, filed May 2, 2003, and WO 04/24740.

Catalyst (A2) is [N-(2,6-di(1-methylethyl)phenyl)amido)(2-methylphenyl)(1,2-phenylene-(6-pyridin-2-diyl)methane)]hafnium dimethyl, prepared according to the teachings of WO 03/40195, 2003US0204017, U.S. Ser. No. 10/429,024, filed May 2, 2003, and WO 04/24740.

Catalyst (A3) is bis[N,N′″-(2,4,6-tri(methylphenyl)amido)ethylenediamine]hafnium dibenzyl.

Catalyst (A4) is bis((2-oxoyl-3-(dibenzo-1H-pyrrole-1-yl)-5-(methyl)phenyl)-2-phenoxymethyl)cyclohexane-1,2-diyl zirconium (IV) dibenzyl, prepared substantially according to the teachings of US-A-2004/0010103.

Catalyst (B1) is 1,2-bis-(3,5-di-t-butylphenylene)(1-(N-(1-methylethyl)immino)methyl)(2-oxoyl) zirconium dibenzyl

Catalyst (B2) is 1,2-bis-(3,5-di-t-butylphenylene)(1-(N-(2-methylcyclohexyl)-immino)methyl)(2-oxoyl)zirconium dibenzyl

Catalyst (C1) is (t-butylamido)dimethyl(3-N-pyrrolyl-1,2,3,3a,7a-η-inden-1-yl)silanetitanium dimethyl prepared substantially according to the techniques of U.S. Pat. No. 6,268,444:

Catalyst (C2) is (t-butylamido)di(4-methylphenyl)(2-methyl-1,2,3,3a,7a-η-inden-1-yl)silanetitanium dimethyl prepared substantially according to the teachings of US-A-2003/004286:

Catalyst (C3) is (t-butylamido)di(4-methylphenyl)(2-methyl-1,2,3,3a,8a-η-s-indacen-1-yl)silanetitanium dimethyl prepared substantially according to the teachings of US-A-2003/004286:

Catalyst (D1) is bis(dimethyldisiloxane)(indene-1-yl)zirconium dichloride available from Sigma-Aldrich:

Shuttling Agents The shuttling agents employed include diethylzinc, di(i-butyl)zinc, di(n-hexyl)zinc, triethylaluminum, trioctylaluminum, triethylgallium, i-butylaluminum bis(dimethyl(t-butyl)siloxane), i-butylaluminum bis(di(trimethylsilyl)amide), n-octylaluminum di(pyridine-2-methoxide), bis(n-octadecyl)i-butylaluminum, i-butylaluminum bis(di(n-pentyl)amide), n-octylaluminum bis(2,6-di-t-butylphenoxide, n-octylaluminum di(ethyl(1-naphthyl)amide), ethylaluminum bis(t-butyldimethylsiloxie), ethylaluninum di(bis(trimethylsilyl)amide), ethylaluminum bis(2,3,6,7-dibenzo-1-azacycloheptaneamide), n-octylaluminum bis(2,3,6,7-dibenzo-1-azacycloheptaneamide), n-octylaluminum bis(dimethyl(t-butyl)siloxide, ethylzinc (2,6-diphenylphenoxide), and ethylzinc (t-butoxide).

Preferably, the foregoing process takes the form of a continuous solution process for forming block copolymers, especially multi-block copolymers, preferably linear multi-block copolymers of two or more monomers, more especially ethylene and a C₃₋₂₀ olefin or cycloolefin, and most especially ethylene and a C₄₋₂₀ α-olefin, using multiple catalysts that are incapable of interconversion. That is, the catalysts are chemically distinct. Under continuous solution polymerization conditions, the process is ideally suited for polymerization of mixtures of monomers at high monomer conversions. Under these polymerization conditions, shuttling from the chain shuttling agent to the catalyst becomes advantaged compared to chain growth, and multi-block copolymers, especially linear multi-block copolymers are formed in high efficiency.

The inventive interpolymers may be differentiated from conventional, random copolymers, physical blends of polymers, and block copolymers prepared via sequential monomer addition, fluxional catalysts, anionic or cationic living polymerization techniques. In particular, compared to a random copolymer of the same monomers and monomer content at equivalent crystallinity or modulus, the inventive interpolymers have better (higher) heat resistance as measured by melting point, higher TMA penetration temperature, higher high-temperature tensile strength, and/or higher high-temperature torsion storage modulus as determined by dynamic mechanical analysis. Compared to a random copolymer containing the same monomers and monomer content, the inventive interpolymers have lower compression set, particularly at elevated temperatures, lower stress relaxation, higher creep resistance, higher tear strength, higher blocking resistance, faster setup due to higher crystallization (solidification) temperature, higher recovery (particularly at elevated temperatures), better abrasion resistance, higher retractive force, and better oil and filler acceptance.

The inventive interpolymers also exhibit a unique crystallization and branching distribution relationship. That is, the inventive interpolymers have a relatively large difference between the tallest peak temperature measured using CRYSTAF and DSC as a function of heat of fusion, especially as compared to random copolymers containing the same monomers and monomer level or physical blends of polymers, such as a blend of a high density polymer and a lower density copolymer, at equivalent overall density. It is believed that this unique feature of the inventive interpolymers is due to the unique distribution of the comonomer in blocks within the polymer backbone. In particular, the inventive interpolymers may comprise alternating blocks of differing comonomer content (including homopolymer blocks). The inventive interpolymers may also comprise a distribution in number and/or block size of polymer blocks of differing density or comonomer content, which is a Schultz-Flory type of distribution. In addition, the inventive interpolymers also have a unique peak melting point and crystallization temperature profile that is substantially independent of polymer density, modulus, and morphology. In a preferred embodiment, the microcrystalline order of the polymers demonstrates characteristic spherulites and lamellae that are distinguishable from random or block copolymers, even at PDI values that are less than 1.7, or even less than 1.5, down to less than 1.3.

Furthermore, by combining ethylene α-olefins with styrenic block copolymers, disadvantages associated with using styrenic block copolymer formulations may be mitigated. For example, thermal instability is associated with certain styrenic block copolymers. One example is styrene-isoprene-styrene (SIS). If processed at excessively high temperatures, SIS is known to undergo chain scission. This can result in significant decreases in viscosity and loss of mechanical properties. Another example is styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS). If processed at excessively high temperatures, SBS is known to undergo cross-linking. This can result in significant increases in viscosity and gel formation. As a result, limitations such as these can result in disadvantaged performance. Formulation with ethylene α-olefins can mitigate these disadvantages.

Moreover, the inventive interpolymers may be prepared using techniques to influence the degree or level of blockiness. That is, the amount of comonomer and length of each polymer block or segment can be altered by controlling the ratio and type of catalysts and shuttling agent as well as the temperature of the polymerization, and other polymerization variables. A surprising benefit of this phenomenon is the discovery that as the degree of blockiness is increased, the optical properties, tear strength, and high temperature recovery properties of the resulting polymer are improved. In particular, haze decreases while clarity, tear strength, and high temperature recovery properties increase as the average number of blocks in the polymer increases. By selecting shuttling agents and catalyst combinations having the desired chain transferring ability (high rates of shuttling with low levels of chain termination) other forms of polymer termination are effectively suppressed. Accordingly, little if any β-hydride elimination is observed in the polymerization of ethylene/α-olefin comonomer mixtures according to embodiments of the invention, and the resulting crystalline blocks are highly, or substantially completely, linear, possessing little or no long chain branching.

Polymers with highly crystalline chain ends can be selectively prepared in accordance with embodiments of the invention. In elastomer applications, reducing the relative quantity of polymer that terminates with an amorphous block reduces the intermolecular dilutive effect on crystalline regions. This result can be obtained by choosing chain shuttling agents and catalysts having an appropriate response to hydrogen or other chain terminating agents. Specifically, if the catalyst which produces highly crystalline polymer is more susceptible to chain termination (such as by use of hydrogen) than the catalyst responsible for producing the less crystalline polymer segment (such as through higher comonomer incorporation, regio-error, or atactic polymer formation), then the highly crystalline polymer segments will preferentially populate the terminal portions of the polymer. Not only are the resulting terminated groups crystalline, but upon termination, the highly crystalline polymer forming catalyst site is once again available for reinitiation of polymer formation. The initially formed polymer is therefore another highly crystalline polymer segment. Accordingly, both ends of the resulting multi-block copolymer are preferentially highly crystalline.

The ethylene α-olefin interpolymers used in the embodiments of the invention are preferably interpolymers of ethylene with at least one C₃-C₂₀ α-olefin. Copolymers of ethylene and a C₃-C₂₀ α-olefin are especially preferred. The interpolymers may further comprise C₄-C₁₈ diolefin and/or alkenylbenzene. Suitable unsaturated comonomers useful for polymerizing with ethylene include, for example, ethylenically unsaturated monomers, conjugated or nonconjugated dienes, polyenes, alkenylbenzenes, etc. Examples of such comonomers include C₃-C₂₀ α-olefins such as propylene, isobutylene, 1-butene, 1-hexene, 1-pentene, 4-methyl-1-pentene, 1-heptene, 1-octene, 1-nonene, 1-decene, and the like. 1-Butene and 1-octene are especially preferred. Other suitable monomers include styrene, halo- or alkyl-substituted styrenes, vinylbenzocyclobutane, 1,4-hexadiene, 1,7-octadiene, and naphthenics (e.g., cyclopentene, cyclohexene and cyclooctene).

While ethylene/α-olefin interpolymers are preferred polymers, other ethylene/olefin polymers may also be used. Olefins as used herein refer to a family of unsaturated hydrocarbon-based compounds with at least one carbon-carbon double bond. Depending on the selection of catalysts, any olefin may be used in embodiments of the invention. Preferably, suitable olefins are C₃-C₂₀ aliphatic and aromatic compounds containing vinylic unsaturation, as well as cyclic compounds, such as cyclobutene, cyclopentene, dicyclopentadiene, and norbomene, including but not limited to, norbomene substituted in the 5 and 6 position with C₁-C₂₀ hydrocarbyl or cyclohydrocarbyl groups. Also included are mixtures of such olefins as well as mixtures of such olefins with C₄-C₄₀ diolefin compounds.

Examples of olefin monomers include, but are not limited to propylene, isobutylene, 1-butene, 1-pentene, 1-hexene, 1-heptene, 1-octene, 1-nonene, 1-decene, and 1-dodecene, 1-tetradecene, 1-hexadecene, 1-octadecene, 1-eicosene, 3-methyl-1-butene, 3-methyl-1-pentene, 4-methyl-1-pentene, 4,6-dimethyl-1-heptene, 4-vinylcyclohexene, vinylcyclohexane, norbornadiene, ethylidene norbomene, cyclopentene, cyclohexene, dicyclopentadiene, cyclooctene, C₄-C₄₀ dienes, including but not limited to 1,3-butadiene, 1,3-pentadiene, 1,4-hexadiene, 1,5-hexadiene, 1,7-octadiene, 1,9-decadiene, other C₄-C₄₀ α-olefins, and the like. In certain embodiments, the α-olefin is propylene, 1-butene, 1-pentene, 1-hexene, 1-octene or a combination thereof. Although any hydrocarbon containing a vinyl group potentially may be used in embodiments of the invention, practical issues such as monomer availability, cost, and the ability to conveniently remove unreacted monomer from the resulting polymer may become more problematic as the molecular weight of the monomer becomes too high.

The polymerization processes described herein are well suited for the production of olefin polymers comprising monovinylidene aromatic monomers including styrene, o-methyl styrene, p-methyl styrene, t-butylstyrene, and the like. In particular, interpolymers comprising ethylene and styrene can be prepared by following the teachings herein. Optionally, copolymers comprising ethylene, styrene and a C₃-C₂₀ alpha olefin, optionally comprising a C₄-C₂₀ diene, having improved properties can be prepared.

Suitable non-conjugated diene monomers can be a straight chain, branched chain or cyclic hydrocarbon diene having from 6 to 15 carbon atoms. Examples of suitable non-conjugated dienes include, but are not limited to, straight chain acyclic dienes, such as 1,4-hexadiene, 1,6-octadiene, 1,7-octadiene, 1,9-decadiene, branched chain acyclic dienes, such as 5-methyl-1,4-hexadiene; 3,7-dimethyl-1,6-octadiene; 3,7-dimethyl-1,7-octadiene and mixed isomers of dihydromyricene and dihydroocinene, single ring alicyclic dienes, such as 1,3-cyclopentadiene; 1,4-cyclohexadiene; 1,5-cyclooctadiene and 1,5-cyclododecadiene, and multi-ring alicyclic fused and bridged ring dienes, such as tetrahydroindene, methyl tetrahydroindene, dicyclopentadiene, bicyclo-(2,2,1)-hepta-2,5-diene; alkenyl, alkylidene, cycloalkenyl and cycloalkylidene norbomenes, such as 5-methylene-2-norbornene (MNB); 5-propenyl-2-norbomene, 5-isopropylidene-2-norbomene, 5-(4-cyclopentenyl)-2-norbornene, 5-cyclohexylidene-2-norbomene, 5-vinyl-2-norbomene, and norbornadiene. Of the dienes typically used to prepare EPDMs, the particularly preferred dienes are 1,4-hexadiene (HD), 5-ethylidene-2-norbornene (ENB), 5-vinylidene-2-norbornene (VNB), 5-methylene-2-norbomene (MNB), and dicyclopentadiene (DCPD). The especially preferred dienes are 5-ethylidene-2-norbornene (ENB) and 1,4-hexadiene (HD).

One class of desirable polymers that can be made in accordance with embodiments of the invention are elastomeric interpolymers of ethylene, a C₃-C₂₀ α-olefin, especially propylene, and optionally one or more diene monomers. Preferred α-olefins for use in this embodiment of the present invention are designated by the formula CH₂═CHR*, where R* is a linear or branched alkyl group of from 1 to 12 carbon atoms. Examples of suitable α-olefins include, but are not limited to, propylene, isobutylene, 1-butene, 1-pentene, 1-hexene, 4-methyl-1-pentene, and 1-octene. A particularly preferred α-olefin is propylene. The propylene based polymers are generally referred to in the art as EP or EPDM polymers. Suitable dienes for use in preparing such polymers, especially multi-block EPDM type polymers include conjugated or non-conjugated, straight or branched chain-, cyclic- or polycyclic-dienes comprising from 4 to 20 carbons. Preferred dienes include 1,4-pentadiene, 1,4-hexadiene, 5-ethylidene-2-norbornene, dicyclopentadiene, cyclohexadiene, and 5-butylidene-2-norbornene. A particularly preferred diene is 5-ethylidene-2-norbornene.

Because the diene containing polymers comprise alternating segments or blocks containing greater or lesser quantities of the diene (including none) and α-olefin (including none), the total quantity of diene and α-olefin may be reduced without loss of subsequent polymer properties. That is, because the diene and α-olefin monomers are preferentially incorporated into one type of block of the polymer rather than uniformly or randomly throughout the polymer, they are more efficiently utilized and subsequently the crosslink density of the polymer can be better controlled. Such crosslinkable elastomers and the cured products have advantaged properties, including higher tensile strength and better elastic recovery.

In some embodiments, the inventive interpolymers made with two catalysts incorporating differing quantities of comonomer have a weight ratio of blocks formed thereby from 95:5 to 5:95. The elastomeric polymers desirably have an ethylene content of from 20 to 90 percent, a diene content of from 0.1 to 10 percent, and an α-olefin content of from 10 to 80 percent, based on the total weight of the polymer. Further preferably, the multi-block elastomeric polymers have an ethylene content of from 60 to 90 percent, a diene content of from 0.1 to 10 percent, and an α-olefin content of from 10 to 40 percent, based on the total weight of the polymer. Preferred polymers are high molecular weight polymers, having a weight average molecular weight (Mw) from 10,000 to about 2,500,000, preferably from 20,000 to 500,000, more preferably from 20,000 to 350,000, and a polydispersity less than 3.5, more preferably less than 3.0, and a Mooney viscosity (ML(1+4) 125° C.) from 1 to 250. More preferably, such polymers have an ethylene content from 65 to 75 percent, a diene content from 0 to 6 percent, and an α-olefin content from 20 to 35 percent.

The ethylene/α-olefin interpolymers can be functionalized by incorporating at least one functional group in its polymer structure. Exemplary functional groups may include, for example, ethylenically unsaturated mono- and di-functional carboxylic acids, ethylenically unsaturated mono- and di-functional carboxylic acid anhydrides, salts thereof and esters thereof. Such functional groups may be grafted to an ethylene/α-olefin interpolymer, or it may be copolymerized with ethylene and an optional additional comonomer to form an interpolymer of ethylene, the functional comonomer and optionally other comonomer(s). Means for grafting functional groups onto polyethylene are described for example in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,762,890, 4,927,888, and 4,950,541, the disclosures of these patents are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. One particularly useful functional group is malic anhydride.

The amount of the functional group present in the functional interpolymer can vary. The functional group can typically be present in a copolymer-type functionalized interpolymer in an amount of at least about 1.0 weight percent, preferably at least about 5 weight percent, and more preferably at least about 7 weight percent. The functional group will typically be present in a copolymer-type functionalized interpolymer in an amount less than about 40 weight percent, preferably less than about 30 weight percent, and more preferably less than about 25 weight percent.

The amount of the ethylene/α-olefin interpolymer in the polymer blend disclosed herein can be from about 5 to about 95 wt %, from about 10 to about 90 wt %, from about 20 to about 80 wt %, from about 30 to about 70 wt %, from about 10 to about 50 wt %, from about 50 to about 90 wt %, from about 60 to about 90 wt %, or from about 70 to about 90 wt % of the total weight of the polymer blend.

More on Block Index

Random copolymers satisfy the following relationship. See P. J. Flory, Trans. Faraday Soc., 51, 848 (1955), which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

$\begin{matrix} {{\frac{1}{T_{m}} - \frac{1}{T_{m}^{0}}} = {{- \left( \frac{R}{\Delta\; H_{u}} \right)}\ln\; P}} & (1) \end{matrix}$

In Equation 1, the mole fraction of crystallizable monomers, P, is related to the melting temperature, T_(m), of the copolymer and the melting temperature of the pure crystallizable homopolymer, T_(m) ⁰. The equation is similar to the relationship for the natural logarithm of the mole fraction of ethylene as a function of the reciprocal of the ATREF elution temperature (° K) as shown in FIG. 8 for various homogeneously branched copolymers of ethylene and olefins.

As illustrated in FIG. 8, the relationship of ethylene mole fraction to ATREF peak elution temperature and DSC melting temperature for various homogeneously branched copolymers is analogous to Flory's equation. Similarly, preparative TREF fractions of nearly all random copolymers and random copolymer blends likewise fall on this line, except for small molecular weight effects.

According to Flory, if P, the mole fraction of ethylene, is equal to the conditional probability that one ethylene unit will precede or follow another ethylene unit, then the polymer is random. On the other hand if the conditional probability that any 2 ethylene units occur sequentially is greater than P, then the copolymer is a block copolymer. The remaining case where the conditional probability is less than P yields alternating copolymers.

The mole fraction of ethylene in random copolymers primarily determines a specific distribution of ethylene segments whose crystallization behavior in turn is governed by the minimum equilibrium crystal thickness at a given temperature. Therefore, the copolymer melting and TREF crystallization temperatures of the inventive block copolymers are related to the magnitude of the deviation from the random relationship in FIG. 8, and such deviation is a useful way to quantify how “blocky” a given TREF fraction is relative to its random equivalent copolymer (or random equivalent TREF fraction). The term “blocky” refers to the extent a particular polymer fraction or polymer comprises blocks of polymerized monomers or comonomers. There are two random equivalents, one corresponding to constant temperature and one corresponding to constant mole fraction of ethylene. These form the sides of a right triangle as shown in FIG. 9, which illustrates the definition of the block index.

In FIG. 9, the point (T_(X), P_(X)) represents a preparative TREF fraction, where the ATREF elution temperature, T_(X), and the NMR ethylene mole fraction, P_(X), are measured values. The ethylene mole fraction of the whole polymer, P_(AB), is also measured by NMR. The “hard segment” elution temperature and mole fraction, (T_(A), P_(A)), can be estimated or else set to that of ethylene homopolymer for ethylene copolymers. The T_(AB) value corresponds to the calculated random copolymer equivalent ATREF elution temperature based on the measured P_(AB). From the measured ATREF elution temperature, T_(X), the corresponding random ethylene mole fraction, P_(X0), can also be calculated. The square of the block index is defined to be the ratio of the area of the (P_(X), T_(X)) triangle and the (T_(A), P_(AB)) triangle. Since the right triangles are similar, the ratio of areas is also the squared ratio of the distances from (T_(A), P_(AB)) and (T_(X), P_(X)) to the random line. In addition, the similarity of the right triangles means the ratio of the lengths of either of the corresponding sides can be used instead of the areas.

${BI} = {{\frac{{1/T_{X}} - {1/T_{XO}}}{{1/T_{A}} - {1/T_{AB}}}\mspace{14mu}{or}\mspace{14mu}{BI}} = {- \;\frac{{{Ln}\; P_{X}} - {{Ln}\; P_{XO}}}{{{Ln}\; P_{A}} - {{Ln}\; P_{AB}}}}}$

It should be noted that the most perfect block distribution would correspond to a whole polymer with a single eluting fraction at the point (T_(A), P_(AB)), because such a polymer would preserve the ethylene segment distribution in the “hard segment”, yet contain all the available octene (presumably in runs that are nearly identical to those produced by the soft segment catalyst). In most cases, the “soft segment” will not crystallize in the ATREF (or preparative TREF).

The Compositions of the Present Invention

The compositions of matter of the present invention comprise the ethylene/α-olefin interpolymer described previously and a styrenic block copolymer. While any density ethylene/α-olefin interpolymer may be useful, in general, the lower the density, the more elastic the polymer will be. It is particularly preferred that the density of the interpolymer be from about 0.85 to 0.900 g/cm³, preferably from about 0.855 to 0.885 g/cm³, more preferably from about 0.860 to 0.883 g/cm³, and most preferably from about 0.863 to 0.880 g/cm³.

The Styrenic Block Copolymer

Examples of styrenic block copolymers suitable for the invention are described in but is not limited to EP0712892 B1; WO204041538 A1; U.S. Pat. No. 6,582,829 B1; US 2004/0087235 A1; US 2004/0122408 A1; US 2004/0122409 A1; U.S. Pat. No. 4,789,699; U.S. Pat. No. 5,093,422; U.S. Pat. No. 5,332,613; U.S. Pat. No. 6,916,750 B2; US 2002/0052585 A1; U.S. Pat. No. 6,323,389 B1; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,169,706, which are incorporated by reference for their teachings regarding styrenic block copolymers.

In general, styrenic block copolymers suitable for the invention have at least two monoalkenyl arene blocks, preferably two polystyrene blocks, separated by a block of saturated conjugated diene comprising less than 20% residual ethylenic unsaturation, preferably a saturated polybutadiene block. The preferred styrenic block copolymers have a linear structure although branched or radial polymers or functionalized block copolymers make useful compounds.

Typically, polystyrene-saturated polybutadiene-polystyrene (S-EB-S) (S is styrene, E is ethylene, and B is butylene) and polystyrene-saturated polyisoprene-polystyrene (S-EP-S) (P is propylene) block copolymers comprise polystyrene endblocks having a number average molecular weight from 5,000 to 35,000 and saturated polybutadiene or saturated polyisoprene midblocks having a number average molecular weight from 20,000 to 170,000. The saturated polybutadiene blocks preferably have from 35% to 55% 1, 2-configuration and the saturated polyisoprene blocks preferably have greater than 85% 1, 4-configuration.

The total number average molecular weight of the styrenic block copolymer is preferably from 30,000 to 250,000 if the copolymer has a linear structure. Such block copolymers typically have an average polystyrene content from 10% by weight to 35% by weight.

A S-EB-S block copolymer useful in a particularly preferred aspect of the present invention is available from KRATON Polymers LLC (Houston, Tex.) and has a number average molecular weight of 50,000 grams per mole with polystyrene endblocks each having a number average molecular weight of 7,200 grams per mole and polystyrene content of 30% by weight.

Styrenic block copolymers may be prepared by methods known to one of ordinary skill in the art. For example, the styrenic block copolymers may be manufactured using free-radical, cationic and anionic initiators or polymerization catalysts. Such polymers may be prepared using bulk, solution or emulsion techniques. In any case, the styrenic block copolymer contains ethylenic unsaturation at a minimum, and generally, will be recovered as a solid such as a crumb, a powder, a pellet, or the like.

In general, when solution anionic techniques are used, conjugated diolefin polymers and copolymers of conjugated diolefins and alkenyl aromatic hydrocarbons are prepared by contacting the monomer or monomers to be polymerized simultaneously or sequentially with an organoalkali metal compound in a suitable solvent at a temperature in the range of from 150° C. to 300° C., preferably at a temperature in the range of from 0° C. to 100° C. Particularly effective anionic polymerization initiators are organolithium compounds having the general formula: RLi_(n) wherein R is an aliphatic, cycloaliphatic, aromatic, or alkyl-substituted aromatic hydrocarbon radical having from 1 to 20 carbon atoms; and n is an integer of 1 to 4.

In addition to sequential techniques to obtain triblocks, tetrablocks, and higher orders of repeating structures, anionic initiators, at a minimum, can be used to prepare diblocks of styrene-polydiene having a reactive (“live”) chain end on the diene block which can be reacted through a coupling agent to create, for example, (S-I)_(x)Y or (S-B)_(x)Y structures wherein x is an integer from 2 to 30, Y is a coupling agent, I is isoprene, B is butadiene and greater than 65 percent of S-I or S-B diblocks are chemically attached to the coupling agent. Y usually has a molecular weight which is low compared to the polymers being prepared and can be any of a number of materials known in the art, including halogenated organic compounds; halogenated alkyl silanes; alkoxy silanes; various esters such as alkyl and aryl benzoates, difunctional aliphatic esters such as dialkyl adipates and the like; polyfunctional agents such as divinyl benzene (DVB) and low molecular weight polymers of DVB. Depending on the selected coupling agent, the final polymer can be a fully or partially coupled linear triblock polymer (x=2), i.e., SIYIS; or in a branched, radial or star configuration. The coupling agent, being of low molecular weight, does not materially affect the properties of the final polymer. DVB oligomer is commonly used to create star polymers, wherein the number of diene arms can be 7 to 20 or even higher.

It is not required in coupled polymers that the diblock units all be identical. In fact, diverse “living” diblock units can be brought together during the coupling reaction giving a variety of unsymmetrical structures, i.e., the total diblock chain lengths can be different, as well as the sequential block lengths of styrene and diene.

Preferably, the styrenic block copolymers are hydrogenated to improve weatherability and oxidation stability. In general, the hydrogenation or selective hydrogenation of the polymer may be accomplished using any of the several hydrogenation processes known in the prior art. For example, the hydrogenation may be accomplished using methods such as those taught, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,494,942; 3,634,594; 3,670,054; 3,700,633; and 27,145, which are incorporated by reference for their teaching regarding hydrogenation of styrenic block copolymers and the polymers that result therefrom. The methods known in the prior art for hydrogenating polymers containing ethylenic unsaturation and for hydrogenating or selectively hydrogenating polymers containing aromatic and ethylenic unsaturation, involve the use of a suitable catalyst, particularly a catalyst or catalyst precursor comprising an iron group metal atom, particularly nickel or cobalt, and a suitable reducing agent such as an aluminum alkyl.

In general, the hydrogenation will be accomplished in a suitable solvent at a temperature in the range of from 20° C. to 100° C. and at a hydrogen partial pressure in the range of from 7 atm (10⁵ Pa) to 340 atm (10⁵ Pa), preferably 7 atm (10⁵ Pa) to 70 atm (10⁵ Pa). Catalyst concentrations are generally in the range of from 10 ppm (wt) to 500 ppm (wt) of iron group metal based on total solution. Contacting at hydrogenation conditions is generally continued for a period of time in the range of from 60 to 240 minutes. After the hydrogenation is completed, the hydrogenation catalyst and catalyst residue will, generally, be separated from the polymer.

Not wishing to be limited by theory, it is thought that the compatibility of the saturated conjugated diene with the interpolymer contributes to the ability of the composition of the present invention to exhibit the novel properties present. This is consistent with other embodiments of the present invention. For example, in a particular embodiment of the present invention, a composition comprises an interpolymer, SIS, and a minor amount of SEBS which is thought to compatiblize the interpolymer and SIS. In another embodiment of the present invention, a composition comprises an interpolymer, SBS, and a minor amount of SEBS which is thought to compatiblize the interpolymer and SBS.

The Melt Indices of the Present Invention

The preferred melt index (I₂) of the interpolymer is generally at least about 0.5, preferably at least about 0.75 g/10 min. Correspondingly, the preferred melt index (I₂) of the interpolymer is generally less than about 30 g/l 0 min., sometimes preferably less than about 24 g/10 min. However, the preferred melt index may often depend upon the desired conversion process, e.g. blown film, cast film and extrusion lamination, etc.

Blown Film

For blown film processes, the melt index (I₂) of the interpolymer is generally at least about 0.5, preferably at least about 0.75 g/10 min. The melt index (I₂) of the interpolymer is generally at most about 5, preferably at most about 3 g/10 min. In addition, it is often preferable that the ethylene/α-olefin interpolymer be made with a diethyl zinc chain shuttling agent wherein the mole ratio of zinc to ethylene is from about 0.03×10⁻³ to about 1.5×10⁻³.

Cast Film and Extrusion Lamination

For cast film and extrusion laminate processes, the melt index (I₂) of the interpolymer is generally at least about 0.5, preferably at least about 0.75, more preferably at least about 3, even more preferably at least about 4 g/10 min. The melt index (I₂) of the interpolymer is generally at most about 20, preferably at most about 17, more preferably at most about 12, even more preferably at most about 5 g/10 min.

In addition, it is often preferable that the ethylene/α-olefin interpolymer be made with a diethyl zinc chain shuttling agent wherein the ratio of zinc to ethylene is from about 0.03×10⁻³ to about 1.5×10⁻³.

The composition may contain additional components such as other polyolefin based plastomers and/or elastomers. Polyolefin based elastomers and plastomers/polymers include copolymers of ethylene with at least one other alpha olefin (C₃-C₂₂), as well as copolymers of propylene with at least one other alpha olefin (C₂, C₄-C₂₂). In a particularly preferred embodiment, a second component comprising high pressure low density type resin is employed. Possible materials for use as an additional component include LDPE (homopolymer); ethylene copolymerized with one or more α-olefin e.g. propylene or butene; and ethylene copolymerized with at least one α,β-ethylenically unsaturated comonomer, e.g., acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, methyl acrylate and vinyl acetate; branched polypropylene and blends thereof. A suitable technique for preparing useful high pressure ethylene copolymer compositions is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,599,392, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.

In yet another embodiment of this invention, a third polymer component may be used to improve compatibility, miscibility, dispersion, or other characteristics among the polymer components as is generally known in the art.

For additional attributes, any of the polymer components may be functionalized or modified at any stage. Examples include but are not limited to grafting, crosslinking, or other methods of functionalization.

Film layers comprising the composition of the present invention are often capable of stress relaxation of at most about 60, preferably at most about 40, more preferably at most about 28% at 75% strain at 100° F. for at least 10 hours.

Meltblown Fiber

Meltblown fibers are fibers formed by extruding a molten thermoplastic material through a plurality of fine, usually circular, capillaries of a meltblowing die as molten threads or filaments into converging high-velocity, usually hot, gas (e.g., air) streams which are flowing in the same direction as the extruded filaments or threads of the molten thermoplastic material so that the extruded filaments or threads are attenuated, i.e., drawn or extended, to reduce their diameter.

The threads or filaments may be attenuated to microfiber diameter which means the threads or filaments have an average diameter not greater than about 75 microns, generally from about 0.5 microns to about 50 microns, and more particularly from about 2 microns to about 40 microns. Thereafter, the meltblown fibers are carried by the high-velocity gas stream and are deposited on a collecting surface to form a web of randomly disbursed meltblown fibers. The meltblown process is well-known and is described in various patents and publications, including NRL Report 4364, “Manufacture of super-Fine Organic Fibers” by B. A. Wendt, E. L. Boone and D. D Fluharty; NRL Report: 5265, “An Improved Device for the Formation of Super-Fine Thermoplastic Fibers” by K. D Lawrence, R. T. Lukas and J. A. Young; U.S. Pat. No. 3,676,242 to Prentice; and U.S. Pat. No. 3,849,241 to Buntin et al. The foregoing references are incorporated herein in by reference in their entirety. Meltblown fibers are microfibers which may be continuous or discontinuous, are generally smaller than 10 microns in average diameter and are generally tacky when deposited onto a collecting surface.

Preparation of Blends

Blends can be prepared by any suitable means known in the art including tumble dry-blending, weigh-feeding, solvent blending, melt blending via compound or side-arm extrusion, or the like as well as combinations thereof.

The components of the blends of the current invention can be used in a chemically and/or physically modified form to prepare the inventive composition. Such modifications can be accomplished by any known technique such as, for example, by ionomerization and extrusion grafting.

Additives such as antioxidants (e.g., hindered phenolics such as Irganox® 1010 or Irganox® 1076 supplied by Ciba Geigy), phosphites (e.g., Irgafos® 168 also supplied by Ciba Geigy), cling additives (e.g., PIB), Standostab PEPQ™ (supplied by Sandoz), pigments, colorants, fillers, and the like can also be included in the ethylene polymer extrusion composition of the present invention. The article made from or using the inventive composition may also contain additives to enhance antiblocking and coefficient of friction characteristics including, but not limited to, untreated and treated silicon dioxide, talc, calcium carbonate, and clay, as well as primary, secondary and substituted fatty acid amides, chill roll release agents, silicone coatings, etc. Other additives may also be added to enhance the anti-fogging characteristics of, for example, transparent cast films, as described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,486,552, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Still other additives, such as quaternary ammonium compounds alone or in combination with ethylene-acrylic acid (EAA) copolymers or other functional polymers, may also be added to enhance the antistatic characteristics of coatings, profiles and films of this invention and allow, for example, the packaging or making of electronically sensitive goods. Other functional polymers such as maleic anhydride grafted polyethylene may also be added to enhance adhesion, especially to polar substrates.

Alternatively, the polymeric and non-polymeric components may be combined with steps that include solution blending (also known as solvent blending) or a combination of melt and solution methods. Solution blending methods include but are not limited to multiple reactors in series, parallel, or combinations thereof. As solution methods can sometimes result in better dispersion of the components, greater efficacy of the second component is anticipated. Benefits may include using less second component with maintenance of greater elastic properties such as reduced set strain and less hysteresis.

Monolayer or multilayer elastic films and laminates comprising the inventive composition can be prepared by any means including blown film techniques, coextrusion, laminations and the like and combinations thereof, including those techniques described below. When the inventive composition is used in multilayered constructions, substrates or adjacent material layers can be polar or nonpolar including for example, but not limited to, paper products, metals, ceramics, glass and various polymers, particularly other polyolefins, and combinations thereof. If a polymer substrate is used, it may take a variety of forms including but not limited to webs, foams, fabrics, nonwovens, films etc. Particularly preferred laminates often comprise a nonwoven fabric selected from the group consisting of melt blown, spunbond, carded staple fibers, spunlaced staple fibers, and air laid staple fibers. The fabric may comprise two or more compositionally different fibers. For example, the fabric may comprise a multi-component polymeric fiber, wherein at least one of the polymeric components comprises at least a portion of the fiber's surface. These nonwovens and the fibers that comprise them can be bonded in a variety of methods known to those of ordinary skill in the art. These methods include but are not limited to calendaring, ultrasonic welding, chemical binders, adhesives, high energy electron beams, and/or lasers etc.

Fabricated articles comprising the inventive compositions may be selected from the group consisting of adult incontinence articles, feminine hygiene articles, infant care articles, surgical gowns, medical drapes, household cleaning articles, expandable food covers, and personal care articles.

Examples of processes, manufacture, and articles that may benefit from employing the inventive composition and may be suitable for use with the current inventions include, but are not limited to, EP0575509B1, EP0575509B1, EP0707106B1, EP0707106B 1, EP472942B1, EP472942B1, U.S. Pat. No. 3,833,973, U.S. Pat. No. 3,860,003, U.S. Pat. No. 4,116,892, U.S. Pat. No. 4,422,892, U.S. Pat. No. 4,525,407, U.S. Pat. No. 4,573,986, U.S. Pat. No. 4,636,207, U.S. Pat. No. 4,662,875, U.S. Pat. No. 4,695,278, U.S. Pat. No. 4,704,116, U.S. Pat. No. 4,713,069, U.S. Pat. No. 4,720,415, U.S. Pat. No. 4,795,454, U.S. Pat. No. 4,798,603, U.S. Pat. No. 4,808,178, U.S. Pat. No. 4,846,815, U.S. Pat. No. 4,888,231, U.S. Pat. No. 4,900,317, U.S. Pat. No. 4,909,803, U.S. Pat. No. 4,938,753, U.S. Pat. No. 4,938,757, U.S. Pat. No. 4,940,464, U.S. Pat. No. 4,963,140, U.S. Pat. No. 4,965,122, U.S. Pat. No. 4,981,747, U.S. Pat. No. 5,019,065, U.S. Pat. No. 5,032,122, U.S. Pat. No. 5,061,259, U.S. Pat. No. 5,085,654, U.S. Pat. No. 5,114,781, U.S. Pat. No. 5,116,662, U.S. Pat. No. 5,137,537, U.S. Pat. No. 5,147,343, U.S. Pat. No. 5,149,335, U.S. Pat. No. 5,151,092, U.S. Pat. No. 5,156,793, U.S. Pat No. 5,167,897, U.S. Pat. No. 5,169,706, U.S. Pat. No. 5,226,992, U.S. Pat. No. 5,246,433, U.S. Pat. No. 5,286,543, U.S. Pat. No. 5,318,555, U.S. Pat. No. 5,336,545, U.S. Pat. No. 5,360,420, U.S. Pat. No. 5,364,382, U.S. Pat. No. 5,415,644, U.S. Pat. No. 5,429,629, U.S. Pat. No. 5,490,846, U.S. Pat. No. 5,492,751, U.S. Pat. No. 5,496,298, U.S. Pat. No. 5,509,915, U.S. Pat. No. 5,514,470, U.S. Pat. No. 5,518,801, U.S. Pat. No. 5,522,810, U.S. Pat. No. 5,562,646, U.S. Pat. No. 5,562,650, U.S. Pat. No. 5,569,234, U.S. Pat. No. 5,591,155, U.S. Pat. No. 5,599,338, U.S. Pat. No. 5,601,542, U.S. Pat. No. 5,643,588, U.S. Pat. No. 5,650,214, U.S. Pat. No. 5,674,216, U.S. Pat. No. 5,685,874, U.S. Pat. No. 5,691,035, U.S. Pat. No. 5,772,825, U.S. Pat. No. 5,779,831, U.S. Pat. No. 5,836,932, U.S. Pat. No. 5,837,352, U.S. Pat. No. 5,843,056, U.S. Pat. No. 5,843,057, U.S. Pat. No. 5,858,515, U.S. Pat. No. 5,879,341, U.S. Pat. No. 5,882,769, U.S. Pat. No. 5,891,544, U.S. Pat. No. 5,916,663, U.S. Pat. No. 5,931,827, U.S. Pat. No. 5,968,025, U.S. Pat. No. 5,993,433, U.S. Pat. No. 6,027,483, U.S. Pat. No. 6,075,179, U.S. Pat. No. 6,107,537, U.S. Pat. No. 6,118,041, U.S. Pat. No. 6,153,209, U.S. Pat. No. 6,297,424, U.S. Pat. No. 6,307,119, U.S. Pat. No. 6,318,555, U.S. Pat. No. 6,428,526, U.S. Pat. No. 6,491,165, U.S. Pat. No. 6,605,172, U.S. Pat. No. 6,627,786, U.S. Pat. No. 6,635,797, U.S. Pat. No. 6,642,427, U.S. Pat. No. 6,645,190, U.S. Pat. No. 6,689,932, U.S. Pat. No. 6,763,944, U.S. Pat. No. 6,849,067, WO9003258A1, WO9003464A2, U.S. Pat. No. 4,116,892 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,1567,93.

The composition of the present invention may be used in a method of producing a composite elastic material comprising at least one gatherable web bonded to at least one elastic web, such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,720,415, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. Such method comprises (a) tensioning an elastic web (which may comprise a fibrous web such as a nonwoven web of elastomeric fibers, e.g., meltblown elastomeric fibers) to elongate it; (b) bonding the elongated elastic web to at least one gatherable web under conditions which soften at least portions of the elastic web to form a bonded composite web; and (c) relaxing the composite web immediately after the bonding step whereby the gatherable web is gathered to form the composite elastic material. The composition of the present invention may be an elastic web or a gatherable web. Other aspects of the method provide for maintaining the fibrous elastic web in a stretched condition during bonding, at an elongation of at least about 25 percent, preferably about 25 percent to over 500 percent, for example, about 25 percent to 550 percent elongation during the bonding.

The method may also include bonding the elongated elastic web to the gatherable web by overlaying the elastic and gatherable webs and applying heat and pressure to the overlaid webs, for example, by heating bonding sites on the elastic web to a temperature of from at least about 65° C. to about 120° C., preferably from at least about 70° C. to about 90° C.

In accordance with the present invention there is also provided an elastic composite material comprising an elastic web bonded to at least one gatherable web which is extensible and contractible with the elastic web upon stretching and relaxing of the composite material, the elastic composite material being made by a method as described above, wherein the elastic composite material comprises the composition of the present invention.

In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, the elastic web is bonded to the gatherable web at a plurality of spaced-apart locations in a repeating pattern and the gatherable web is gathered between the bonded locations.

Other aspects of the invention provide that the elastic web may comprise a nonwoven web of elastomeric fibers, preferably elastomeric microfibers, such as, for example, an elastomeric nonwoven web of meltblown elastomeric fibers or an elastomeric film.

Other aspects of the invention include one or more of the following in any combination: the elastic web, e.g., a fibrous elastic web, is bonded to the gatherable web at a plurality of spaced-apart locations in a repeating pattern and the gatherable web is gathered between the bonded locations; the elastic web preferably has a low basis weight of from about 5 to about 300, preferably from about 5 to about 200, grams per square meter gm/m²), for example, from about 5 to about 100 grams per square meter, although its basis weight can be much higher; and, the gatherable web is a nonwoven, non-elastic material, preferably one composed of fibers formed from materials selected from the group including polyester fibers, e.g., poly(ethylene terephthalate) fibers, polyolefin fibers, polyamide fibers, e.g., nylon fibers, cellulosic fibers, e.g., cotton fibers, and mixtures thereof. A particular aspect of the present invention is to use elastic and/or lower modulus nonwovens including those comprising propylene copolymers. Such fibers can comprise copolymers of propylene and ethylene. Suitable resins for fabricating such fibers including but are not limited to VERSIFY™ (available from The Dow Chemical Company) and VISTAMAXX™ (available from ExxonMobil Corporation). In another aspect of the present invention, the polyolefin fibers comprise olefin block copolymers such as those generally described in the present application as well as in WO2005/090427 and US 2006-0199930 A1. Not wishing to be bound by theory, it is thought that a nonwoven comprising lower modulus and/or extensible and/or elastic fibers can enable greater compliance and elasticity to the overall structure. In another embodiment, the structure comprises a nonwoven which comprises a mixture of any combination two or more fiber types from the possible group of conventional, lower modulus, extensible, and elastic fibers. Alternatively, the gatherable web may be any suitable woven fabric. The fibers of any of the above embodiments may be made in a number of forms known to those of ordinary skill in the art. These forms include but are not limited to monofilament, bicomponent, multicomponent, side-by-side, coaxial, islands-in-the-sea etc.

The compositions of the present invention may also be used in a method of producing a composite elastic necked-bonded material including one or more layers of necked material joined to one or more layers of elastic sheet, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,226,992 and 5,336,545, which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety. The method comprises applying a tensioning force to at least one neckable material to neck the material; and joining the tensioned, necked material to at least one elastic sheet at least at two locations. The composition of the present invention may be used in a neckable material, an elastic sheet or both. The necked bonded material may comprise a laminate comprising the composition of the present invention. The necked bonded material may also be apertured.

The necked material used as a component of the composite elastic necked-bonded material is formed from a neckable material. If the material is stretchable, it may be necked by stretching in a direction generally perpendicular to the desired direction of neck-down. The neckable material may be any material that can be necked and joined to an elastic sheet. Such neckable materials include knitted and loosely woven fabrics, bonded carded webs, spunbonded webs or meltblown webs. The meltblown web may include meltblown microfibers. The neckable material may also have multiple layers such as, for example, multiple spunbonded layers and/or multiple meltblown layers. The neckable material may be made of polymers such as, for example, polyolefins. Exemplary polyolefins include polypropylene, polyethylene, ethylene copolymers and propylene copolymers. In particular, the polyolefin may comprise olefin block copolymers such as those generally described in the present application as well as in WO2005/090427 and US 2006-0199930 A1.

The composition of the present invention may also be used in a laminate in a stretched bonded material, a machine direction activated material, a cross direction activated material and a machine and cross direction activated material.

The elastic sheet may be a pressure sensitive elastomer adhesive sheet. If the elastic sheet is a nonwoven web of elastic fibers or pressure sensitive elastomer adhesive fibers, the fibers may be meltblown fibers. More particularly, the meltblown fibers may be meltblown microfibers.

The elastic sheet and the reversibly necked material may be joined by overlaying the materials and applying heat and/or pressure to the overlaid materials. Alternatively, the layers may be joined by using other bonding methods and materials such as, for example, adhesives, pressure sensitive adhesives, ultrasonic welding, high energy electron beams, and/or lasers. In one aspect, the elastic sheet may be formed directly on the necked material utilizing processes, such as, for example, meltblowing processes and film extrusion processes.

Other aspects of this invention provide that the pressure sensitive elastomer adhesive sheet and necked material may be joined without the application of heat such as, for example, by a pressure bonder arrangement or by tensioned wind-up techniques.

When an elastic sheet is formed directly on the necked material utilizing film extrusion processes, the method of the present invention may include the following steps: 1) providing a continuously advancing tensioned, necked material; 2) extruding a film of substantially molten elastomer through a die tip; 3) depositing the extruded elastomeric film onto the tensioned, necked material within from about 0.1 to about 1 second of exiting the die tip to form a multilayer material; and 4) immediately applying pressure to the multilayer material to bond the tensioned, necked material to the elastomeric film, as is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,514,470, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.

Generally speaking, the tensioned, necked material may be material that was pre-necked and treated to remain in its necked condition (e.g., a reversibly necked material) or may be provided by applying a tensioning force to at least one neckable material to neck the material.

According to the invention, the film of elastomer may be deposited onto the tensioned, necked material within from about 0.25 seconds to about 0.5 seconds of exiting the die tip. For example, the film of elastomer is deposited onto the tensioned, necked material within from about 0.3 seconds to about 0.45 seconds of exiting the die tip.

According to one aspect of the invention, the film of elastomer may be extruded at a temperature of from about 180° C. to about 285° C. For example, a film of elastomer may be extruded at a temperature of from about 195° C. to about 250° C. Desirably, the film of elastomer may be extruded at a temperature from about 200° C. to about 220° C.

Pressure is applied to bond the necked material to the elastomeric film. This pressure may be applied utilizing, for example, a pressure roll arrangement. The pressure roll arrangement may include at least a first roll and a second roll configured to provide a gap between the rolls. Generally speaking, the gap setting between the first and second rolls of the pressure roll arrangement is large enough so that the force required to extend the resulting composite elastic material on the first pull is at least about 25 percent less than the force required to extend an identical composite elastic material prepared in an identical pressure roll arrangement with the pressure rolls in substantial bonding contact. For example, the method of the present invention may be practiced with the gap setting between the pressure rollers at about 15 mils (about 0.381 mm) to about 125 mils (about 3.175 mm). As a further example, the method of the present invention may be practiced with the gap setting between the pressure rollers at about 30 mils to about 100 mils. Desirably, the method of the present invention is be practiced with the gap setting between the pressure rollers at about 40 mils to about 65 mils.

Alternatively, and/or additionally, pressure applied to bond the necked material to the extruded elastomeric film may be generated by the tensioning force on the tensioned, necked material as the elastomeric film is temporarily configured between a layer of tensioned, necked material and a roller or surface (e.g., a protruding roller or protruding surface).

The elastomeric film may be a film of elastomeric pressure sensitive elastomer adhesive. The elastomeric pressure sensitive elastomer adhesive may be formed from a blend including an elastomeric polymer of the present invention and a tackifying resin.

The present invention also encompasses a composite elastic material produced by the method described above.

According to one aspect of the present invention, the method of producing a composite elastic necked-bonded material including one or more layers of necked material joined to one or more layers of elastic sheet includes the following steps: 1) providing a first and second continuously advancing sheet, each sheet being composed of at least one tensioned, necked material and each sheet advancing in intersecting relationship to form a contact zone; 2) extruding a film of substantially molten elastomer through a die tip between the first and second continuously advancing sheet of tensioned, necked material so that the extruded elastomeric film is deposited into the contact zone within from about 0.1 to about 1 second of exiting the die tip to form a multilayer material; and 3) immediately applying pressure to the multilayer material to bond each tensioned, necked material to the elastomeric film.

Generally speaking, the first and second continuously advancing sheets of tensioned, necked material may be material that was pre-necked and treated to remain in its necked condition (e.g., a reversibly necked material) or may be provided by applying a tensioning force to at least one neckable material to neck the material.

According to the invention, the film of elastomer may be deposited onto the tensioned, necked material within from about 0.25 seconds to about 1 second of exiting the die tip. For example, the film of elastomer may be deposited onto the tensioned, necked material within from about 0.3 seconds to about 0.45 seconds of exiting the die tip.

In an aspect of the invention, the film of elastomer may be extruded at a temperature of from about 180° C. to about 285° C. For example, a film of elastomer may be extruded at a temperature of from about 195° C. to about 250° C. Desirably, the film of elastomer may be extruded at a temperature from about 200° C. to about 220° C.

Other aspects of this invention provide that the pressure sensitive elastomer adhesive sheet and necked material may be joined without the application of heat such as, for example, by a pressure bonder arrangement or by tensioned wind-up techniques.

The present invention also comprises a continuous feed spun bonded laminate comprising the composition of the present invention having improved elastic properties at body temperature such as those disclosed in WO 1999/017926 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,323,389, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. In a preferred embodiment, the laminate comprises a layer of filaments formed by a continuous filament process, to which is bonded a layer of meltblown fibers. This composite material is then sandwiched between two layers of spunbond fibers after being stretched. The resulting layers are then passed between a pair of niprolls and the resulting laminate is then relaxed prior to winding on a 4:1 takeup roll.

The composition of the present invention is preferably used in the filament layer. The styrenic block copolymer is preferably a triblock polystyrene-poly(ethylene/propylene)-polystyrene (“SEPS”) copolymer or a polystyrenepoly(ethylene/butylene)-polystyrene (“SEBS”) copolymer, each having a number average molecular weight of about 81,000 g/mol. The weight percent of styrene is approximately 18% and the weight percent of ethylene/propylene is approximately 82%. Conventional triblock polymer is typically in the 61,000 g/mol range. The molecular weight increase in the polymer midblock, while holding the molecular weight of the styrene block constant, increases the entanglement density, polymer chain persistence length and the relaxation time. The laminate is particularly useful as side panel material in training pants because of the resistance to sagging at body temperature.

In addition, the present invention relates to non-tacky, microtextured, multi-layer elastomeric laminates such as described in EP500590 B 1, and U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,501,679 and 5,691,034, which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety. The laminates of the present invention are comprised both of an elastomeric polymeric core layer(s), which provides elastomeric properties to the laminate and one or more polymeric skin layers which are capable of becoming microtextured. This microtexturing increases the comfort level of the elastomeric material which is complemented by a significant lowering of the laminate's coefficient of friction and modulus. In preferred embodiments of the present invention the skin layer further can function to permit controlled release or recovery of the stretched elastomer, modify the modulus of elasticity of the elastomeric laminate and/or stabilize the shape of the elastomeric laminate (i.e., by controlling further necking). The laminates can be prepared by coextrusion of the selected polymers or by application of one or more elastomer layers onto one or more already formed skin layer(s). Coextrusion is preferred. The novel non-tacky microtextured laminate is obtained by stretching the laminate past the elastic limit of the outer skin layers. The laminate then recovers, which can be instantaneous, over an extended time period, which is skin layer controllable, or by the application of heat, which is also skin layer controllable.

Stretching of the laminate can be uniaxial, sequentially biaxial, or simultaneously biaxial. The method and degree of stretch allow significant control over the resulting microtextured surface.

The elastomer comprises compositions of the present invention. Further, preferably, the elastomer of the invention will sustain only small permanent set following deformation and relaxation which set is preferably 20 to 200 percent and more preferably 20 to 100 percent of the original length at 500%. The elastomer of the present invention should be stretched to a degree that causes relatively consistent permanent deformation in a relatively inelastic skin layer. This can be as low as 50% elongation. Preferably, the elastomer is capable of undergoing up to 300 to 1200% elongation at room temperature, and most preferably up to 600 to 800% elongation at room temperature.

In a particular aspect, the composition of the present invention comprises a layer in a multilayer structure in which at least one skin layer is used. In a particular aspect, the skin layer can be formed of any semi-crystalline or amorphous polymer that is less elastic (e.g. higher permanent set) than the core layer(s) and will undergo permanent deformation at the stretch percentage that the elastomeric laminate will undergo. Therefore, slightly elastic compounds, such as some olefinic elastomers, e.g. ethylene-propylene elastomers, other olefin block copolymers, or ethylene-propylene-diene terpolymer elastomers or ethylenic copolymers, e.g., ethylene vinyl acetate, can be used as skin layers, either alone or in blends. However, the skin layer is generally a polyolefin such as polyethylene, polypropylene, polybutylene or a polyethylene-polypropylene copolymer, but may also be wholly or partly polyamide such as nylon, polyester such as polyethylene terephthalate, polyvinylidene fluoride, polyacrylate such as poly(methyl methacrylate)(only in blends) and the like, and blends thereof. In one particular aspect, the skin layer comprises α-olefins. In another aspect, the skin layer comprises olefin block copolymers such as those generally described in the present application as well as in WO2005/090427 and US 2006-0199930 A1. The skin layer material can be influenced by the type of elastomer selected. If the elastomeric layer is in direct contact with the skin layer the skin layer should have sufficient adhesion to the elastomeric core layer such that it will not readily delaminate. Skin-to-core contact has been found to follow three modes: first, full contact between the core and microtextured skin; second, cohesive failure of the core under the microtexture folds; and third, adhesive failure of the skin to the core under the microtexture folds with intermittent skin/core contact at the fold valleys. However, where a high modulus elastomeric layer is used with a softer polymer skin layer attachment may be acceptable yet a microtextured surface may not form.

The skin layer is used in conjunction with an elastomeric layer and can either be an outer layer or an inner layer (e.g., sandwiched between two elastomeric layers). Used as either an outer or inner layer the skin layer will modify the elastic properties of the elastomeric laminate.

Additives useful in the skin layer include, but are not limited to, mineral oil extenders, antistatic agents, pigments, dyes, antiblocking agents, provided in amounts less than about 15%, starch and metal salts for degradability and stabilizers such as those described for the elastomeric core layer.

Other layers may be added between the core layer and the outer layers, such as tie layers to improve the bonding of the layers. Tie layers can be formed of, or compounded with, typical compounds for this use including ethylene copolymers, propylene copolymers, propylene-ethylene copolymers, olefin block copolymers, maleic anhydride modified elastomers, ethyl vinyl acetates and olefins, polyacrylic imides, butyl acrylates, peroxides such as peroxypolymers, e.g., peroxyolefins, silanes, e.g., epoxysilanes, reactive polystyrenes, chlorinated polyethylene, acrylic acid modified polyolefins and ethyl vinyl acetates with acetate and anhydride functional groups and the like, which can also be used in blends or as compatiblizers in one or more of the skin or core layers. Tie layers are particularly useful when the bonding force between the skin and core is low. This is often the case with polyethylene skin as its low surface tension resists adhesion. However, any added layers must not significantly affect the microstructuring of the skin layers.

In particular, the tie layer may comprise olefin block copolymers such as those generally described in the present application as well as in WO2005/090427 and US 2006-0199930 A1.

One unique feature of this aspect of the invention is the ability to control the shrink recovery mechanism of the laminate depending on the conditions of film formation, the nature of the elastomeric layer, the nature of the skin layer, the manner in which the laminate film is stretched and the relative thicknesses of the elastomeric and skin layer(s). By controlling these variables, the laminate film can be designed to instantaneously recover, recover over time or recover upon heat activation.

The present invention is also directed to laminates such as those described above wherein the one or more polymeric skin layers are capable of becoming microtextured at specified areas along the laminate length, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,344,691, which is herein incorporated by reference. The microtextured areas will correspond to sections of the laminate that have been activated from an inelastic, to an elastomeric form. In preferred embodiments of the present invention, the skin layer can further function to permit controlled recovery of the stretched elastomer, modify the modulus behavior of the elastomeric laminate and/or stabilize the shape of the elastomeric laminate (e.g., by controlling necking). The novel, non-tacky microtextured laminate is obtained by stretching the laminate past the elastic limit of predetermined regions of the skin layers. This is termed selective or preferential activation. The laminate then recovers in these predetermined regions, which can be instantaneous, over an extended time period, which is skin layer controllable, or by the application of heat, which is also skin layer controllable.

This selective or preferential activation is produced by controlling the relative elastic modulus values of selected cross-sectional areas of the laminate to be less than modulus values of adjacent cross-sectional areas. The areas controlled to have reduced modulus will preferentially yield when subjected to stress. This will result in either preferential elastization of specified zones or fully elasticized laminates with higher strain regions, depending on the location of the areas of low modulus and the manner of stretch. Alternatively, the laminate could be treated to enhance or concentrate stress in selected regions. This will yield essentially the same results as providing low modulus regions. By either construction, the laminate can activate in selected regions at lower stretch ratios than would normally be required to activate the entire laminate.

The modulus can be controlled by providing one or more layers of the laminate with relatively low and high modulus areas. This can be accomplished by selectively altering the physical or chemical characteristics of regions of one or more layers or by providing a layer(s) with regions of diverse chemical composition. Regionally enhanced stress can be induced by physical or chemical treatment of a layer(s) such as by ablation, scoring, corona treatment or the like.

Viscosity reducing polymers and plasticizers can also be blended with the elastomers such as low molecular weight polyethylene and polypropylene polymers and copolymers, or tackifying resins such as Wingtack™, aliphatic hydrocarbon tackifiers available from Goodyear Chemical Company. Tackifiers can also be used to increase the adhesiveness of an elastomeric layer to a skin layer. Examples of tackifiers include aliphatic or aromatic hydrocarbon liquid tackifiers, polyterpene resin tackifiers, and hydrogenated tackifying resins. Aliphatic hydrocarbon resins are preferred.

Additives such as dyes, pigments, antioxidants, antistatic agents, bonding aids, antiblocking agents, slip agents, heat stabilizers, photostabilizers, foaming agents, glass bubbles, starch and metal salts for degradability or microfibers can also be used in the elastomeric core layer(s). Suitable antistatic aids include ethoxylated amines or quaternary amines such as those described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,386,125, which also describes suitable antiblocking agents, slip agents and lubricants. Softening agents, tackifiers or lubricants are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,813,947 and include coumarone-indene resins, terpene resins, hydrocarbon resins and the like. These agents can also function as viscosity reducing aids. Conventional heat stabilizers include organic phosphates, trihydroxy butyrophenone or zinc salts of alkyl dithiocarbonate. Suitable antioxidants include hindered phenolic compounds and amines possibly with thiodipropionic acid or aromatic phosphates or tertiary butyl cresol. See also U.S. Pat. No. 4,476,180 for suitable additives and percentages.

The composition of the present invention may also be used in non-tacky, microtextured, multi-layer elastomeric laminated tape backings and the tapes made therefrom, such as those described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,354,597, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. The laminate tape backings of the present invention are comprised both of an elastomeric polymeric core layer(s), which provides elastomeric properties to the laminate and one or more polymeric skin layers which are capable of becoming microtextured. This microtexturing gives the tape natural low adhesion backsize properties, increases ink receptivity, acts as an adhesive primer, and lowers the laminate coefficient of friction and modulus. In preferred embodiments of the present invention the skin layer further can function to permit controlled release or recovery of the stretched elastomer, modify the modulus of elasticity of the elastomeric tape and/or stabilize the shape of the elastomeric tape. The laminate tape backings may be prepared by coextrusion of the selected polymers or by application of one or more elastomer layers onto one or more already formed skin layer(s) or vice versa. Coextrusion is preferred. Pressure-sensitive adhesive (hereinafter adhesive) may be applied by any conventional mechanism including coextrusion. The novel microtextured laminate tape and/or tape backing is obtained by stretching the laminate past the elastic limit of the skin layers. The laminate then recovers, which can be instantaneous, over an extended time period, which is skin layer controllable, or by the application of heat, which is also skin layer controllable. Stretching of the laminate tape or backing can be uniaxial, sequentially biaxial, or simultaneously biaxial.

A laminate capable of instantaneous shrink is one in which the stretched elastomeric laminate will recover more than 15% in 1 sec. A laminate capable of time shrink is one where the 15% recovery point takes place more than 1 sec., preferably more than 5 sec., most preferably more than 20 sec. after stretch, and a laminate capable of heat shrink is where less than 15% shrink recovery occurs to the laminate in the first 20 seconds after stretch. Percent recovery is the percent that the amount of shrinkage is of the stretched length minus the original length. For heat shrink, there will be an activation temperature which will initiate significant heat activated recovery. The activation temperature used for heat shrink will generally be the temperature that will yield 50% of the total possible recovery (T_(a-50)) and preferably this temperature is defined as the temperature which will yield 90% (T_(a-90)) of the total possible recovery. Total possible recovery includes the amount of preactivation shrinkage.

Generally, where the skin layer of the laminate tape backing is relatively thin, the laminate will tend to contract or recover immediately. When the skin thickness is increased sufficiently the laminate can become heat shrinkable. This phenomenon can occur even when the elastomeric layer is formed from a non-heat shrinkable material. Further, by careful selection of the thicknesses of the elastomeric layer and the skin layer(s), the temperature at which the laminate recovers by a set amount can be controlled within a set range. This is termed skin controlled recovery where generally by altering the thickness or composition of the skin, one can raise the activation temperature of an elastomeric core by a significant degree, generally more than at least 10° F. (5.6° C.) and preferably by 15° F. (8.3° C.) and more. Although any skin thickness which is effective can be employed, too thick a skin will cause the laminate to remain permanently set when stretched. Generally, where a single skin is less than 30% of the laminate this will not occur. For most heat or time shrink materials the stretched elastomer must be cooled so that the energy released during stretching does not cause immediate heat activated recovery. Fine tuning of the shrink recovery mechanism can be accomplished by the amount of stretch. This overall control over the shrink recovery mechanism can be an extremely important advantage, for example, when the unactivated tape is used in a manufacturing process. This control permits adjustment of the recovery mechanism of the elastomeric laminate tape to fit the requirements of a manufacturing process rather than the need to adjust a manufacturing process to fit the shrink recovery mechanism of the elastomer itself.

Skin controlled recovery may also be used to control the slow or time shrink recovery mechanism, as with the heat shrink mechanism. This shrink recovery mechanism occurs as an intermediate between instant and heat shrink recovery. Skin layer and stretch ratio control of recovery is possible as in the heat shrink mechanism, with the added ability to change the shrink mechanism in either direction, i.e., to a heat or an instant shrink elastomeric laminate tape.

A time shrink recovery laminate tape will also exhibit some heat shrink characteristics and vice versa. For example, a time shrink laminate tape can be prematurely recovered by exposure to heat, e.g., at a time prior to 20 seconds after stretch.

Recovery can also be initiated for most time shrink and some low activation temperature heat shrink recovery laminates by mechanical deformation or activation. In this case, the laminate tape is scored, folded, wrinkled, or the like to cause localized stress fractures that cause localized premature folding of the skin, accelerating formation of the recovered microtextured laminate. Mechanical activation can be performed by any suitable method such as by using a textured roll, a scoring wheel, mechanical deformation or the like.

The laminate tape backings of the present invention may be formed by any convenient layer forming process such as pressing layers together, coextruding the layers or stepwise extrusion of layers, but coextrusion is a preferred process. Coextrusion per se is known and is described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,557,265 and 3,479,425. Tubular coextrusion or double bubble extrusion is also possible. The layers are typically coextruded through a specialized die and/or feedblock that will bring the diverse materials into contact while forming the laminate.

Whether the laminate backing is prepared by coating, lamination, sequential extrusion, coextrusion or a combination thereof, the laminate formed and its layers will preferably have substantially uniform thicknesses across the laminate backing. Preferably the layers are coextensive across the width and length of the laminate. With such a construction the microtexturing is substantially uniform over the elastomeric laminate surface. Laminates prepared in this manner have generally uniform elastomeric properties with a minimum of edge effects such as curl, modulus change, fraying and the like. Further, when wound as in a roll of tape, this will minimize formation of hard bands, winding problems, roll telescoping or the like.

The laminate backing of the invention has an unlimited range of potential widths, the width limited solely by the fabricating machinery width limitations. This allows fabrication of microtextured elastomeric tapes for a wide variety of potential uses.

After formation, the laminate tape backing can be stretched past the elastic limit of the skin, which deforms. The laminate tape backing then is recovered instantaneously, with time or by the application of heat, as discussed above. For heat recovery, the temperature of activation is determined by the materials used to form the laminate in the first instance. For any particular laminate, the activation temperature, either T_(a-50) or T_(a-90), can be adjusted by varying the skin/core ratio of the laminate, adjusting the percent stretch or the overall laminate thickness. The activation temperature used for a heat shrink laminate is generally at least 80° F. (26.7° C.), preferably at least 90° F. (32.2° C.) most preferably over 100° F. (37.8° C.). When heat-activated, the stretched laminates are quenched on a cooling roller, which prevents the heat generated from the elongation from activating laminate recovery. The chill roll is below the activation temperature.

The composition of the present invention may also be used in improved non-tacky, microtextured, multi-layer elastomeric laminates, such as those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,422,178 and 5,376,430, both of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety. The laminates of the present invention are comprised of an elastomeric polymeric core layer(s), which provides elastomeric properties to the laminate and one or more polymeric skin layers. Laminates can be prepared by coextrusion of the selected polymers for the skin and core layers or by application of one or more elastomer layer(s) onto one or more already formed skin layer(s). The novel, non-tacky microtextured laminate is obtained by stretching the laminate past the elastic limit of the skin layers and, while the laminate is stretched, selectively deactivating the elasticity of the laminate at predetermined regions. The laminate then recovers, in the non-deactivated regions, which can be instantaneous, over an extended time period, which is skin layer controllable, or by the application of heat, which is also skin layer controllable.

The selectively deactivated areas provide high-strength inelastic regions. The recovered regions can be microtextured or have detached skin layers.

These laminates may also be used in pressure-sensitive adhesive backed tapes.

In addition, the laminates may be used such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,462,708, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. In particular, the shrink recovery mechanism of the laminate, after stretching and selective deactivation, depends on the conditions of film formation, the nature of the elastomeric layer(s), the nature of the skin layer(s), the manner in which the laminate film is stretched and the relative thicknesses of the elastomeric and skin layer(s). By controlling these variables, the laminate film can be designed to instantaneously recover, recover over time or recover upon heat activation. Generally, the core-to-single skin layer ratio will be at least 3, preferably, at least 5 and less than about 100 and most preferably at least 5 to about 75. The overall laminate thickness will be at least 1 mil, preferably at least 2 mils, although preferably less than 10 mils for cost and performance considerations. At core-to-skin layer ratios less than 3, the laminate has a tendency to not recover when stretched. A stretched and selectively deactivated laminate capable of instantaneous shrink is one in which the stretched, non-deactivated areas of the elastomeric laminate will recover more than 15% in 1 sec. A laminate capable of time shrink is one where the 15% recovery point takes place more than 1 sec., preferably more than 5 sec., most preferably more than 20 sec. after stretch, and a laminate capable of heat shrink is where less than 15% shrink recovery occurs to the laminate in the first 20 seconds after stretch and will remain capable of heat shrink for weeks after it is stretched. Percent recovery is the percent that the amount of shrinkage is of the stretched length minus the original length of the activated area. For heat-shrink laminates there will be an activation temperature which will initiate significant heat-activated recovery. The activation temperature used for a heat-shrink laminate will generally be the temperature that will yield 50% of the total possible recovery (T_(a-50)) and preferably this temperature is defined as the temperature which will yield 90% (T_(a-90)) of the total possible recovery. Total possible recovery includes the amount of preactivation shrinkage.

Also, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,468,428, which is herein incorporated by reference, the selective or preferential activation is produced by controlling the relative elastic modulus values of selected cross-sectional areas of the laminate to be less than modulus values of adjacent cross-sectional areas. The areas controlled to have reduced modulus will preferentially yield when subjected to stress. This will result in either preferential elastization of specified zones or fully elasticized laminates with higher strain regions, depending on the location of the areas of low modulus and the manner of stretch. Alternatively, the laminate could be treated to enhance or concentrate stress in selected regions. This will yield essentially the same results as providing low modulus regions. By either construction, the laminate can activate in selected regions at lower stretch ratios than would normally be required activate the entire laminate.

The modulus can be controlled by providing one or more layers of the laminate with relatively low and high modulus areas. This can be accomplished by selectively altering the physical or chemical characteristics of regions of one or more layers or by providing a layer(s) with regions of diverse chemical composition. Regionally enhanced stress can be induced by physical or chemical treatment of a layer(s) such as by ablation, scoring, corona treatment or the like.

The composition of the present invention may also be used in improved non-tacky, nonelastomeric materials capable of becoming elastomeric when stretched, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,429,856. Such materials comprise at least one elastomeric core and a surrounding nonelastomeric matrix, preferably prepared by coextrusion. The material of the present invention may be used in the elastomeric polymeric core region, which provides the elastomeric properties to the material and a polymeric matrix, which is capable of becoming microtextured at specified areas. The microtextured areas will correspond to sections of the material that have been activated from an inelastic to an elastomeric form. In preferred embodiments of the present invention, the matrix material further can function to permit controlled recovery of the stretched elastomer, modify the modulus of elasticity of the elastomeric material and/or stabilize the shape of the elastomeric material (e.g., by controlling further necking). The material is preferably prepared by coextrusion of the selected matrix and elastomeric polymers. The novel, non-tacky microtextured form of the material is obtained by stretching the material past the elastic limit of the matrix polymer in predetermined elastic containing regions. The laminate then recovers in these predetermined regions, which can be instantaneous, over an extended time period, which is matrix material controllable, or by the application of heat, which is also matrix material controllable.

In certain constructions, complex periodic macrostructures can form between selectively elasticized regions depending on the method and direction of stretch activation. This can result in elastics with a considerable degree of bulk formed with relatively small amounts of elastic. This is desirable for many applications, particularly in garments.

Another use for the compositions of the present invention is in film laminates as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,620,780, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. In particular, the composition may be used in a film laminate as an elasticized diaper fastening tab as per, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 3,800,796. The one or more elastomeric core(s) could be placed at the desired location while providing nonelastic end portions. The elasticized film is preferably 10 mm to 50 mm wide for most conventional tape tab constructions. This provides adequate tension without having to stretch the tape too far onto the diaper front. This tab could be cut from film stock containing one or more elastomeric bands. Adhesive or a mechanical fastener (e.g., hook or loop) element could then be applied to one or more faces of the nonelastic end portions. However, the pressure-sensitive adhesive coated (or mechanical fastener containing) end portion for releasable attaching to the diaper front portion could be 8 to 15 mm wide while the end portion permanently attached to the diaper side is widened substantially, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,399,219.

The present invention may also be used in an extensible elastic tab designed to be adhered to the edge of an article, formed using a coextruded elastic film comprising at least one elastic layer and at least one second layer on at least a first face of the elastic layer, such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,159,584, which is herein incorporated by reference. One face of the coextruded elastic film is attached to at least a partially extensible nonwoven layer: The partially expandable, or extensible nonwoven layer has at least one first portion with limited extensibility in a first direction and at least one second inextensible portion in the first direction. The extensible elastic tab when stretched to the extension limit of the first portion or portions in the first direction will elastically recover at least 1.0 cm, preferably at least 2 cm providing an elastic tab having a Useful Stretch Ratio (as defined in the Examples of U.S. Pat. No. 6,159,584) of at least 30 percent. The Useful Stretch Ratio includes the portion of the elastic recovery length having an elastic recovery force of greater than 20 grams/cm force, but below a given extension which generally is 90 percent of the extension limit. Further, the elastic tab in the region of the Useful Stretch Ratio preferably has an incremental extension force of less than about 300 grams/cm. The coextruded elastic film second layer is preferably a relatively inelastic material or blend and provided on both faces of the at least one elastic layer.

The present invention may also be used in pressure sensitive adhesive backed tape, such as that described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,800,903, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.

The composition of the present invention may also be used in a thin multi-layer elastic film that stretches in the transverse direction, such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,472,084, which is herein incorporated by reference. The elastic film has a first layer, a second layer and a core layer. The film has activated zones and non-activated zones. The activated zones have sufficient elasticity to stretch to at least 200% while maintaining a permanent set percent of no more than 5%. The non-activated zones have sufficient non-elasticity to stretch at least 200% while maintaining a permanent set percent of up to 5%. The activated zones have a tear strength as measured by the Elmendorf Tear Test of 30 g while the non-activated zones have a tear strength as measured by the Elmendorf Tear Test of at least 50 g. The elastic film is particularly useful in products such as elastic waistbands, side panels and the like for use in products such as absorbent, disposable products. The superior tear-strength of the film prevents tearing during use of the film and promotes longer-lasting applications of the film. In addition, the superior tear-strength of the film prevents existing tears from propagating throughout the film.

The high performance elastic behavior is defined by tensile set less than about 50 percent and force relaxation less than about 20 percent after 300 percent elongation. The procedure to measure hysteresis of a sample is as follows:

1. A sample of the film or laminate (6 inches long and 1 inch wide strip) is prepared with the length in the intended direction of use. The sample is placed lengthwise in the jaws (separated by 4 inches) of a tensile testing machine.

2. The sample is pulled a first time (cycle 1 elongation) at the rate of 20 inches per minute to the desired elongation (for example, 200 percent)

3. The force upon reaching the desired elongation is noted.

4. The sample is held at the desired elongation for 30 seconds after which the force is noted.

5. The instrument is returned to its initial position (zero elongation)

6. The sample is held in a relaxed state for 30 seconds.

7. The sample is pulled a second time (cycle 2 elongation) at the rate of 20 inches per minute to the desired elongation. The amount of movement in the tensile testing machine jaw before the film exerts any force is noted.

8. The sample is held at the desired elongation for 30 seconds and then relaxed.

Tensile set is a measure of the permanent deformation of the sample as a result of the initial elongation, hold, and relax cycle. Specifically, tensile set is the elongation measured in the second cycle divided by the initial sample length (2 inches).

When the inventive blend is used in multilayer structures such as those described within U.S. Pat. No. 6,472,084 B1 the overall structure is measured using the Elmendorf Tear Test in accordance with ASTM D 1922, entitled Standard Test Method for Propagation Tear Resistance of Plastic Film and Thin Sheeting by Pendulum Method.

The following examples are presented to exemplify embodiments of the invention. All numerical values are approximate. When numerical ranges are given, it should be understood that embodiments outside the stated ranges may still fall within the scope of the invention. Specific details described in each example should not be construed as necessary features of the invention.

EXAMPLES

Testing Methods

In the examples that follow, the following analytical techniques are employed:

GPC Method for Samples 1-4 and A-C

An automated liquid-handling robot equipped with a heated needle set to 160° C. is used to add enough 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene stabilized with 300 ppm Ionol to each dried polymer sample to give a final concentration of 30 mg/mL. A small glass stir rod is placed into each tube and the samples are heated to 160° C. for 2 hours on a heated, orbital-shaker rotating at 250 rpm. The concentrated polymer solution is then diluted to 1 mg/ml using the automated liquid-handling robot and the heated needle set to 160° C.

A Symyx Rapid GPC system is used to determine the molecular weight data for each sample. A Gilson 350 pump set at 2.0 ml/min flow rate is used to pump helium-purged 1,2-dichlorobenzene stabilized with 300 ppm Ionol as the mobile phase through three Plgel 10 micrometer (μm) Mixed B 300 mm×7.5 mm columns placed in series and heated to 160° C. A Polymer Labs ELS 1000 Detector is used with the Evaporator set to 250° C., the Nebulizer set to 165° C., and the nitrogen flow rate set to 1.8 SLM at a pressure of 60-80 psi (400-600 kPa) N₂. The polymer samples are heated to 160° C. and each sample injected into a 250 μl loop using the liquid-handling robot and a heated needle. Serial analysis of the polymer samples using two switched loops and overlapping injections are used. The sample data is collected and analyzed using Symyx Epoch™ software. Peaks are manually integrated and the molecular weight information reported uncorrected against a polystyrene standard calibration curve.

Standard CRYSTAF Method

Branching distributions are determined by crystallization analysis fractionation (CRYSTAF) using a CRYSTAF 200 unit commercially available from PolymerChar, Valencia, Spain. The samples are dissolved in 1,2,4 trichlorobenzene at 160° C. (0.66 mg/mL) for 1 hr and stabilized at 95° C. for 45 minutes. The sampling temperatures range from 95 to 30° C. at a cooling rate of 0.2° C./min. An infrared detector is used to measure the polymer solution concentrations. The cumulative soluble concentration is measured as the polymer crystallizes while the temperature is decreased. The analytical derivative of the cumulative profile reflects the short chain branching distribution of the polymer.

The CRYSTAF peak temperature and area are identified by the peak analysis module included in the CRYSTAF Software (Version 2001.b, PolymerChar, Valencia, Spain). The CRYSTAF peak finding routine identifies a peak temperature as a maximum in the dW/dT curve and the area between the largest positive inflections on either side of the identified peak in the derivative curve. To calculate the CRYSTAF curve, the preferred processing parameters are with a temperature limit of 70° C. and with smoothing parameters above the temperature limit of 0.1, and below the temperature limit of 0.3.

DSC Standard Method (Excluding Samples 1-4 and A-C)

Differential Scanning Calorimetry results are determined using a TAI model Q1000 DSC equipped with an RCS cooling accessory and an autosampler. A nitrogen purge gas flow of 50 ml/min is used. The sample is pressed into a thin film and melted in the press at about 175° C. and then air-cooled to room temperature (25° C.). 3-10 mg of material is then cut into a 6 mm diameter disk, accurately weighed, placed in a light aluminum pan (ca 50 mg), and then crimped shut. The thermal behavior of the sample is investigated with the following temperature profile. The sample is rapidly heated to 180° C. and held isothermal for 3 minutes in order to remove any previous thermal history. The sample is then cooled to −40° C. at 10° C./min cooling rate and held at −40° C. for 3 minutes. The sample is then heated to 150° C. at 10° C./min. heating rate. The cooling and second heating curves are recorded.

The DSC melting peak is measured as the maximum in heat flow rate (W/g) with respect to the linear baseline drawn between −30° C. and end of melting. The heat of fusion is measured as the area under the melting curve between −30° C. and the end of melting using a linear baseline.

GPC Method (Excluding Samples 14 and A-C)

The gel permeation chromatographic system consists of either a Polymer Laboratories Model PL-210 or a Polymer Laboratories Model PL-220 instrument. The column and carousel compartments are operated at 140° C. Three Polymer Laboratories 10-micron Mixed-B columns are used. The solvent is 1,2,4 trichlorobenzene. The samples are prepared at a concentration of 0.1 grams of polymer in 50 milliliters of solvent containing 200 ppm of butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT). Samples are prepared by agitating lightly for 2 hours at 160° C. The injection volume used is 100 microliters and the flow rate is 1.0 ml/minute.

Calibration of the GPC column set is performed with 21 narrow molecular weight distribution polystyrene standards with molecular weights ranging from 580 to 8,400,000, arranged in 6 “cocktail” mixtures with at least a decade of separation between individual molecular weights. The standards are purchased from Polymer Laboratories (Shropshire, UK). The polystyrene standards are prepared at 0.025 grams in 50 milliliters of solvent for molecular weights equal to or greater than 1,000,000, and 0.05 grams in 50 milliliters of solvent for molecular weights less than 1,000,000. The polystyrene standards are dissolved at 80° C. with gentle agitation for 30 minutes. The narrow standards mixtures are run first and in order of decreasing highest molecular weight component to minimize degradation. The polystyrene standard peak molecular weights are converted to polyethylene molecular weights using the following equation (as described in Williams and Ward, J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Let., 6, 621 (1968)): M_(polyethylene)=0.431(M_(polystyrene)).

Polyethylene equivalent molecular weight calculations are performed using Viscotek TriSEC software Version 3.0.

Compression Set

Compression set is measured according to ASTM D 395. The sample is prepared by stacking 25.4 mm diameter round discs of 3.2 mm, 2.0 mm, and 0.25 mm thickness until a total thickness of 12.7 mm is reached. The discs are cut from 12.7 cm×12.7 cm compression molded plaques molded with a hot press under the following conditions: zero pressure for 3 min at 190° C., followed by 86 MPa for 2 min at 190° C., followed by cooling inside the press with cold running water at 86 MPa.

Density

Samples for density measurement are prepared according to ASTM D 1928. Measurements are made within one hour of sample pressing using ASTM D792, Method B.

Flexural/Secant Modulus/Storage Modulus

Samples are compression molded using ASTM D 1928. Flexural and 2 percent secant moduli are measured according to ASTM D-790. Storage modulus is measured according to ASTM D 5026-01 or equivalent technique.

Optical Properties

Films of 0.4 mm thickness are compression molded using a hot press (Carver Model #4095-4PR1001R). The pellets are placed between polytetrafluoroethylene sheets, heated at 190° C. at 55 psi (380 kPa) for 3 min, followed by 1.3 MPa for 3 min, and then 2.6 MPa for 3 min. The film is then cooled in the press with running cold water at 1.3 MPa for 1 min. The compression molded films are used for optical measurements, tensile behavior, recovery, and stress relaxation.

Clarity is measured using BYK Gardner Haze-gard as specified in ASTM D 1746.

45° gloss is measured using BYK Gardner Glossmeter Microgloss 45° as specified in ASTM D-2457

Internal haze is measured using BYK Gardner Haze-gard based on ASTM D 1003 Procedure A. Mineral oil is applied to the film surface to remove surface scratches.

Mechanical Properties—Tensile, Hysteresis, and Tear

Stress-strain behavior in uniaxial tension is measured using ASTM D 1708 microtensile specimens. Samples are stretched with an Instron at 500% min⁻¹ at 21° C. Tensile strength and elongation at break are reported from an average of 5 specimens.

300% Hysteresis and Tensile Tests at Ambient Conditions

Inventive and comparative examples (Tables 19, 20, 21, 22) were formulated by weighing out the components. They were then introduced to the Haake mixer preheated to 190° C. and set at 40 rpm rotor speed. After torque reached steady state (typically three to five minutes), the sample was then removed and allowed to cool. The blends were then molded in following method.

Compression molded plaques are prepared by weighing out the necessary amount of material to fill a 9 inch long by 6 inch wide by 0.5 millimeter thick mold. The material and the mold are lined with Mylar film and placed between chrome coated metal sheets and then the ensemble is placed into a PHI laminating press model PW-L425 (City of Industry, Calif.) preheated to 190° C. The material is allowed to melt for 5 minutes under minimal pressure. Then a force of 10000 pounds is applied for 5 minutes. Next, the force is increased to 20000 pounds and 1 minute is allowed to elapse. Afterwards, the ensemble is placed between 25° C. water-cooled platens and cooled for 5 minutes. The molded plaque is then removed from the mold and is aged at ambient conditions (about 20° C., 50% relative humidity) for at least 24 hours before testing.

The 300% hysteresis test at ambient conditions is performed at about 20° C. with 50% relative humidity using an Instron™ 5564 (Canton, Mass.) equipped with pneumatic grips and fitted with a 2 kN pound tension load cell. Compression molded plaques are prepared according to the compression molding aforementioned procedure. Microtensile specimens (ASTM D1708) are extracted of the compression molded plaques using a NAEF (Bolton Landing, N.Y.) B-36 punch. After proper calibration of the load cell, the microtensile (ASTM 1708) specimen is oriented parallel to the displacement direction of the crosshead and then is gripped using a grip separation of 22.25 mm. This separation of 22.25 mm is also taken as the gauge length of the sample. The sample is then stretched to 300% strain at a rate of 500% min⁻¹ (111.25 mm/min). The crosshead direction is then immediately reversed at then returned to the starting grip separation also at 500% min⁻¹ (111.25 mm/min). The crosshead direction is then again reversed such that the sample is then extended at 500% min⁻¹ (111.25 mm/min). During this loading step, the strain corresponding to a tensile stress of 0.05 MPa (megapascals) is taken as the permanent set.

The tensile test at ambient conditions is performed at about 20° C. with 50% relative humidity. Specimens are prepared according to the compression molding procedure described above. An Instron™ 5564 (Canton, Mass.) equipped with pneumatic grips and fitted with a 2 kN pound tension load cell is used. Microtensile specimens (ASTM D1708) are extracted of the compression molded plaques using a NAEF (Bolton Landing, N.Y.) B-36 punch. After proper calibration of the load cell, the microtensile (ASTM 1708) specimen is oriented parallel to the displacement direction of the crosshead and then is gripped using a grip separation of 22.25 mm. This separation of 22.25 mm is also taken as the gauge length of the sample. The sample is then stretched at a rate of 500% min⁻¹ (111.25 mm/min) until the specimen breaks. The peak tensile stress is taken as the tensile strength of the material. The corresponding strain is taken as the elongation at break.

Strain is measured as a percentage and is defined as the crosshead displacement divided by the original grip separation of 22.25 mm and then multiplied by 100. Stress is defined as force divided by the cross sectional area of the narrow portion of the gauge portion of the ASTM D 1708 microtensile specimen prior to deformation.

Uncertainty for tensile strength measurements is estimated to be about less than 20% of the measured values.

Uncertainty for elongation to break measurements is estimated to be about less than 20% of the measured values.

Uncertainty for 2% secant modulus is estimated to be about less than 30% of the measured values.

Uncertainty for permanent set measurements is estimated to be about +5% strain.

TMA

Thermal Mechanical Analysis (Penetration Temperature) is conducted on 30 mm diameter×3.3 mm thick, compression molded discs, formed at 180° C. and 10 MPa molding pressure for 5 minutes and then air quenched. The instrument used is a Perkin-Elmer TMA 7. In the test, a probe with 1.5 mm radius tip (P/N N519-0416) is applied to the surface of the sample disc with 1N force. The temperature is raised at 5° C./min from 25° C. The probe penetration distance is measured as a function of temperature. The experiment ends when the probe has penetrated 1 mm into the sample.

DMA

Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA) is measured on compression molded disks formed in a hot press at 180° C. at 10 MPa pressure for 5 minutes and then water cooled in the press at 90° C./min. Testing is conducted using an ARES controlled strain rheometer (TA Instruments) equipped with dual cantilever fixtures for torsion testing.

A 1.5 mm plaque is pressed and cut in a bar of dimensions 32×12 mm. The sample is clamped at both ends between fixtures separated by 10 mm (grip separation ΔL) and subjected to successive temperature steps from −100° C. to 200° C. (5° C. per step). At each temperature the torsion modulus G′ is measured at an angular frequency of 10 rad/s, the strain amplitude being maintained between 0.1 percent and 4 percent to ensure that the torque is sufficient and that the measurement remains in the linear regime.

An initial static force of 10 g is maintained (auto-tension mode) to prevent slack in the sample when thermal expansion occurs. As a consequence, the grip separation ΔL increases with the temperature, particularly above the melting or softening point of the polymer sample. The test stops at the maximum temperature or when the gap between the fixtures reaches 65 mm.

Melt Index

Melt index, or I₂, is measured in accordance with ASTM D 1238, Condition 190° C./2.16 kg. Melt index, or I₁₀ is also measured in accordance with ASTM D 1238, Condition 190° C./10 kg.

Melt Flow Rate

Melt flow rate, or MFR, is measured in accordance with ASTM D 1238, Condition 230° C./2.16 kg.

ATREF

Analytical temperature rising elution fractionation (ATREF) analysis is conducted according to the method described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,798,081 and Wilde, L.; Ryle, T. R.;. Knobeloch, D. C.; Peat, I. R.; Determination of Branching Distributions in Polyethylene and Ethylene Copolymers, J. Polym. Sci., 20, 441-455 (1982), which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety. The composition to be analyzed is dissolved in trichlorobenzene and allowed to crystallize in a column containing an inert support (stainless steel shot) by slowly reducing the temperature to 20° C. at a cooling rate of 0.1° C./min. The column is equipped with an infrared detector. An ATREF chromatogram curve is then generated by eluting the crystallized polymer sample from the column by slowly increasing the temperature of the eluting solvent (trichlorobenzene) from 20 to 120° C. at a rate of 1.5° C./min.

¹³C NMR Analysis

The samples are prepared by adding approximately 3 g of a 50/50 mixture of tetrachloroethane-d²/orthodichlorobenzene to 0.4 g sample in a 10 mm NMR tube. The samples are dissolved and homogenized by heating the tube and its contents to 150° C. The data are collected using a JEOL Eclipse™ 400 MHz spectrometer or a Varian Unity Plus™ 400 MHz spectrometer, corresponding to a ¹³C resonance frequency of 100.5 MHz. The data are acquired using 4000 transients per data file with a 6 second pulse repetition delay. To achieve minimum signal-to-noise for quantitative analysis, multiple data files are added together. The spectral width is 25,000 Hz with a minimum file size of 32K data points. The samples are analyzed at 130° C. in a 10 mm broad band probe. The comonomer incorporation is determined using Randall's triad method (Randall, J. C.; JMS-Rev. Macromol. Chem. Phys., C29, 201-317 (1989), which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

Polymer Fractionation by TREF

Large-scale TREF fractionation is carried by dissolving 15-20 g of polymer in 2 liters of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene (TCB) by stirring for 4 hours at 160° C. The polymer solution is forced by 15 psig (100 kPa) nitrogen onto a 3 inch by 4 foot (7.6 cm×12 cm) steel column packed with a 60:40 (v:v) mix of 30-40 mesh (600-425 μm) spherical, technical quality glass beads (available from Potters Industries, HC 30 Box 20, Brownwood, Tex., 76801) and stainless steel, 0.028″ (0.7 mm) diameter cut wire shot (available from Pellets, Inc. 63 Industrial Drive, North Tonawanda, N.Y., 14120). The column is immersed in a thermally controlled oil jacket, set initially to 160° C. The column is first cooled ballistically to 125° C., then slow cooled to 20° C. at 0.04° C. per minute and held for one hour. Fresh TCB is introduced at about 65 ml/min while the temperature is increased at 0.167° C. per minute.

Approximately 2000 ml portions of eluant from the preparative TREF column are collected in a 16 station, heated fraction collector. The polymer is concentrated in each fraction using a rotary evaporator until about 50 to 100 ml of the polymer solution remains. The concentrated solutions are allowed to stand overnight before adding excess methanol, filtering, and rinsing (approx. 300-500 ml of methanol including the final rinse). The filtration step is performed on a 3 position vacuum assisted filtering station using 5.0 μm polytetrafluoroethylene coated filter paper (available from Osmonics Inc., Cat# Z50WP04750). The filtrated fractions are dried overnight in a vacuum oven at 60° C. and weighed on an analytical balance before further testing.

Melt Strength

Melt Strength (MS) is measured by using a capillary rheometer fitted with a 2.1 mm diameter, 20:1 die with an entrance angle of approximately 45 degrees. After equilibrating the samples at 190° C. for 10 minutes, the piston is run at a speed of 1 inch/minute (2.54 cm/minute). The standard test temperature is 190° C. The sample is drawn uniaxially to a set of accelerating nips located 100 mm below the die with an acceleration of 2.4 mm/sec². The required tensile force is recorded as a function of the take-up speed of the nip rolls. The maximum tensile force attained during the test is defined as the melt strength. The melt strength is recorded in centiNewtons (“cN”).

Preparation and Properties of Olefin Block Copolymers Catalysts

The term “overnight”, if used, refers to a time of approximately 16-18 hours, the term “room temperature”, refers to a temperature of 20-25° C., and the term “mixed alkanes” refers to a commercially obtained mixture of C₆₋₉ aliphatic hydrocarbons available under the trade designation Isopar E®, from ExxonMobil Chemical Company. In the event the name of a compound herein does not conform to the structural representation thereof, the structural representation shall control. The synthesis of all metal complexes and the preparation of all screening experiments were carried out in a dry nitrogen atmosphere using dry box techniques. All solvents used were HPLC grade and were dried before their use.

MMAO refers to modified methylalumoxane, a triisobutylaluminum modified methylalumoxane available commercially from Akzo-Nobel.

The preparation of catalyst (B 1) is conducted as follows.

a) Preparation of (1-methylethyl)(2-hydroxy-3,5-di(t-butyl)phenyl)methylimine

3,5-Di-t-butylsalicylaldehyde (3.00 g) is added to 10 mL of isopropylamine. The solution rapidly turns bright yellow. After stirring at ambient temperature for 3 hours, volatiles are removed under vacuum to yield a bright yellow, crystalline solid (97 percent yield).

b) Preparation of 1,2-bis-(3,5-di-t-butylphenylene)(1-(N-(1-methylethyl)immino)methyl)(2-oxoyl) zirconium dibenzyl

A solution of (1-methylethyl)(2-hydroxy-3,5-di(t-butyl)phenyl)imine (605 mg, 2.2 mmol) in 5 mL toluene is slowly added to a solution of Zr(CH₂Ph)₄ (500 mg, 1.1 mmol) in 50 mL toluene. The resulting dark yellow solution is stirred for 30 min. Solvent is removed under reduced pressure to yield the desired product as a reddish-brown solid.

The preparation of catalyst (B2) is conducted as follows.

a) Preparation of (1-(2-methylcyclohexyl)ethyl)(2-oxoyl-3,5-di(t-butyl)phenyl)imine

2-Methylcyclohexylamine (8.44 mL, 64.0 mmol) is dissolved in methanol (90 mL), and di-t-butylsalicaldehyde (10.00 g, 42.67 mmol) is added. The reaction mixture is stirred for three hours and then cooled to −25° C. for 12 hrs. The resulting yellow solid precipitate is collected by filtration and washed with cold methanol (2×15 mL), and then dried under reduced pressure. The yield is 11.17 g of a yellow solid. 1H NMR is consistent with the desired product as a mixture of isomers.

b) Preparation of bis-(1-(2-methylcyclohexyl)ethyl)(2-oxoyl-3,5-di(t-butyl)phenyl)immino)zirconium dibenzyl

A solution of (1-(2-methylcyclohexyl)ethyl)(2-oxoyl-3,5-di(t-butyl)phenyl)imine (7.63 g, 23.2 mmol) in 200 mL toluene is slowly added to a solution of Zr(CH₂Ph)₄ (5.28 g, 11.6 mmol) in 600 mL toluene. The resulting dark yellow solution is stirred for 1 hour at 25° C. The solution is diluted further with 680 mL toluene to give a solution having a concentration of 0.00783 M.

Cocatalyst 1 A mixture of methyldi(C₁₄₋₁₈ alkyl)ammonium salts of tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)borate (here-in-after armeenium borate), prepared by reaction of a long chain trialkylamine (Armeen™ M2HT, available from Akzo-Nobel), HCl and Li[B(C₆F₅)₄], substantially as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,919,9883, Ex. 2.

Cocatalyst 2 Mixed C₁₄₋₁₈ alkyldimethylammonium salt of bis(tris(pentafluorophenyl)-alumane)-2-undecylimidazolide, prepared according to U.S. Pat. No. 6,395,671, Ex. 16.

Shuttling Agents The shuttling agents employed include diethylzinc (DEZ, SA1), di(i-butyl)zinc (SA2), di(n-hexyl)zinc (SA3), triethylaluminum (TEA, SA4), trioctylaluminum (SA5), triethylgallium (SA6), i-butylaluminum bis(dimethyl(t-butyl)siloxane) (SA7), i-butylaluminum bis(di(trimethylsilyl)amide) (SA8), n-octylaluminum di(pyridine-2-methoxide) (SA9), bis(n-octadecyl)i-butylaluminum (SA 10), i-butylaluminum bis(di(n-pentyl)amide) (SA11), n-octylaluminum bis(2,6-di-t-butylphenoxide) (SA 12), n-octylaluminum di(ethyl(1-naphthyl)amide) (SA 13), ethylaluminum bis(t-butyldimethylsiloxide) (SA14), ethylaluminum di(bis(trimethylsilyl)amide) (SA 15), ethylaluminum bis(2,3,6,7-dibenzo-1-azacycloheptaneamide) (SA 16), n-octylaluminum bis(2,3,6,7-dibenzo-1-azacycloheptaneamide) (SA17), n-octylaluminum bis(dimethyl(t-butyl)siloxide(SA18), ethylzinc (2,6-diphenylphenoxide) (SA 19), and ethylzinc (t-butoxide) (SA20).

Examples 1-4, Comparative A-C General High Throughput Parallel Polymerization Conditions

Polymerizations are conducted using a high throughput, parallel polymerization reactor (PPR) available from Symyx Technologies, Inc. and operated substantially according to U.S. Pat Nos. 6,248,540, 6,030,917, 6,362,309, 6,306,658, and 6,316,663. Ethylene copolymerizations are conducted at 130° C. and 200 psi (1.4 MPa) with ethylene on demand using 1.2 equivalents of Cocatalyst 1 based on total catalyst used (1.1 equivalents when MMAO is present). A series of polymerizations are conducted in a parallel pressure reactor (PPR) contained of 48 individual reactor cells in a 6×8 array that are fitted with a pre-weighed glass tube. The working volume in each reactor cell is 6000 μL. Each cell is temperature and pressure controlled with stirring provided by individual stirring paddles. The monomer gas and quench gas are plumbed directly into the PPR unit and controlled by automatic valves. Liquid reagents are robotically added to each reactor cell by syringes and the reservoir solvent is mixed alkanes. The order of addition is mixed alkanes solvent (4 ml), ethylene, 1-octene comonomer (1 ml), Cocatalyst 1 or Cocatalyst 1/MMAO mixture, shuttling agent, and catalyst or catalyst mixture. When a mixture of Cocatalyst 1 and MMAO or a mixture of two catalysts is used, the reagents are premixed in a small vial immediately prior to addition to the reactor. When a reagent is omitted in an experiment, the above order of addition is otherwise maintained. Polymerizations are conducted for approximately 1-2 minutes, until predetermined ethylene consumptions are reached. After quenching with CO, the reactors are cooled and the glass tubes are unloaded. The tubes are transferred to a centrifuge/vacuum drying unit, and dried for 12 hours at 60° C. The tubes containing dried polymer are weighed and the difference between this weight and the tare weight gives the net yield of polymer. Results are contained in Table 1. In Table 1 and elsewhere in the application, comparative compounds are indicated by an asterisk (*).

Examples 1-4 demonstrate the synthesis of linear block copolymers by the present invention as evidenced by the formation of a very narrow MWD, essentially monomodal copolymer when DEZ is present and a bimodal, broad molecular weight distribution product (a mixture of separately produced polymers) in the absence of DEZ. Due to the fact that Catalyst (A1) is known to incorporate more octene than Catalyst (B1), the different blocks or segments of the resulting copolymers of the invention are distinguishable based on branching or density.

TABLE 1 Cat. (A1) Cat (B1) Cocat MMAO shuttling Ex. (μmol) (μmol) (μmol) (μmol) agent (μmol) Yield (g) Mn Mw/Mn hexyls¹ A* 0.06 — 0.066 0.3 — 0.1363 300502 3.32 — B* — 0.1 0.110 0.5 — 0.1581 36957 1.22 2.5 C* 0.06 0.1 0.176 0.8 — 0.2038 45526 5.30² 5.5 1 0.06 0.1 0.192 — DEZ (8.0) 0.1974 28715 1.19 4.8 2 0.06 0.1 0.192 — DEZ (80.0) 0.1468 2161 1.12 14.4 3 0.06 0.1 0.192 — TEA (8.0) 0.208 22675 1.71 4.6 4 0.06 0.1 0.192 — TEA (80.0) 0.1879 3338 1.54 9.4 ¹C₆ or higher chain content per 1000 carbons ²Bimodal molecular weight distribution

It may be seen that the olefin block copolymers produced according to the invention have a relatively narrow polydispersity (Mw/Mn) and larger block-copolymer content (trimer, tetramer, or larger) than polymers prepared in the absence of the shuttling agent.

Further characterizing data for the polymers of Table 1 are determined by reference to the Figures. More specifically DSC and ATREF results show the following:

The DSC curve for the polymer of Example 1 shows a 115.7° C. melting point (Tm) with a heat of fusion of 158.1 J/g. The corresponding CRYSTAF curve shows the tallest peak at 34.5° C. with a peak area of 52.9 percent. The difference between the DSC Tm and the Tcrystaf is 81.2° C.

The DSC curve for the polymer of Example 2 shows a peak with a 109.7° C. melting point (Tm) with a heat of fusion of 214.0 J/g. The corresponding CRYSTAF curve shows the tallest peak at 46.2° C. with a peak area of 57.0 percent. The difference between the DSC Tm and the Tcrystaf is 63.5° C.

The DSC curve for the polymer of Example 3 shows a peak with a 120.7° C. melting point (Tm) with a heat of fusion of 160.1 J/g. The corresponding CRYSTAF curve shows the tallest peak at 66.1° C. with a peak area of 71.8 percent. The difference between the DSC Tm and the Tcrystaf is 54.6° C.

The DSC curve for the polymer of Example 4 shows a peak with a 104.5° C. melting point (Tm) with a heat of fusion of 170.7 J/g. The corresponding CRYSTAF curve shows the tallest peak at 30° C. with a peak area of 18.2 percent. The difference between the DSC Tm and the Tcrystaf is 74.5° C.

The DSC curve for Comparative A shows a 90.0° C. melting point (Tm) with a heat of fusion of 86.7 J/g. The corresponding CRYSTAF curve shows the tallest peak at 48.5° C. with a peak area of 29.4 percent. Both of these values are consistent with a resin that is low in density. The difference between the DSC Tm and the Tcrystaf is 41.8° C.

The DSC curve for Comparative B shows a 129.8° C. melting point (Tm) with a heat of fusion of 237.0 J/g. The corresponding CRYSTAF curve shows the tallest peak at 82.4° C. with a peak area of 83.7 percent. Both of these values are consistent with a resin that is high in density. The difference between the DSC Tm and the Tcrystaf is 47.4° C.

The DSC curve for Comparative C shows a 125.3° C. melting point (Tm) with a heat of fusion of 143.0 J/g. The corresponding CRYSTAF curve shows the tallest peak at 81.8° C. with a peak area of 34.7 percent as well as a lower crystalline peak at 52.4° C. The separation between the two peaks is consistent with the presence of a high crystalline and a low crystalline polymer. The difference between the DSC Tm and the Tcrystaf is 43.5° C.

Examples 5-19 Comparatives D-F Continuous Solution Polymerization, Catalyst A1/B2+DEZ

Continuous solution polymerizations are carried out in a computer controlled autoclave reactor equipped with an internal stirrer. Purified mixed alkanes solvent (Isopar™ E available from ExxonMobil Chemical Company), ethylene at 2.70 lbs/hour (1.22 kg/hour), 1-octene, and hydrogen (where used) are supplied to a 3.8 L reactor equipped with a jacket for temperature control and an internal thermocouple. The solvent feed to the reactor is measured by a mass-flow controller. A variable speed diaphragm pump controls the solvent flow rate and pressure to the reactor. At the discharge of the pump, a side stream is taken to provide flush flows for the catalyst and cocatalyst 1 injection lines and the reactor agitator. These flows are measured by Micro-Motion mass flow meters and controlled by control valves or by the manual adjustment of needle valves. The remaining solvent is combined with 1-octene, ethylene, and hydrogen (where used) and fed to the reactor. A mass flow controller is used to deliver hydrogen to the reactor as needed. The temperature of the solvent/monomer solution is controlled by use of a heat exchanger before entering the reactor. This stream enters the bottom of the reactor. The catalyst component solutions are metered using pumps and mass flow meters and are combined with the catalyst flush solvent and introduced into the bottom of the reactor. The reactor is run liquid-full at 500 psig (3.45 MPa) with vigorous stirring. Product is removed through exit lines at the top of the reactor. All exit lines from the reactor are steam traced and insulated. Polymerization is stopped by the addition of a small amount of water into the exit line along with any stabilizers or other additives and passing the mixture through a static mixer. The product stream is then heated by passing through a heat exchanger before devolatilization. The polymer product is recovered by extrusion using a devolatilizing extruder and water cooled pelletizer. Process details and results are contained in Table 2. Selected polymer properties are provided in Table 3.

TABLE 2 Process Details Cat Cat A1 Cat B2 DEZ Cocat Cocat Poly C₈H₁₆ Solv. H₂ T A1² Flow B2³ Flow DEZ Flow Conc. Flow [C₂H₄]/ Rate⁵ Conv Ex. kg/hr kg/hr sccm¹ ° C. ppm kg/hr ppm kg/hr Conc % kg/hr ppm kg/hr [DEZ]⁴ kg/hr %⁶ Solids % Eff.⁷ D* 1.63 12.7 29.90 120 142.2  0.14 — — 0.19 0.32  820 0.17 536 1.81 88.8 11.2 95.2 E* ″ 9.5 5.00 ″ — — 109   0.10 0.19 ″ 1743 0.40 485 1.47 89.9 11.3 126.8 F* ″ 11.3 251.6 ″ 71.7 0.06 30.8 0.06 — — ″ 0.11 — 1.55 88.5 10.3 257.7  5 ″ ″ — ″ ″ 0.14 30.8 0.13 0.17 0.43 ″ 0.26 419 1.64 89.6 11.1 118.3  6 ″ ″ 4.92 ″ ″ 0.10 30.4 0.08 0.17 0.32 ″ 0.18 570 1.65 89.3 11.1 172.7  7 ″ ″ 21.70 ″ ″ 0.07 30.8 0.06 0.17 0.25 ″ 0.13 718 1.60 89.2 10.6 244.1  8 ″ ″ 36.90 ″ ″ 0.06 ″ ″ ″ 0.10 ″ 0.12 1778 1.62 90.0 10.8 261.1  9 ″ ″ 78.43 ″ ″ ″ ″ ″ ″ 0.04 ″ ″ 4596 1.63 90.2 10.8 267.9 10 ″ ″ 0.00 123 71.1 0.12 30.3 0.14 0.34 0.19 1743 0.08 415 1.67 90.31 11.1 131.1 11 ″ ″ ″ 120 71.1 0.16 ″ 0.17 0.80 0.15 1743 0.10 249 1.68 89.56 11.1 100.6 12 ″ ″ ″ 121 71.1 0.15 ″ 0.07 ″ 0.09 1743 0.07 396 1.70 90.02 11.3 137.0 13 ″ ″ ″ 122 71.1 0.12 ″ 0.06 ″ 0.05 1743 0.05 653 1.69 89.64 11.2 161.9 14 ″ ″ ″ 120 71.1 0.05 ″ 0.29 ″ 0.10 1743 0.10 395 1.41 89.42 9.3 114.1 15 2.45 ″ ″ ″ 71.1 0.14 ″ 0.17 ″ 0.14 1743 0.09 282 1.80 89.33 11.3 121.3 16 ″ ″ ″ 122 71.1 0.10 ″ 0.13 ″ 0.07 1743 0.07 485 1.78 90.11 11.2 159.7 17 ″ ″ ″ 121 71.1 0.10 ″ 0.14 ″ 0.08 1743 ″ 506 1.75 89.08 11.0 155.6 18 0.69 ″ ″ 121 71.1 ″ ″ 0.22 ″ 0.11 1743 0.10 331 1.25 89.93 8.8 90.2 19 0.32 ″ ″ 122 71.1 0.06 ″ ″ ″ 0.09 1743 0.08 367 1.16 90.74 8.4 106.0 *Comparative, not an example of the invention ¹standard cm³/min ²[N-(2,6-di(1-methylethyl)phenyl)amido)(2-isopropylphenyl)(α-naphthalen-2-diyl(6-pyridin-2-diyl)methane)]hafnium dimethyl ³bis-(1-(2-methylcyclohexyl)ethyl)(2-oxoyl-3,5-di(t-butyl)phenyl)immino) zirconium dibenzyl ⁴molar ratio in reactor ⁵polymer production rate ⁶percent ethylene conversion in reactor ⁷efficiency, kg polymer/g M where g M = g Hf + g Zr

TABLE 3 Physical Properties Heat of Tm- CRYSTAF Density Mw Mn Fusion T_(m) T_(c) T_(CRYSTAF) T_(CRYSTAF) Peak Area Ex. (g/cm³) I₂ I₁₀ I₁₀/I₂ (g/mol) (g/mol) Mw/Mn (J/g) (° C.) (° C.) (° C.) (° C.) (percent) D* 0.8627 1.5 10.0 6.5 110,000 55,800 2.0 32 37 45 30 7 99 E* 0.9378 7.0 39.0 5.6 65,000 33,300 2.0 183 124 113 79 45 95 F* 0.8895 0.9 12.5 13.4 137,300 9,980 13.8 90 125 111 78 47 20  5 0.8786 1.5 9.8 6.7 104,600 53,200 2.0 55 120 101 48 72 60  6 0.8785 1.1 7.5 6.5 109600 53300 2.1 55 115 94 44 71 63  7 0.8825 1.0 7.2 7.1 118,500 53,100 2.2 69 121 103 49 72 29  8 0.8828 0.9 6.8 7.7 129,000 40,100 3.2 68 124 106 80 43 13  9 0.8836 1.1 9.7 9.1 129600 28700 4.5 74 125 109 81 44 16 10 0.8784 1.2 7.5 6.5 113,100 58,200 1.9 54 116 92 41 75 52 11 0.8818 9.1 59.2 6.5 66,200 36,500 1.8 63 114 93 40 74 25 12 0.8700 2.1 13.2 6.4 101,500 55,100 1.8 40 113 80 30 83 91 13 0.8718 0.7 4.4 6.5 132,100 63,600 2.1 42 114 80 30 81 8 14 0.9116 2.6 15.6 6.0 81,900 43,600 1.9 123 121 106 73 48 92 15 0.8719 6.0 41.6 6.9 79,900 40,100 2.0 33 114 91 32 82 10 16 0.8758 0.5 3.4 7.1 148,500 74,900 2.0 43 117 96 48 69 65 17 0.8757 1.7 11.3 6.8 107,500 54,000 2.0 43 116 96 43 73 57 18 0.9192 4.1 24.9 6.1 72,000 37,900 1.9 136 120 106 70 50 94 19 0.9344 3.4 20.3 6.0 76,800 39,400 1.9 169 125 112 80 45 88

The resulting polymers are tested by DSC and ATREF as with previous examples. Results are as follows:

The DSC curve for the polymer of Example 5 shows a peak with a 119.6° C. melting point (Tm) with a heat of fusion of 60.0 J/g. The corresponding CRYSTAF curve shows the tallest peak at 47.6° C. with a peak area of 59.5 percent. The delta between the DSC Tm and the Tcrystaf is 72.0° C.

The DSC curve for the polymer of Example 6 shows a peak with a 115.2° C. melting point (Tm) with a heat of fusion of 60.4 J/g. The corresponding CRYSTAF curve shows the tallest peak at 44.2° C. with a peak area of 62.7 percent. The delta between the DSC Tm and the Tcrystaf is 71.0° C.

The DSC curve for the polymer of Example 7 shows a peak with a 121.3° C. melting point with a heat of fusion of 69.1 J/g. The corresponding CRYSTAF curve shows the tallest peak at 49.2° C. with a peak area of 29.4 percent. The delta between the DSC Tm and the Tcrystaf is 72.1° C.

The DSC curve for the polymer of Example 8 shows a peak with a 123.5° C. melting point (Tm) with a heat of fusion of 67.9 J/g. The corresponding CRYSTAF curve shows the tallest peak at 80.1° C. with a peak area of 12.7 percent. The delta between the DSC Tm and the Tcrystaf is 43.4° C.

The DSC curve for the polymer of Example 9 shows a peak with a 124.6° C. melting point (Tm) with a heat of fusion of 73.5 J/g. The corresponding CRYSTAF curve shows the tallest peak at 80.8° C. with a peak area of 16.0 percent. The delta between the DSC Tm and the Tcrystaf is 43.8° C.

The DSC curve for the polymer of Example 10 shows a peak with a 115.6° C. melting point (Tm) with a heat of fusion of 60.7 J/g. The corresponding CRYSTAF curve shows the tallest peak at 40.9° C. with a peak area of 52.4 percent. The delta between the DSC Tm and the Tcrystaf is 74.7° C.

The DSC curve for the polymer of Example 11 shows a peak with a 113.6° C. melting point (Tm) with a heat of fusion of 70.4 J/g. The corresponding CRYSTAF curve shows the tallest peak at 39.6° C. with a peak area of 25.2 percent. The delta between the DSC Tm and the Tcrystaf is 74.1° C.

The DSC curve for the polymer of Example 12 shows a peak with a 113.2° C. melting point (Tm) with a heat of fusion of 48.9 J/g. The corresponding CRYSTAF curve shows no peak equal to or above 30° C. (Tcrystaf for purposes of further calculation is therefore set at 30° C.). The delta between the DSC Tm and the Tcrystaf is 83.2° C.

The DSC curve for the polymer of Example 13 shows a peak with a 114.4° C. melting point (Tm) with a heat of fusion of 49.4 J/g. The corresponding CRYSTAF curve shows the tallest peak at 33.8° C. with a peak area of 7.7 percent. The delta between the DSC Tm and the Tcrystaf is 84.4° C.

The DSC for the polymer of Example 14 shows a peak with a 120.8° C. melting point (Tm) with a heat of fusion of 127.9 J/g. The corresponding CRYSTAF curve shows the tallest peak at 72.9° C. with a peak area of 92.2 percent. The delta between the DSC Tm and the Tcrystaf is 47.9° C.

The DSC curve for the polymer of Example 15 shows a peak with a 114.3° C. melting point (Tm) with a heat of fusion of 36.2 J/g. The corresponding CRYSTAF curve shows the tallest peak at 32.3° C. with a peak area of 9.8 percent. The delta between the DSC Tm and the Tcrystaf is 82.0° C.

The DSC curve for the polymer of Example 16 shows a peak with a 116.6° C. melting point (Tm) with a heat of fusion of 44.9 J/g. The corresponding CRYSTAF curve shows the tallest peak at 48.0° C. with a peak area of 65.0 percent. The delta between the DSC Tm and the Tcrystaf is 68.6° C.

The DSC curve for the polymer of Example 17 shows a peak with a 116.0° C. melting point (Tm) with a heat of fusion of 47.0 J/g. The corresponding CRYSTAF curve shows the tallest peak at 43.1° C. with a peak area of 56.8 percent. The delta between the DSC Tm and the Tcrystaf is 72.9° C.

The DSC curve for the polymer of Example 18 shows a peak with a 120.5° C. melting point (Tm) with a heat of fusion of 141.8 J/g. The corresponding CRYSTAF curve shows the tallest peak at 70.0° C. with a peak area of 94.0 percent. The delta between the DSC Tm and the Tcrystaf is 50.5° C.

The DSC curve for the polymer of Example 19 shows a peak with a 124.8° C. melting point (Tm) with a heat of fusion of 174.8 J/g. The corresponding CRYSTAF curve shows the tallest peak at 79.9° C. with a peak area of 87.9 percent. The delta between the DSC Tm and the Tcrystaf is 45.0° C.

The DSC curve for the polymer of Comparative D shows a peak with a 37.3° C. melting point (Tm) with a heat of fusion of 31.6 J/g. The corresponding CRYSTAF curve shows no peak equal to and above 30° C. Both of these values are consistent with a resin that is low in density. The delta between the DSC Tm and the Tcrystaf is 7.3° C.

The DSC curve for the polymer of Comparative E shows a peak with a 124.0° C. melting point (Tm) with a heat of fusion of 179.3 J/g. The corresponding CRYSTAF curve shows the tallest peak at 79.3° C. with a peak area of 94.6 percent. Both of these values are consistent with a resin that is high in density. The delta between the DSC Tm and the Tcrystaf is 44.6° C.

The DSC curve for the polymer of Comparative F shows a peak with a 124.8° C. melting point (Tm) with a heat of fusion of 90.4 J/g. The corresponding CRYSTAF curve shows the tallest peak at 77.6° C. with a peak area of 19.5 percent. The separation between the two peaks is consistent with the presence of both a high crystalline and a low crystalline polymer. The delta between the DSC Tm and the Tcrystaf is 47.2° C.

Physical Property Testing

Polymer samples are evaluated for physical properties such as high temperature resistance properties, as evidenced by TMA temperature testing, pellet blocking strength, high temperature recovery, high temperature compression set and storage modulus ratio, G′(25° C.)/G′(100° C.). Several commercially available polymers are included in the tests: Comparative G* is a substantially linear ethylene/1-octene copolymer (AFFINITY®, available from The Dow Chemical Company), Comparative H* is an elastomeric, substantially linear ethylene/1-octene copolymer (AFFINITY®EG8100, available from The Dow Chemical Company), Comparative I is a substantially linear ethylene/1-octene copolymer (AFFINITY® PL1840, available from The Dow Chemical Company), Comparative J is a hydrogenated styrene/butadiene/styrene triblock copolymer (KRATON™ G1652, available from KRATON Polymers LLC), Comparative K is a thermoplastic vulcanizate (TPV, a polyolefin blend containing dispersed therein a crosslinked elastomer). Results are presented in Table 4.

TABLE 4 High Temperature Mechanical Properties 300% Pellet Strain TMA-1 mm Blocking Recovery Compression penetration Strength G′(25° C.)/ (80° C.) Set (70° C.) Ex. (° C.) lb/ft² (kPa) G′(100° C.) (percent) (percent) D* 51 — 9 Failed — E* 130 — 18 — — F* 70 141 (6.8)  9 Failed 100   5 104 0 (0)  6 81 49  6 110 — 5 — 52  7 113 — 4 84 43  8 111 — 4 Failed 41  9 97 — 4 — 66 10 108 — 5 81 55 11 100 — 8 — 68 12 88 — 8 — 79 13 95 — 6 84 71 14 125 — 7 — — 15 96 — 5 — 58 16 113 — 4 — 42 17 108 0 (0)  4 82 47 18 125 — 10 — — 19 133 — 9 — — G* 75 463 (22.2) 89 Failed 100  H* 70 213 (10.2) 29 Failed 100  I* 111 — 11 — — J* 107 — 5 Failed 100  K* 152 — 3 — 40

In Table 4, Comparative F (which is a physical blend of the two polymers resulting from simultaneous polymerizations using catalyst A1 and B1) has a 1 mm penetration temperature of about 70° C., while Examples 5-9 have a 1 mm penetration temperature of 100° C. or greater. Further, examples 10-19 all have a 1 mm penetration temperature of greater than 85° C., with most having 1 mm TMA temperature of greater than 90° C. or even greater than 100° C. This shows that the novel olefin block copolymers have better dimensional stability at higher temperatures compared to a physical blend of homopolymers of the comonomers. Comparative J (a commercial SEBS) has a good 1 mm TMA temperature of about 107° C., but it has very poor (high temperature 70° C.) compression set of about 100 percent and it also failed to recover (sample broke) during a high temperature (80° C.) 300 percent strain recovery. Thus, the exemplified olefin block copolymers have a unique combination of properties unavailable even in some commercially available, high performance thermoplastic elastomers.

Similarly, Table 4 shows a low (good) storage modulus ratio, G′(25° C.)/G′(100° C.), for the inventive olefin block copolymers of 6 or less, whereas a physical blend (Comparative F) has a storage modulus ratio of 9 and a random ethylene/octene copolymer (Comparative G) of similar density has a storage modulus ratio an order of magnitude greater (89). It is desirable that the storage modulus ratio of a polymer be as close to 1 as possible. Such polymers will be relatively unaffected by temperature, and fabricated articles made from such polymers can be usefully employed over a broad temperature range. This feature of low storage modulus ratio and temperature independence is particularly useful in elastomer applications such as in pressure sensitive adhesive formulations.

The data in Table 4 also demonstrate that the olefin block copolymers of the invention possess improved pellet blocking strength. In particular, Example 5 has a pellet blocking strength of 0 MPa, meaning it is free flowing under the conditions tested, compared to Comparatives F and G which show considerable blocking. Blocking strength is important since bulk shipment of polymers having large blocking strengths can result in product clumping or sticking together upon storage or shipping, resulting in poor handling properties.

High temperature (70° C.) compression set for the inventive olefin block copolymers is generally good, meaning generally less than about 80 percent, preferably less than about 70 percent and especially less than about 60 percent. In contrast, Comparatives F, G, H and J all have a 70° C. compression set of 100 percent (the maximum possible value, indicating no recovery). Good high temperature compression set (low numerical values) is especially needed for applications such as gaskets, window profiles, o-rings, and the like.

TABLE 5 Ambient Temperature Mechanical Properties Tensile 100% 300% Retractive Flex Abrasion: Notched Strain Strain Stress at Com- Stress Mod- Tensile Tensile Elongation Tensile Elongation Volume Tear Recovery Recovery 150% pression Relaxation ulus Modulus Strength at Break¹ Strength at Break Loss Strength 21° C. 21° C. Strain Set 21° C. at 50% Ex. (MPa) (MPa) (MPa)¹ (%) (MPa) (%) (mm³) (mJ) (percent) (percent) (kPa) (Percent) Strain² D* 12 5 — — 10 1074 — — 91 83 760 — — E* 895 589 — 31 1029 — — — — — — — F* 57 46 — — 12 824 93 339 78 65 400 42 —  5 30 24 14 951 16 1116 48 — 87 74 790 14 33  6 33 29 — — 14 938 — — — 75 861 13 —  7 44 37 15 846 14 854 39 — 82 73 810 20 —  8 41 35 13 785 14 810 45 461 82 74 760 22 —  9 43 38 — — 12 823 — — — — — 25 — 10 23 23 — — 14 902 — — 86 75 860 12 — 11 30 26 — — 16 1090 — 976 89 66 510 14 30 12 20 17 12 961 13 931 — 1247  91 75 700 17 — 13 16 14 — — 13 814 — 691 91 — — 21 — 14 212 160 — — 29 857 — — — — — — — 15 18 14 12 1127  10 1573 — 2074  89 83 770 14 — 16 23 20 — — 12 968 — — 88 83 1040  13 — 17 20 18 — — 13 1252 — 1274  13 83 920  4 — 18 323 239 — — 30 808 — — — — — — — 19 706 483 — — 36 871 — — — — — — — G* 15 15 — — 17 1000 — 746 86 53 110 27 50 H* 16 15 — — 15 829 — 569 87 60 380 23 — I* 210 147 — — 29 697 — — — — — — — J* — — — — 32 609 — — 93 96 1900  25 — K* — — — — — — — — — — — 30 — ¹Tested at 51 cm/minute ²measured at 38° C. for 12 hours

Table 5 shows results for mechanical properties for the new olefin block copolymers as well as for various comparison polymers at ambient temperatures. It may be seen that the inventive polymers have very good abrasion resistance when tested according to ISO 4649, generally showing a volume loss of less than about 90 mm³, preferably less than about 80 mm³, and especially less than about 50 mm³. In this test, higher numbers indicate higher volume loss and consequently lower abrasion resistance.

Tear strength as measured by tensile notched tear strength of the inventive polymers is generally 1000 mJ or higher, as shown in Table 5. Tear strength for the inventive polymers can be as high as 3000 mJ, or even as high as 5000 mJ. Comparative polymers generally have tear strengths no higher than 750 mJ.

Table 5 also shows that the polymers of the invention have better retractive stress at 150 percent strain (demonstrated by higher retractive stress values) than some of the comparative samples. Comparative Examples F, G and H have retractive stress value at 150 percent strain of 400 kPa or less, while the inventive polymers have retractive stress values at 150 percent strain of 500 kPa (Ex. 11) to as high as about 1100 kPa (Ex. 17). Polymers having higher than 150 percent retractive stress values would be quite useful for elastic applications, such as elastic fibers and fabrics, especially nonwoven fabrics. Other applications include diaper, hygiene, and medical garment waistband applications, such as tabs and elastic bands.

Table 5 also shows that stress relaxation (at 50 percent strain) is also improved (less) for the inventive polymers as compared to, for example, Comparative G. Lower stress relaxation means that the polymer retains its force better in applications such as diapers and other garments where retention of elastic properties over long time periods at body temperatures is desired.

Optical Testing

TABLE 6 Polymer Optical Properties Ex. Internal Haze (percent) Clarity (percent) 45° Gloss (percent) F* 84 22 49 G* 5 73 56  5 13 72 60  6 33 69 53  7 28 57 59  8 20 65 62  9 61 38 49 10 15 73 67 11 13 69 67 12 8 75 72 13 7 74 69 14 59 15 62 15 11 74 66 16 39 70 65 17 29 73 66 18 61 22 60 19 74 11 52 G* 5 73 56 H* 12 76 59 I* 20 75 59

The optical properties reported in Table 6 are based on compression molded films stantially lacking in orientation. Optical properties of the polymers may be varied over wide ranges, due to variation in crystallite size, resulting from variation in the quantity of chain shuttling agent employed in the polymerization.

Extractions of Multi-Block Copolymers

Extraction studies of the polymers of Examples 5, 7 and Comparative E are conducted. In the experiments, the polymer sample is weighed into a glass fritted extraction thimble and fitted into a Kumagawa type extractor. The extractor with sample is purged with nitrogen, and a 500 mL round bottom flask is charged with 350 mL of diethyl ether. The flask is then fitted to the extractor. The ether is heated while being stirred. Time is noted when the ether begins to condense into the thimble, and the extraction is allowed to proceed under nitrogen for 24 hours. At this time, heating is stopped and the solution is allowed to cool. Any ether remaining in the extractor is returned to the flask. The ether in the flask is evaporated under vacuum at ambient temperature, and the resulting solids are purged dry with nitrogen. Any residue is transferred to a weighed bottle using successive washes of hexane. The combined hexane washes are then evaporated with another nitrogen purge, and the residue dried under vacuum overnight at 40° C. Any remaining ether in the extractor is purged dry with nitrogen.

A second clean round bottom flask charged with 350 mL of hexane is then connected to the extractor. The hexane is heated to reflux with stirring and maintained at reflux for 24 hours after hexane is first noticed condensing into the thimble. Heating is then stopped and the flask is allowed to cool. Any hexane remaining in the extractor is transferred back to the flask. The hexane is removed by evaporation under vacuum at ambient temperature, and any residue remaining in the flask is transferred to a weighed bottle using successive hexane washes. The hexane in the flask is evaporated by a nitrogen purge, and the residue is vacuum dried overnight at 40° C.

The polymer sample remaining in the thimble after the extractions is transferred from the thimble to a weighed bottle and vacuum dried overnight at 40° C. Results are contained in Table 7.

TABLE 7 ether ether C₈ hexane hexane C₈ residue wt. soluble soluble mole soluble soluble mole C₈ mole Sample (g) (g) (percent) percent¹ (g) (percent) percent¹ percent¹ Comp. 1.097 0.063 5.69 12.2 0.245 22.35 13.6 6.5 F* Ex. 5 1.006 0.041 4.08 — 0.040 3.98 14.2 11.6 Ex. 7 1.092 0.017 1.59 13.3 0.012 1.10 11.7 9.9 ¹Determined by ¹³C NMR

Additional Polymer Examples 19 A-J, Continuous Solution Polymerization, Catalyst A1/B2+DEZ For Examples 19A-I

Continuous solution polymerizations are carried out in a computer controlled well-mixed reactor. Purified mixed alkanes solvent (Isopar™ E available from Exxon Mobil Chemical Company) ethylene, 1-octene, and hydrogen (where used) are combined and fed to a 27 gallon reactor. The feeds to the reactor are measured by mass-flow controllers. The temperature of the feed stream is controlled by use of a glycol cooled heat exchanger before entering the reactor. The catalyst component solutions are metered using pumps and mass flow meters. The reactor is run liquid-full at approximately 550 psig pressure. Upon exiting the reactor, water and additive are injected in the polymer solution. The water hydrolyzes the catalysts, and terminates the polymerization reactions. The post reactor solution is then heated in preparation for a two-stage devolatization. The solvent and unreacted monomers are removed during the devolatization process. The polymer melt is pumped to a die for underwater pellet cutting.

For Example 19J

Continuous solution polymerizations are carried out in a computer controlled autoclave reactor equipped with an internal stirrer. Purified mixed alkanes solvent (Isopar™ E available from ExxonMobil Chemical Company), ethylene at 2.70 lbs/hour (1.22 kg/hour), 1-octene, and hydrogen (where used) are supplied to a 3.8 L reactor equipped with a jacket for temperature control and an internal thermocouple. The solvent feed to the reactor is measured by a mass-flow controller. A variable speed diaphragm pump controls the solvent flow rate and pressure to the reactor. At the discharge of the pump, a side stream is taken to provide flush flows for the catalyst and cocatalyst injection lines and the reactor agitator. These flows are measured by Micro-Motion mass flow meters and controlled by control valves or by the manual adjustment of needle valves. The remaining solvent is combined with 1-octene, ethylene, and hydrogen (where used) and fed to the reactor. A mass flow controller is used to deliver hydrogen to the reactor as needed. The temperature of the solvent/monomer solution is controlled by use of a heat exchanger before entering the reactor. This stream enters the bottom of the reactor. The catalyst component solutions are metered using pumps and mass flow meters and are combined with the catalyst flush solvent and introduced into the bottom of the reactor. The reactor is run liquid-full at 500 psig (3.45 MPa) with vigorous stirring. Product is removed through exit lines at the top of the reactor. All exit lines from the reactor are steam traced and insulated. Polymerization is stopped by the addition of a small amount of water into the exit line along with any stabilizers or other additives and passing the mixture through a static mixer. The product stream is then heated by passing through a heat exchanger before devolatilization. The polymer product is recovered by extrusion using a devolatilizing extruder and water cooled pelletizer.

Process details and results are contained in Table 8. Selected polymer properties are provided in Tables 9A-C.

In Table 9B, inventive examples 19F and 19G show low immediate set of around 65-70% strain after 500% elongation.

TABLE 8 Polymerization Conditions Cat Cat Cat A1² Cat A1 B2³ B2 DEZ DEZ C₂H₄ C₈H₁₆ Solv. H₂ T Conc. Flow Conc. Flow Conc Flow Ex. lb/hr lb/hr lb/hr sccm¹ ° C. ppm lb/hr ppm lb/hr wt % lb/hr 19A 55.29 32.03 323.03 101 120 600 0.25 200 0.42 3.0 0.70 19B 53.95 28.96 325.3 577 120 600 0.25 200 0.55 3.0 0.24 19C 55.53 30.97 324.37 550 120 600 0.216 200 0.609 3.0 0.69 19D 54.83 30.58 326.33 60 120 600 0.22 200 0.63 3.0 1.39 19E 54.95 31.73 326.75 251 120 600 0.21 200 0.61 3.0 1.04 19F 50.43 34.80 330.33 124 120 600 0.20 200 0.60 3.0 0.74 19G 50.25 33.08 325.61 188 120 600 0.19 200 0.59 3.0 0.54 19H 50.15 34.87 318.17 58 120 600 0.21 200 0.66 3.0 0.70 19I 55.02 34.02 323.59 53 120 600 0.44 200 0.74 3.0 1.72 19J 7.46 9.04 50.6 47 120 150 0.22 76.7 0.36 0.5 0.19 Zn⁴ Cocat 1 Cocat 1 Cocat 2 Cocat 2 in Poly Conc. Flow Conc. Flow polymer Rate⁵ Conv⁶ Polymer Ex. ppm lb/hr ppm lb/hr ppm lb/hr wt % wt % Eff.⁷ 19A 4500 0.65 525 0.33 248 83.94 88.0 17.28 297 19B 4500 0.63 525 0.11 90 80.72 88.1 17.2 295 19C 4500 0.61 525 0.33 246 84.13 88.9 17.16 293 19D 4500 0.66 525 0.66 491 82.56 88.1 17.07 280 19E 4500 0.64 525 0.49 368 84.11 88.4 17.43 288 19F 4500 0.52 525 0.35 257 85.31 87.5 17.09 319 19G 4500 0.51 525 0.16 194 83.72 87.5 17.34 333 19H 4500 0.52 525 0.70 259 83.21 88.0 17.46 312 19I 4500 0.70 525 1.65 600 86.63 88.0 17.6 275 19J — — — — — — — — — ¹standard cm³/min ²[N-(2,6-di(1-methylethyl)phenyl)amido)(2-isopropylphenyl)(α-naphthalen-2-diyl(6-pyridin-2-diyl)methane)]hafnium dimethyl ³bis-(1-(2-methylcyclohexyl)ethyl)(2-oxoyl-3,5-di(t-butyl)phenyl)immino) zirconium dimethyl ⁴ppm in final product calculated by mass balance ⁵polymer production rate ⁶weight percent ethylene conversion in reactor ⁷efficiency, kg polymer/g M where g M = g Hf + g Z

TABLE 9A Polymer Physical Properties Heat of CRYSTAF Density M_(w) M_(n) Fusion T_(m) T_(c) T_(CRYSTAF) T_(m) − T_(CRYSTAF) Peak Area Ex. (g/cc) I₂ I₁₀ I₁₀/I₂ (g/mol) (g/mol) M_(w)/M_(n) (J/g) (° C.) (° C.) (° C.) (° C.) (wt %) 19A 0.8781 0.9 6.4 6.9 123700 61000 2.0 56 119 97 46 73 40 19B 0.8749 0.9 7.3 7.8 133000 44300 3.0 52 122 100 30 92 76 19C 0.8753 5.6 38.5 6.9 81700 37300 2.2 46 122 100 30 92  8 19D 0.8770 4.7 31.5 6.7 80700 39700 2.0 52 119 97 48 72  5 19E 0.8750 4.9 33.5 6.8 81800 41700 2.0 49 121 97 36 84 12 19F 0.8652 1.1 7.5 6.8 124900 60700 2.1 27 119 88 30 89 89 19G 0.8649 0.9 6.4 7.1 135000 64800 2.1 26 120 92 30 90 90 19H 0.8654 1.0 7.0 7.1 131600 66900 2.0 26 118 88 — — — 19I 0.8774 11.2 75.2 6.7 66400 33700 2.0 49 119 99 40 79 13 19J 0.8995 5.6 39.4 7.0 75500 29900 2.5 101 122 106 — — —

TABLE 9B Polymer Physical Properties of Compression Molded Film Immediate Immediate Immediate Set after Set after Set after Recovery Recovery Recovery Density Melt Index 100% Strain 300% Strain 500% Strain after 100% after 300% after 500% Example (g/cm³) (g/10 min) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) 19A 0.878 0.9 15 63 131 85 79 74 19B 0.877 0.88 14 49 97 86 84 81 19F 0.865 1 — — 70 — 87 86 19G 0.865 0.9 — — 66 — — 87 19H 0.865 0.92 — 39 — — 87 —

TABLE 9C Average Block Index for Exemplary Polymers¹ Example Zn/C₂ ² Average BI Polymer F 0 0 Polymer 8 0.56 0.59 Polymer 19a 1.3 0.62 Polymer 5 2.4 0.52 Polymer 19b 0.56 0.54 Polymer 19h 3.15 0.59 ¹Additional information regarding the calculation of the block indices for various polymers is disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/376,835, entitled “Ethylene/α-Olefin Block Interpolymers”, filed on Mar. 15, 2006, in the name of Colin L. P. Shan, Lonnie Hazlitt, et. al. and assigned to Dow Global Technologies Inc., the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. ²Zn/C₂ * 1000 = (Zn feed flow * Zn concentration/1000000/Mw of Zn)/(Total Ethylene feed flow * (1 − fractional ethylene conversion rate)/Mw of Ethylene) * 1000. Please note that “Zn” in “Zn/C₂ * 1000” refers to the amount of zinc in diethyl zinc (“DEZ”) used in the polymerization process, and “C2” refers to the amount of ethylene used in the polymerization process. Measurement of Weight Percent of Hard and Soft Segments

As discussed above, the block interpolymers comprise hard segments and soft segments. The soft segments can be present in a block interpolymer from about 1 weight percent to about 99 weight percent of the total weight of the block interpolymer, preferably from about 5 weight percent to about 95 weight percent, from about 10 weight percent to about 90 weight percent, from about 15 weight percent to about 85 weight percent, from about 20 weight percent to about 80 weight percent, from about 25 weight percent to about 75 weight percent, from about 30 weight percent to about 70 weight percent, from about 35 weight percent to about 65 weight percent, from about 40 weight percent to about 60 weight percent, or from about 45 weight percent to about 55 weight percent. Conversely, the hard segments can be present in a similar range as above. The soft segment weight percentage (and thus the hard segment weight percentage) can be measured by DSC or NMR.

Hard Segment Weight fraction Measured by DSC

For a block polymer having hard segments and soft segments, the density of the overall block polymer, ρ_(overall), satisfies the following relationship:

$\frac{1}{\rho_{overall}} = {\frac{x_{hard}}{\rho_{hard}} + \frac{x_{soft}}{\rho_{soft}}}$

where ρ_(hard), and ρ_(soft), are the theoretical density of the hard segments and soft segments, respectively. χ_(hard), and χ_(soft), are the weight fraction of the hard segments and soft segments, respectively and they add up to one. Assuming ρ_(hard) is equal to the density of ethylene homopolymer, i.e., 0.96 g/cc, and transposing the above equation, one obtains the following equation for the weight fraction of hard segments:

$x_{hard} = \frac{\frac{1}{\rho_{Overall}} - \frac{1}{\rho_{soft}}}{{- \frac{1}{\rho_{Overall}}} + \frac{1}{0.96\mspace{20mu} g\text{/}{cc}}}$

In the above equation, ρ_(overall) can be measured from the block polymer. Therefore, if ρ_(soft) is known, the hard segment weight fraction can be calculated accordingly. Generally, the soft segment density has a linear relationship with the soft segment melting temperature, which can be measured by DSC over a certain range: ρ_(soft) =A*T _(m) +B

where A and B are constants, and T_(m) is the soft segment melting temperature in degrees Celsius. A and B can be determined by running DSC on various copolymers with a known density to obtain a calibration curve. It is preferable to create a soft segment calibration curve that span the range of composition (both comonomer type and content) present in the block copolymer. In some embodiments, the calibration curve satisfies the following relationship: ρ_(soft)=0.00049*T _(m)+0.84990

Therefore, the above equation can be used to calculate the soft segment density if T_(m) in degrees Celsius is known.

For some block copolymers, there is an identifiable peak in DSC that is associated with the melting of the soft segments. In this case, it is relatively straightforward to determine Tm for the soft segments. Once T_(m) in degrees Celsius is determined from DSC, the soft segment density can be calculated and thus the hard segment weight fraction.

For other block copolymers, the peak associated with the melting of the soft segments is either a small hump (or bump) over the baseline or sometimes not visible as illustrated in FIG. 10. This difficulty can be overcome by converting a normal DSC profile into a weighted DSC profile as shown in FIG. 11. The following method is used to convert a normal DSC profile to a weighted DSC profile.

In DSC, the heat flow depends on the amount of the material melting at a certain temperature as well as on the temperature-dependent specific heat capacity. The temperature-dependence of the specific heat capacity in the melting regime of linear low density polyethylene leads to an increase in the heat of fusion with decreasing comonomer content. That is, the heat of fusion values get progressively lower as the crystallinity is reduced with increasing comonomer content. See Wild, L. Chang, S.; Shankemarayanan, M J. “Improved method for compositional analysis of polyolefins by DSC.” Polym. Prep 1990; 31: 270-1, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

For a given point in the DSC curve (defined by its heat flow in watts per gram and temperature in degrees Celsius), by taking the ratio of the heat of fusion expected for a linear copolymer to the temperature-dependent heat of fusion (ΔH(T)), the DSC curve can be converted into a weight-dependent distribution curve.

The temperature-dependent heat of fusion curve can be calculated from the summation of the integrated heat flow between two consecutive data points and then represented overall by the cumulative enthalpy curve.

The expected relationship between the heat of fusion for linear ethylene/octene copolymers at a given temperature is shown by the heat of fusion versus melting temperature curve. Using random ethylene/octene copolymers, one can obtain the following relationship: Melt Enthalpy(J/g)=0.0072*T _(m) ²(° C.)+0.3138*T _(m)(° C.)+8.9767

For each integrated data point, at a given temperature, by taking a ratio of the enthalpy from the cumulative enthalpy curve to the expected heat of fusion for linear copolymers at that temperature, fractional weights can be assigned to each point of the DSC curve.

It should be noted that, in the above method, the weighted DSC is calculated in the range from 0° C. until the end of melting. The method is applicable to ethylene/octene copolymers but can be adapted to other polymers.

Applying the above methodology to various polymers, the weight percentage of the hard segments and soft segments were calculated, which are listed in Table 10. It should be noted that sometimes it is desirable to assign 0.94 g/cc to the theoretical hard segment density, instead of using the density for homopolyethylene, due to the fact that the hard segments may include a small amount of comonomers.

TABLE 10 Calculated Weight Percentage of Hard and Soft Segments for Various Polymers Soft Segment Calculated T_(m) (° C.) from Soft Calculated Calculated Polymer weighted Segment wt % Hard wt % Example No. Overall Density DSC Density Segment Soft Segment F* 0.8895 20.3 0.860 32% 68%  5 0.8786 13.8 0.857 23% 77%  6 0.8785 13.5 0.857 23% 77%  7 0.8825 16.5 0.858 26% 74%  8 0.8828 17.3 0.858 26% 74%  9 0.8836 17.0 0.858 27% 73% 10 0.878 15.0 0.857 22% 78% 11 0.882 16.5 0.858 25% 75% 12 0.870 19.5 0.859 12% 88% 13 0.872 23.0 0.861 12% 88% 14 0.912 21.8 0.861 54% 46% 15 0.8719 0.5 0.850 22% 78% 16 0.8758 0.3 0.850 26% 74% 18 0.9192 — — — — 19 0.9344 38.0 0.869 74% 26% 17 0.8757 2.8 0.851 25% 75% 19A 0.8777 11.5 0.856 23% 77% 19B 0.8772 14.3 0.857 22% 78% 19J 0.8995 4.8 0.852 47% 53% Hard Segment Weight Percentage Measured by NMR

¹³C NMR spectroscopy is one of a number of techniques known in the art for measuring comonomer incorporation into a polymer. An example of this technique is described for the determination of comonomer content for ethylene/α-olefin copolymers in Randall (Journal of Macromolecular Science, Reviews in Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics, C29 (2 & 3), 201-317 (1989)), which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. The basic procedure for determining the comonomer content of an ethylene/olefin interpolymer involves obtaining a ¹³C NMR spectrum under conditions where the intensity of the peaks corresponding to the different carbons in a sample is directly proportional to the total number of contributing nuclei in the sample. Methods for ensuring this proportionality are known in the art and involve allowance for sufficient time for relaxation after a pulse the use of gated-decoupling techniques, relaxation agents, and the like. The relative intensity of a peak or group of peaks is obtained in practice from its computer-generated integral. After obtaining the spectrum and integrating the peaks, those peaks associated with the comonomer are assigned. This assignment can be made by reference to known spectra or literature, or by synthesis and analysis of model compounds, or by the use of isotopically labeled comonomers. The mole % comonomer can be determined by the ratio of the integrals corresponding to the number of moles of comonomer to the integrals corresponding to the number of moles of all of the monomers in the interpolymer, as described in the aforementioned Randall reference.

Since the hard segment generally has less than about 2.0 wt % comonomer, its major contribution to the spectrum is only for the integral at about 30 ppm. The hard segment contribution to the peaks not at 30 ppm is assumed negligible at the start of the analysis. So for the starting point, the integrals of the peaks not at 30 ppm are assumed to come from the soft segment only. These integrals are fit to a first order Markovian statistical model for copolymers using a linear least squares minimization, thus generating fitting parameters (i.e., probability of octene insertion after octene, P_(oo), and probability of octene insertion after ethylene, P_(eo)) that are used to compute the soft segment contribution to the 30 ppm peak. The difference between the total measured 30 ppm peak integral and the computed soft segment integral contribution to the 30 ppm peak is the contribution from the hard segment. Therefore, the experimental spectrum has now been deconvoluted into two integral lists describing the soft segment and hard segment, respectively. The calculation of weight percentage of the hard segment is straight forward and calculated by the ratio of the sum of integrals for the hard segment spectrum to the sum of integrals for the overall spectrum.

From the deconvoluted soft segment integral list, the comonomer composition can be calculated according to the method of Randall, for example. From the comonomer composition of the overall spectrum and the comonomer composition of the soft segment, one can use mass balance to compute the comonomer composition of the hard segment. From the comonomer composition of the hard segment, Bernoullian statistics is used to calculate the contribution of the hard segment to the integrals of non 30 ppm peaks. There is usually so little octene, typically from about 0 to about 1 mol %, in the hard segment that Bernoullian statistics is a valid and robust approximation. These contributions are then subtracted out from the experimental integrals of the non 30 ppm peaks. The resulting non 30 ppm peak integrals are then fitted to a first order Markovian statistics model for copolymers as described in the above paragraph. The iterative process is performed in the following manner: fit total non 30 ppm peaks then compute soft segment contribution to 30 ppm peak; then compute soft/hard segment split and then compute hard segment contribution to non 30 ppm peaks; then correct for hard segment contribution to non 30 ppm peaks and fit resulting non 30 ppm peaks. This is repeated until the values for soft/hard segment split converge to a minimum error function. The final comonomer compositions for each segment are reported.

Validation of the measurement is accomplished through the analysis of several in situ polymer blends. By design of the polymerization and catalyst concentrations the expected split is compared to the measured NMR split values. The soft/hard catalyst concentration is prescribed to be 74%/26%. The measured value of the soft/hard segment split is 78%/22%. Table 11 shows the chemical shift assignments for ethylene octene polymers.

TABLE 11 Chemical Shift Assignments for Ethylene/Octene Copolymers.   41-40.6 ppm OOOE/EOOO αα CH2 40.5-40.0 ppm EOOE αα CH2 38.9-37.9 ppm EOE CH 36.2-35.7 ppm OOE center CH 35.6-34.7 ppm OEO αγ, OOO center 6B, OOEE αδ+, OOE center 6B CH2 34.7-34.1 ppm EOE αδ+, EOE 6B CH2 33.9-33.5 ppm OOO center CH 32.5-32.1 ppm 3B CH2 31.5-30.8 ppm OEEO γγ CH2 30.8-30.3 ppm OE γδ+ CH2 30.3-29.0 ppm 4B, EEE δ+δ+ CH2 28.0-26.5 ppm OE βδ+ 5B 25.1-23.9 ppm OEO ββ 23.0-22.6 ppm 2B 14.5-14.0 ppm 1B

The following experimental procedures are used. A sample is prepared by adding 0.25 g in a 10 mm NMR tube with 2.5 mL of stock solvent. The stock solvent is made by dissolving 1 g perdeuterated 1,4-dichlorobenzene in 30 mL ortho-dichlorobenzene with 0.025 M chromium acetylacetonate (relaxation agent). The headspace of the tube is purged of oxygen by displacement with pure nitrogen. The sample tube is then heated in a heating block set at 150° C. The sample tube is repeatedly vortexed and heated until the solution flows consistently from top of the solution column to the bottom. The sample tube is then left in the heat block for at least 24 hours to achieve optimum sample homogeneity.

The ¹³C NMR data is collected using a Varian Inova Unity 400 MHz system with probe temperature set at 125° C. The center of the excitation bandwidth is set at 32.5 ppm with spectrum width set at 250 ppm. Acquisition parameters are optimized for quantitation including 90° pulse, inverse gated H decoupling, 1.3 second acquisition time, 6 seconds delay time, and 8192 scans for data averaging. The magnetic field is carefully shimmed to generate a line shape of less than 1 Hz at full width half maximum for the solvent peaks prior to data acquisition. The raw data file is processed using NUTS processing software (available from Acorn NMR, Inc. in Livermore, Calif.) and a list of integrals is generated.

Inventive Polymer 19A is analyzed for the soft/hard segment split and soft/hard comonomer composition. The following is the list of integrals for this polymer. The NMR spectrum for Polymer 19A is shown in FIG. 12.

Integral limit Integral value 41.0-40.6 ppm 1.067 40.5-40.0 ppm 6.247 38.9-37.9 ppm 82.343 36.2-35.7 ppm 14.775 35.6-34.7 ppm 65.563 34.7-34.1 ppm 215.518 33.9-33.5 ppm 0.807 32.5-32.1 ppm 99.612 31.5-30.8 ppm 14.691 30.8-30.3 ppm 115.246 30.3-29.0 ppm 1177.893 28.0-26.5 ppm 258.294 25.1-23.9 ppm 19.707 23.0-22.6 ppm 100 14.5-14.0 ppm 99.895

Using Randall's triad method, the total octene weight percentage in this sample is determined to be 34.6%. Using all the above integrals excluding the 30.3-29.0 ppm integral to fit a first order Markovian statistical model, the values for Poo and Peo are determined to be 0.08389 and 0.2051, respectively. Using these two parameters, the calculated integral contribution from the soft segment to the 30 ppm peak is 602.586. Subtraction of 602.586 from the observed total integral for the 30 ppm peak, 1177.893, yields the contribution of the hard segment to the 30 ppm peak of 576.307. Using 576.307 as the integral for the hard segment, the weight percentage of hard segment is determined to be 26%. Therefore the soft segment weight percentage is 100−26=74%. Using the above values for P_(oo) and P_(eo), the octene weight percentage of the soft segment is determined to be 47%. Using the overall octene weight percentage and the octene weight percentage of the soft segment as well as the soft segment weight percentage, the octene weight percentage in the hard segment is calculated to be negative 2 wt %. This value is within the error of the measurement. Thus there is no need to iterate back to account for hard segment contribution to non 30 ppm peaks. Table 12 summarizes the calculation results for Polymers 19A, B, F and G.

TABLE 12 Hard and Soft Segments Data for Polymers 19A, B, F and G wt % wt % octene in wt % Soft Hard Soft Example Segment Segment Segment 19A 74 26 47 19B 74 26 48 19F 86 14 49 19G 84 16 49

Comparative Examples L-P

Comparative Example L was a f-PVC, i.e., flexible poly(vinyl chloride), (obtained from Wofoo Plastics, Hong Kong, China). Comparative Example M was a SBS copolymer, VECTOR™ 7400 (obtained from Dexco Polymers, Houston, Tex.). Comparative Example N was a partially crosslinked TPV, VYRAM™ TPV 9271-65 (obtained from Advanced Elastomer Systems, Akron, Ohio). Comparative Example 0 was a SEBS copolymer, KRATON™ G2705 (obtained from KRATON Polymers LLC, Houston, Tex.). Comparative Example P was a SBS copolymer, KRATON® G3202 (obtained from KRATON Polymers LLC, Houston, Tex.).

Examples 20-26

Example 20 was 100% of Example 19f. Example 21 was similar to Example 20, except that 30% of Example 19f was replaced with a high density polyethylene (HDPE), DMDA-8007 (from The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Mich.). Example 22 was similar to Example 20, except that 20% of Example 19f was replaced with DMDA-8007. Example 23 was similar to Example 20, except that 10% of Example 19f was replaced with DMDA-8007. Example 24 was similar to Example 20, except that 30% of Example 19f was replaced with a homopolymer polypropylene, H700-12 (from The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Mich.). Example 25 was similar to Example 20, except that 20% of Example 19f was replaced with H700-12. Example 26 was similar to Example 20, except that 10% of Example 19f was replaced with H700-12.

Comparative Examples Q-X

Comparative Example Q was similar to Example 21, except that Example 19f was replaced with a polyolefin elastomer, ENGAGE® ENR 7380 (from DuPont Dow Elastomers, Wilmington, Del.). Comparative Example R was similar to Example 24, except that Example 19f was replaced with ENGAGE® ENR 7380. Comparative Example S was similar to Example 20, except that Example 19f was replaced with a polyolefin elastomer, ENGAGE® 8407 (from DuPont Dow Elastomers, Wilmington, Del.) and the sample is 30 mil (0.762 mm) thick. Comparative Example T was similar to Example 20, except that Example 19f was replaced with a polyolefin elastomer, ENGAGE® 8967 (from DuPont Dow Elastomers, Wilmington, Del.). Comparative Example U was similar to Example 24, except that Example 19f was replaced with a propylene-ethylene copolymers, VERSIFY® DE3300 (from The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Mich.). Comparative Example V was similar to Example 24, except that Example 19f was replaced with a propylene-ethylene copolymer, VERSIFY® DE3400 (from The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Mich.). Comparative Example W was similar to Example 22, except that Example 19f was replaced with VERSIFY® DE3300. Comparative Example X was similar to Example 322 except that Example 19f was replaced with VERSIFY® DE3400.

Examples 27-33

Example 27 was a mixture of 56% of Example 19f, 16% of H700-12, and 28% of RENOIL® 625 (an oil from Renkert Oil Elversony, Pa.). Example 28 was similar to Example 27, except that the mixture was 33% of Example 19f, 17% of H700-12, and 50% of RENOIL® 625. Example 29 was similar to Example 27, except that the mixture was 56% of Example 19f, 16% of DMDA-8007, and 28% of RENOIL® 625. Example 30 was similar to Example 27, except that the mixture was 33% of Example 19f, 17% of DMDA-8007, and 50% of RENOIL® 625. Example 31 was similar to Example 27, except that the mixture was 17% of Example 19f, 16% of H700-12, 16% of KRATON® G2705 and 50% of RENOIL® 625. Example 32 was similar to Example 20, except that 1% of AMPACET® 10090 (an Erucamide concentrate from Ampacet Corporation, Tarrytown, N.Y.), was added as the slip/anti-blocking agent. Example 33 was similar to Example 32, except that 5% of AMPACET® 10090 was added as the slip/anti-blocking agent.

Mechanical and Physical Properties Measurements

The Thermomechanical (TMA) properties, hardness, compression set properties, flexural modulus, gull wing tear strength, Vicat softening point, blocking property, scratch mar resistance, ultimate elongation, 100% modulus, 300% modulus, ultimate tensile strength, and yield strength of Comparative Examples L-X and Examples 20-33 were measured and the results are shown in Tables 13 and 14 below.

The penetration temperature by thermal mechanical analysis (TMA) technique was conducted on 30 mm diameter×3.3 mm thick, compression molded discs, formed at 180° C. and 10 MPa molding pressure for 5 minutes and then air quenched. The instrument used was a Perkin-Elmer TMA 7. In the TMA test, a probe with 1.5 mm radius tip (P/N N519-0416) was applied to the surface of the sample disc with 1N force. The temperature was raised at 5° C./minute from 25° C. The probe penetration distance was measured as a function of temperature. The experiment ended when the probe had penetrated 0.1 mm and 1 mm respectively into the sample. The 0.1 mm and 1 mm penetration temperatures of each example are listed in Table 13 below.

The Shore D hardness of each sample was measured according to ASTM D 2240, which is incorporated herein by reference.

The compression set properties of each sample at 23° C. and 70° C. were measured according to ASTM D 4703, which is incorporated herein by reference.

The flexural modulus of each sample was measured according to the method described in ASTM D 790, which is incorporated herein by reference.

The gull wing tear strength of each sample was measured according to the method described in ASTM D 1004, which is incorporated herein by reference.

The Vicat softening point of each sample was measured according to the method described in ASTM D1525, which is incorporated herein by reference.

The blocking of each sample was measured by stacking six each 4″×4″×0.125″ injection molded plaques, leaving the plaques at ambient conditions (73 F) for 24 hours, then un-stacking the plaques. The blocking rating is between 1 and 5 with 5 being excellent (all the plaques easily un-stacked) to 1 being unacceptable (where the 6 plaques had adhered to each other so much that none of the plaques could be separated by hand).

The scratch mar resistance of each sample was measured by manually scribing an X on a 4×4×0.125 inch plaque from corner to corner with a rounded plastic stylus. The scratch mar resistance rating is between 1 and 5 with 5 is excellent (where no evidence of the X is visible) and 1 is unacceptable (where the X is highly visible and can not be rubbed off).

The 100% modulus, 300% modulus, ultimate tensile strength, ultimate elongation, and yield strength of each sample were measured according to ASTM D 412, which is incorporated herein by reference.

TABLE 13 0.1 mm 1.0 mm Compression Compression Flexural Tear Vicat TMA TMA Set at Set at Modulus Strength Softening Scratch Mar Sample (° C.) (° C.) Shore D 70° C. 23° C. (psi) (lbs/in) Point (° C.) Blocking Resistance Comp. Ex. L 49 129 53 67 49 26654 391 69 5 4 Comp. Ex. M 25 78 10 91 17  1525 / 58 5 4 Comp. Ex. N 60 146 15 51 30  4613 149 65 4 4 Comp. Ex. O 71 137 / 40 21  2781 169 / 3 1 Comp. Ex. P 53 71 / 106  15  2043 149 / 1 1 Example 20 67 99 17 57 21  4256 206 44 1 1 Example 21 94 111 34 55 43 22071 441 66 1 1 Example 22 98 113 33 56 31 14261 323 59 1 1 Example 23 74 103 25 52 28  6943 254 50 1 1 Example 24 99 111 36 66 37 24667 421 67 1 1 Example 25 84 104 30 61 29 12325 331 55 1 1 Example 26 81 104 24 61 23 / 257 47 1 1 Comp. Ex. Q 101 119 41 63 10 21358 426 59 1 1 Comp. Ex. R 101 146 41 97 27 20267 / 58 3 3 Comp. Ex. S 35 52 16 112  35  2116 186 / 1 1 Comp. Ex. T 48 95 22 83 37  6475 234 / 2 1 Comp. Ex. U 116 142 40 / / / / / 3 4 Comp. Ex. V 53 113 33 / / 21348 / / 1 3 Comp. Ex. W 68 95 33 76 44 11497 328 / 2 3 Comp. Ex. X 40 64 25 87 40 11384 281 / 1 1 Example 27 76 105 18 48 28 / 252 / 2 1 Example 28 49 95 13 57 27 / 177 / 2 2 Example 29 63 106 18 42 30 / 215 47 2 1 Example 30 54 99 10 / / / / 48 2 2 Example 31 48 99 12 55 41 / / 57 3 2 Example 32 69 99 20 54 21 / / 44 5 4 Example 33 74 99 19 52 19 / / 44 5 5

TABLE 14 Ultimate 100% 300% Tensile Ultimate Yield Modulus Modulus Strength Elongation Strength Sample (psi) (psi) (psi) (%) (psi) Comp. Ex. L 1934 0 2522 224 607 Comp. Ex. M 198 140 549 505 45 Comp. Ex. N 336 175 604 459 122 Comp. Ex. O 213 118 1038 656 82 Comp. Ex. P 613 0 563 97 253 Example 20 333 130 672 1039 162 Example 21 795 258 1430 1007 652 Example 22 589 198 1062 1026 443

Comparative Examples L, M, N, O and P are commercial flexible molded goods resins which are not olefin-based. Examples 20-26 are various embodiments of the olefin block copolymer (as a base resin or as a blend of the base resin with PP and/or HDPE) demonstrating the improved balance of low modulus and high upper service temperature. Comparative Examples Q-X are commercial flexible molded good resins that are olefin-based. Examples 20-26 demonstrate the improved balance of low modulus and high upper service temperature over Comparative Examples Q-X.

SEBS/Inventive Interpolymer Blends

Blends of ethylene/α-olefin block copolymer and hydrogenated styrenics block copolymer (OBC/SEBS) were prepared using a Haake Rheomix 300 rheometer. The temperature of the sample bowl was set at 190° C. and the rotor speed was 40 rpm. After all the components were added, the mixing was continued for about five minutes or until a stable torque has been established. Samples for further testing and evaluation were compression molded a Garver automatic press at 190° C. under 44.45 kN force for 3 minutes. The molten materials were subsequently quenched with the press equilibrated at room temperature using an electronic cooling bath.

Comparative Examples Y1-Y5

Comparative Example Y1 was 100% of KRATON® G61652, a styrene-ethylene/butylenes-styrene block copolymer available from KRATON Polymers LLC, Houston, Tex. Comparative Example Y1 was the same as Comparative Example J*. Comparative Example Y2 was a blend of 75% of KRATON® G1652 and 25% of AFFINITY® EG8100. Comparative Example Y3 was a blend of 50% of KRATON® G1652 and 50% of AFFINITY® EG8100. Comparative Example Y4 was a blend of 25% of KRATON®G1652 and 75% of AFFINITY® EG8100. Comparative Example Y5 was 100% AFFINITY® EG8100. Comparative Example Y5 was the same as Comparative Example H*.

Examples 34-45

Example 34 was a blend of 75% of KRATON® G1652 and 25% of Example or Polymer 19a. Example 35 was a blend of 50% of KRATON® G1652 and 50% of Example 19a. Example 36 was a blend of 25% of KRATON® G1652 and 75% of Example 19a. Example 37 was the same as Example 19a. Example 38 was a blend of 75% of KRATON® G1652 and 25% of Example 19b. Example 39 was a blend of 50% of KRATON® G1652 and 50% of Example 19b. Example 40 was a blend of 25% of KRATON® G1652 and 75% of Example 19b. Example 41 was the same as Example 19b. Example 42 was a blend of 75% of KRATON® G1652 and 25% of Polymer 19i. Polymer 19i was an interpolymer prepared substantially similarly to Examples 1-19 and Example 19a-19h. One skilled in the art would know how to manipulate process conditions, such as shuttling agent ratios, hydrogen flow, monomer concentration, etc., to make a target polymer using the process conditions already detailed in the instant application. Example 43 was a blend of 50% of KRATON® G1652 and 50% of Polymer 19i. Example 44 was a blend of 25% of KRATON® G1652 and 75% of Polymer 19i. Example 45 was 100% of Polymer 19i.

Mechanical and Physical Properties Measurement

The thermomechanical (TMA) properties, elastic recovery at 300% strain, elongation at break, tensile strength and Elmendorf tear strength of comparative examples Y1-Y5 and Examples 34-45 were measured by methods described herein and known to one of skill in the art and the results are shown in Table 15 below.

TABLE 15 Compositions and properties of SEBS blends of Examples 34-45 and Comparative Examples Y1-Y5. TMA Elastic Elongation Tensile Component Temperature Recovery @ Break Strength Elmendorf tear B content, % Component B² (° C.)¹ @ 300% strain (%) (MPa) (g/mil) Comparative Example Y1 0 AFFINITY ® EG8100³ 97 92 589.8 21.2 70.2 Comparative Example Y2 25 AFFINITY ® EG8100 86 90 675.8 23.82 81.04 Comparative Example Y3 50 AFFINITY ® EG8100 71 82 664.3 17.08 47.57 Comparative Example Y4 75 AFFINITY ® EG8100 63.3 73 746.5 17.44 43.16 Comparative Example Y5 100 AFFINITY ® EG8100 60.2 61.7 777.4 13.52 55.6 Example 34 25 19a⁴ 100 92 742.4 28.46 50.71 Example 35 50 19a 103 89 763.3 18.75 51.02 Example 36 75 19a 106 83.7 827.9 17.77 56.89 Example 37 100 19a 107.2 78.3 986.4 13.63 204.3 Example 38 25 19b⁵ 99.5 92.7 693.6 24.45 41.27 Example 39 50 19b 101 90 770.8 21.1 36.05 Example 40 75 19b 104.9 86 813.1 18.18 34.7 Example 41 100 19b 106 80 931.5 13.93 67.76 Example 42 25 19i⁶ 100 93.3 672 22.13 47.11 Example 43 50 19i 102.5 91 704.1 15.62 34.76 Example 44 75 19i 103.7 88 1059 18.42 20.85 Example 45 100 19i 108 80.2 1518 13.3 39.5 Notes: ¹TMA temperature was measured at 1 mm penetration with a heating rate of 5° C./min under 1N force. ²The rest is Component A which is KRATON ® G1652, a SEBS available from KRATON Polymers LLC. ³AFFINITY ® EG8100 is a substantially linear ethylene/1-octene copolymer having I₂ of 1 g/10 min. (ASTM D-1238) and density of 0.870 g/cc (ASTM D-792). ⁴19a is an inventive ethylene/octene copolymer having I₂ of 1 g/10 min. and density of 0.878 g/cc. ⁵19b is an inventive ethylene/octene copolymer having I₂ of 1 g/10 min. and density of 0.875 g/cc. ⁶19i is an inventive ethylene/butene copolymer having I₂ of 1 g/10 min. and density of 0.876 g/cc.

Elastic recovery properties of exemplary blends (i.e., Examples 34-45) and Comparative Examples Y1-Y5 at various amounts of SEBS (i.e., KRATON® G1652) in the blend are shown in FIG. 13. The TMA temperatures of exemplary blends and Comparative Examples Y1-Y5 at various amounts of SEBS in the blend are shown in FIG. 14. As seen in Table 15 and FIGS. 13-14, the exemplary blends (i.e., Examples 34-45) exhibit improved heat resistance and elastic recovery properties over the corresponding Comparative Examples Y1-Y5.

Additional Examples Examples 46-49

Examples 46-49 were prepared in a similar fashion as Examples 19A-J above. Table 16 gives the polymerization conditions for the preparation of these examples, Table 17 gives physical property information for these polymers and Table 18 gives hard and soft segment data for these polymers.

TABLE 16 Polymerization Conditions Cat Cat A1 Cat B2 DEZ Cocat Cocat Poly C₈H₁₆ Solv. T A1² Flow B2³ Flow DEZ Flow Conc. Flow [C₂H₄]/ Rate⁵ Conv Ex. kg/hr kg/hr H₂ sccm¹ ° C. ppm kg/hr ppm kg/hr Conc % kg/hr ppm kg/hr [DEZ]⁴ kg/hr 6% Solids % Eff.⁷ 46 107 1105 900 120 575 2.07 100 0.93 5 1.14 5700 1.88 730 234 88% 17.5 182 47 81.8 343.9 2131 120 358.97 0.94 298.9 0.18 4.99 0.49 5751.6 0.62 1.96 84.5 91% 17.6 214.9 48 105 1107 897 120 575 1.7 100 0.67 5 0.81 5700 1.52 1312 238 88% 18 228 49 117 1091 1734 120 568 1.45 100 1.02 5 1.15 5535 1.46 1047 247 88% 18.4 266 ¹standard cm³/min ²[N-(2,6-di(1-methylethyl)phenyl)amido)(2-isopropylphenyl)(α-naphthalen-2-diyl(6-pyridin-2-diyl)methane)]hafnium dimethyl ³bis-(1-(2-methylcyclohexyl)ethyl)(2-oxoyl-3,5-di(t-butyl)phenyl)immino) zirconium dimethyl ⁴ppm in final product calculated by mass balance ⁵polymer production rate ⁶weight percent ethylene conversion in reactor ⁷efficiency, kg polymer/g M where g M = g Hf + g Z

TABLE 17 Polymer Physical Properties Heat of Density Mw Mn Fusion T_(m) T_(c) T_(CRYSTAF) Tm − T_(CRYSTAF) CRYSTAF Peak Ex. (g/cm³) I₂ I₁₀ I₁₀/I₂ (g/mol) (g/mol) Mw/Mn (J/g) (° C.) (° C.) (° C.) (° C.) Area (percent) 46 0.866 5.2 36.3 7 89500 45300 2.0 25 119 97 n/a n/a n/a 47 0.867 10.1 71.1 7 71200 32200 2.2 33 117 98 n/a n/a n/a 48 0.866 0.9 0.0 7.3 134900 63300 2.1 22 119 98 n/a n/a n/a 49 0.873 10.1 0.0 7.6 78000 39100 2.0 35.59 119.4 102.2 n/a n/a n/a n/a: denotes not available.

TABLE 18 Hard and Soft Segment Data for Polymers 46-49 wt % wt % octene in wt % Soft Hard Soft Example Segment Segment Segment 46 0.855 15 85 47 0.855 15 85 48 0.855 15 85 49 0.853 30 70

Examples 50-109

Tables 19 and 20 give physical information on the styrenic block copolymers used in Examples 50-109, which are examples of blend compositions of the present invention. Compositions and tensile properties of these blends are given in Table 21.

TABLE 19 Styrenic Block Copolymers G1657 G1652 Parameter Units Test Method linear SEBS triblock linear SEBS triblock Polystyrene content weight % BAM 919 12.3-14.3 29.0-30.8 Solution viscosity[a] cps BAM 922 1,200-1,800 400-525 Styrene/Rubber ratio % 13/87 30/70 Diblock content % 30 <1 Melt index gms/10 min 230° C., 5 kg 22 5 Specific gravity g/cm3 0.89 0.91 Shore A (10 s)[b] 47 69 Tensile strength MPa [c] 900 600 Elongation % [c] 13.9 22 2% Secant Modulus MPa [c] 3.9 19 Permanent Set % [d] 22 16 [a] 20% w toluene solution at 25° C. [b] Typical values on polymer compression molded at about 150° C. (300° F.) [c] Tensile Test at Ambient Conditions (see description in this document) [d] 300% Hysteresis Test at Ambient Conditions (see description in this document)

TABLE 20 Additional Styrenic Block Copolymers Test VECTOR 4111 VECTOR 4211 Parameter Units Method linear SIS triblock linear SIS triblock Styrene weight % 18 30 Diblock Content weight % <1.0 <1.0 MFR(1) g/10 min ASTM D-1238 12 13 Specific Gravity g/cm3 ASTM D-792 0.93 0.94 Tensile Strength MPa (2.3) 16.0 22.0 Elongation % (2.3) 1300 1174 2% Secant Modulus MPa (2.3) 1.6 4.6 Permanent Set % (2.4) 9 8 (1) Condition G (200° C., 5 kg) (2) Typical values on compression molded plaques (3) Tensile Test at Ambient Conditions (see description in this document) (4) 300% Hysteresis Test at Ambient Conditions (see description in this document)

TABLE 21 Blends and Tensile Measurements of Inventive Compositions 2% Sec Elongation Tensile Set after 300% Blend Blend Blend Component 1/ Mod at Break Strength Hysteresis Example Component 1 Component 2 Blend Component 2 (MPa) (i) (%) (i) (MPa) (i) (%) (ii) 50 A1^(a) 47 25/75 3.9 2100 5.5 0 51 A1^(a) 47 50/50 3.3 1700 3.2 34 52 A1^(a) 47 75/25 1.8 1000 1.8 35 53 A1^(a) 46 25/75 3.3 2300 4.6 39 54 A1^(a) 46 50/50 1.4 1700 2.4 37 55 A1^(a) 46 75/25 1.5 1100 1.8 34 56 A1^(a) 48 25/75 4.7 1400 7.8 36 57 A1^(a) 48 50/50 0.5 400 1.1 32 58 A1^(a) 48 75/25 0.9 1500 3.8 30 59 A1^(a) 49 25/75 8.1 2200 3.5 42 60 A1^(a) 49 50/50 4.5 1200 2.0 34 61 A1^(a) 49 75/25 1.4 1200 1.8 30 62 A2^(b) 47 25/75 6.6 1800 5.0 34 63 A2^(b) 47 50/50 7.6 1500 5.1 28 64 A2^(b) 47 75/25 18.0 1400 5.9 20 65 A2^(b) 46 25/75 7.3 2200 4.5 36 66 A2^(b) 46 50/50 14.7 1600 4.2 26 67 A2^(b) 46 75/25 6.6 1200 6.6 19 68 A2^(b) 48 25/75 6.7 1400 7.8 33 69 A2^(b) 48 50/50 8.5 1000 4.8 22 70 A2^(b) 48 75/25 9.3 1300 8.8 18 71 A2^(b) 49 25/75 13.9 2000 3.4 39 72 A2^(b) 49 50/50 10.1 1300 4.3 28 73 A2^(b) 49 75/25 5.5 1500 10.4 18 74 A3^(c) 47 25/75 12.0 1733 5.0 33 75 A3^(c) 47 50/50 19.3 1115 6.0 24 76 A3^(c) 47 75/25 7.6 1199 15.1 18 77 A3^(c) 46 25/75 9.5 1922 4.2 34 78 A3^(c) 46 50/50 10.1 1084 5.5 26 79 A3^(c) 46 75/25 8.3 1212 12.4 21 80 A3^(c) 48 25/75 10.6 1229 7.7 35 81 A3^(c) 48 50/50 9.5 1128 8.4 25 82 A3^(c) 48 75/25 7.3 1229 15.6 19 83 A3^(c) 49 25/75 12.8 2108 3.3 48 84 A3^(c) 49 50/50 18.4 996 3.1 33 85 A3^(c) 49 75/25 7.9 1158 13.0 21 86 A4^(d) 47 25/75 8.5 1800 4.7 29 87 A4^(d) 47 50/50 5.4 1100 8.0 26 88 A4^(d) 47 75/25 4.3 1000 9.9 21 89 A4^(d) 46 25/75 7.0 1900 3.2 29 90 A4^(d) 46 50/50 5.6 1100 8.4 24 91 A4^(d) 46 75/25 4.3 1000 10.0 22 92 A4^(d) 48 25/75 6.1 1400 8.2 27 93 A4^(d) 48 50/50 6.3 1200 11.1 25 94 A4^(d) 48 75/25 3.8 900 8.4 22 95 A4^(d) 49 25/75 10.2 1000 2.8 36 96 A4^(d) 49 50/50 8.0 1000 8.4 27 97 A4^(d) 49 75/25 5.0 1000 9.7 24 98 A5^(e) 47 25/75 9.9 1000 6.9 32 99 A5^(e) 47 50/50 11.9 700 10.2 27 100 A5^(e) 47 75/25 10.9 700 17.3 17 101 A5^(e) 46 25/75 7.8 1100 6.0 32 102 A5^(e) 46 50/50 18.3 700 11.8 26 103 A5^(e) 46 75/25 45.3 700 20.6 25 104 A5^(e) 48 25/75 11.3 900 9.3 29 105 A5^(e) 48 50/50 9.6 800 14.5 19 106 A5^(e) 48 75/25 17.3 600 16.6 20 107 A5^(e) 49 25/75 9.1 900 6.3 45 108 A5^(e) 49 50/50 29.4 600 9.6 28 109 A5^(e) 49 75/25 22.0 600 15.9 23 Notes: ^(a)Vector 4111 from Dexco Polymers LP ^(b)Vector 4211 from Dexco Polymers LP ^(c)Vector 8508 from Dexco Polymers LP ^(d)KRATON G1657 from KRATON Polymers LLC ^(e)KRATON G1652 from KRATON Polymers LLC (i) Tensile Test at Ambient Conditions (see description in this document) (ii) 300% Hysteresis Test at Ambient Conditions (see description in this document)

Table 22 shows composition and tensile measurements for ternary blends of an olefin block copolymer, a linear SIS triblock polymer, Vector 4111, a linear SEBS triblock polymer, KRATON G1657 and a linear SBS triblock polymer, Vector 8508.

TABLE 22 Ternary Blends Immediate Blend Blend Blend Blend Set Compo- Compo- Compo- Compo- Blend Blend Elongation Tensile 2% Secant after nent 1 nent 2 nent 3 nent 1 Component 2 Component 3 at Strength Modulus 300% Example Resin Resin Resin (%) (%) (%) Break % (i) (MPa) (i) (MPa) (i) Strain (%) (ii) 110 46 A4^(c) A1^(a) 45 10 45 1300 4.1 2.9 27 111 46 A4^(c) A3^(b) 45 10 45 1000 5.6 8.2 29 112 48 A4^(c) A1^(a) 45 10 45 1100 4.4 3.4 25 113 48 A4^(c) A3^(b) 45 10 45 1200 10.8 8.5 25 Notes: ^(a)Vector 4111 from Dexco Polymers LP ^(b)Vector 8508 from Dexco Polymers LP ^(c)KRATON G1657 from KRATON Polymers LLC (i) Tensile Test at Ambient Conditions (see description in this document) (ii) 300% Hysteresis Test at Ambient Conditions (see description in this document)

FIG. 14 shows the elastic recovery inventive and comparative examples which comprise SEBS (see table 15). At similar SEBS level, the inventive compositions exhibit greater recovery compared to the comparative examples. Higher recovery is generally recognized as advantaged behavior in the form of greater elasticity.

FIG. 15 compares the elasticity as measured by permanent set of examples comprising ethylene x-olefin and SIS. Examples 54 and 57 exhibit 37 and 32% permanent set, respectively. Examples 110 and 112 have the same proportion of ethylene (X-olefin to SIS but with 10% SEBS in the overall composition. These examples exhibit similar permanent set compared to examples 90 and 93 which comprise ethylene α-olefin and SEBS and no SIS. This result shows the utility of ternary blends. Though not intended to be limited by theory, it is thought that compatibility is enhanced in a ternary blend.

While the invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, the specific features of one embodiment should not be attributed to other embodiments of the invention. No single embodiment is representative of all aspects of the invention. In some embodiments, the compositions or methods may include numerous compounds or steps not mentioned herein. In other embodiments, the compositions or methods do not include, or are substantially free of, any compounds or steps not enumerated herein. Variations and modifications from the described embodiments exist. Finally, any number disclosed herein should be construed to mean approximate, regardless of whether the word “about” or “approximately” is used in describing the number. The appended claims intend to cover all those modifications and variations as falling within the scope of the invention. 

1. A composition comprising: at least one ethylene/α-olefin interpolymer, wherein the ethylene/α-olefin interpolymer (a) has a Mw/Mn from about 1.7 to about 3.5, at least one melting point, Tm, in degrees Celsius, and a density, d, in grams/cubic centimeter, wherein the numerical values of Tm and d correspond to the relationship: Tm>−2002.9+4538.5(d)−2422.2(d)²; or (b) has a Mw/Mn from about 1.7 to about 3.5, and is characterized by a heat of fusion, ΔH in J/g, and a delta quantity, ΔT, in degrees Celsius defined as the temperature difference between the tallest DSC peak and the tallest CRYSTAF peak, wherein the numerical values of ΔT and ΔH have the following relationships: ΔT>−0.1299(ΔH)+62.81 for ΔH greater than zero and up to 130 J/g, ΔT≧48° C. for ΔH greater than 130 J/g, wherein the CRYSTAF peak is determined using at least 5 percent of the cumulative polymer, and if less than 5 percent of the polymer has an identifiable CRYSTAF peak, then the CRYSTAF temperature is 30° C.; or (c) is characterized by an elastic recovery, Re, in percent at 300 percent strain and 1 cycle measured with a compression-molded film of the ethylene/α-olefin interpolymer, and has a density, d, in grams/cubic centimeter, wherein the numerical values of Re and d satisfy the following relationship when ethylene/α-olefin interpolymer is substantially free of a cross-linked phase: Re>1481-1629(d); or (d) has a molecular fraction which elutes between 40° C. and 130° C. when fractionated using TREF, characterized in that the fraction has a molar comonomer content of at least 5 percent higher than that of a comparable random ethylene interpolymer fraction eluting between the same temperatures, wherein said comparable random ethylene interpolymer has the same comonomer(s) and has a melt index, density, and molar comonomer content (based on the whole polymer) within 10 percent of that of the ethylene/α-olefin interpolymer; or (e) has a storage modulus at 25° C., G′(25° C.), and a storage modulus at 100° C., G′(100° C.), wherein the ratio of G′(25° C.) to G′(100° C.) is in the range of about 1:1 to about 9:1; and, at least one styrenic block copolymer, or a combination thereof; wherein the ethylene/α-olefin interpolymer has a density of from about 0.85 to about 0.885 g/cc.
 2. The composition of claim 1 wherein the ethylene/α-olefin interpolymer has a density of from about 0.86 to about 0.885 g/cc.
 3. The composition of claim 2 further comprising polystyrene-saturated polybutadiene-polystyrene.
 4. The composition of claim 1 wherein the ethylene/α-olefin interpolymer has a melt index (I₂) of from about 0.5 g/10 min. to about 20 g/10 min.
 5. The composition of claim 4 further comprising polystyrene-saturated polybutadiene-polystyrene.
 6. The composition of claim 1 wherein the ethylene/α-olefin interpolymner has a melt index (I₂) of from about 0.75 g/10 min. to about 1.5 g/10 min.
 7. The composition of claim 1 in the form of a cast film layer, wherein the ethylene/α-olefin interpolymer has a melt index (I₂) of from about 3 g/10 min. to about 17 g/10 min.
 8. The composition of claim 1 in the form of an extruded laminate, wherein the ethylene/α-olefin interpolymer has a melt index (I₂) of from about 3 g/10 min. to about 17 g/10 min.
 9. The composition of claim 1 in the form of a blown film layer, wherein the ethylene/α-olefin interpolymer has a melt index (I₂) of from about 0.5 g/10 min. to about 5 g/10 min.
 10. The composition of claim 1 wherein the ethylene/α-olefin interpolymer is made using a diethyl zinc chain shuttling agent.
 11. The composition of claim 9 wherein the ethylene/α-olefin interpolymer is made by using a concentration of diethyl zinc chain shuttling agent such that the ratio of zinc to ethylene is from about 0.03×10⁻³ to about 1.5×10⁻³.
 12. The composition of claim 1 further comprising polystyrene-saturated polybutadiene-polystyrene.
 13. An elastic film layer comprising the composition of claim 1 wherein the ethylene/α-olefin interpolymer has a density of from about 0.85 to about 0.89 g/cc and a melt index (I₂) of from about 0.5 g/10 min. to about 20 g/10 min. and wherein a compression molded film layer is capable of stress relaxation of at most about 60% at 75% strain at 100° F. for at least 10 hours.
 14. A laminate comprising at least one elastic or inelastic fabric, and an elastic film layer comprising the composition of claim
 13. 15. The laminate of claim 14 wherein the film layer is capable of stress relaxation of at most about 40% at 75% strain at 100° F. for at least 10 hours.
 16. The laminate of claim 14 wherein the fabric is nonwoven fabric selected from the group consisting of melt blown, spunbond, carded staple fibers, spunlaced staple fibers, and air laid staple fibers.
 17. The laminate of claim 14 wherein the fabric comprises at least two compositionally different fibers.
 18. The laminate of claim 14, wherein the fabric comprises a multi-component polymeric fiber, wherein at least one of the polymeric components comprises at least a portion of the fiber's surface.
 19. A fabricated article comprising the composition of claim
 1. 20. A fabricated article comprising the elastic film layer of claim
 13. 21. A fabricated article comprising the laminate of claim
 14. 22. A fabricated article comprising the composition of claim 1 wherein said fabricated articles is selected from the group consisting of adult incontinence articles, feminine hygiene articles, infant care articles, surgical gowns, medical drapes, household cleaning articles, expandable food covers, protective clothing and personal care articles.
 23. A fabricated article comprising the elastic film layer of claim 13 wherein said fabricated articles is selected from the group consisting of adult incontinence articles, feminine hygiene articles, infant care articles, surgical gowns, medical drapes, household cleaning articles, expandable food covers, protective clothing and personal care articles.
 24. A fabricated article comprising the laminate of claim 14 wherein said fabricated articles is selected from the group consisting of adult incontinence articles, feminine hygiene articles, infant care articles, surgical gowns, medical drapes, household cleaning articles, expandable food covers, protective clothing and personal care articles.
 25. The elastic film layer of claim 13 in the form of a multilayer film structure.
 26. The composition of claim 1 wherein the percent recovery is greater than or equal to −1629×density (g/cm³)+1481.
 27. The composition of claim 2 wherein the percent recovery is greater than or equal to −1629×density (g/cm³)+1481.
 28. The composition of claim 3 wherein the percent recovery is greater than or equal to −1629×density (g/cm³)+1481.
 29. A necked bonded material comprising a laminate comprising the composition of claim
 1. 30. The necked bonded material of claim 29 wherein the laminate is apertured.
 31. A stretched bonded material comprising a laminate comprising the composition of claim
 1. 32. The stretched bonded material of claim 31 wherein the laminate is apertured.
 33. A machine direction activated material comprising a laminate comprising the composition of claim
 1. 34. The machine direction activated material of claim 33 wherein the laminate is apertured.
 35. A cross direction activated material comprising a laminate comprising the composition of claim
 1. 36. The cross direction activated material of claim 33 wherein the laminate is apertured.
 37. A machine direction activated and cross direction activated material comprising a laminate comprising the composition of claim
 1. 38. The machine direction activated and cross direction activated material of claim 37 wherein the laminate is apertured. 